Australia Tech News - Page 7 of 109 - Techbest - Top Tech Reviews In Australia

Cyber Contracts Not Meeting Board Expectations: Kaine Mathrick Tech CEO


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Cyber Contracts and Board Expectations in Australia

Cyber Contracts and Board Expectations in Australia

Cyber contracts not satisfying boards' requirements: Kaine Mathrick Tech CEO

Bradley Kaine, Kaine Mathrick Tech

Quick Overview

  • Current cybersecurity agreements fail to align with board expectations.
  • Emphasis on cyber resilience and adherence to Australian standards is essential.
  • New regulations necessitate improved incident reporting and response.
  • Entities must align agreements with overarching strategic objectives.

Status of Cyber Contracts

According to Bradley Kaine, CEO of Kaine Mathrick Tech, Australian cybersecurity agreements are not fulfilling the expectations set by boards. Despite the Commonwealth’s introduction of new cyber risk model clauses, numerous entities continue to neglect integrating cyber resilience across all layers of their procurement and vendor management strategies.

Impact of Regulatory Changes

The enactment of the Cyber Security Act 2024 and the mandate for 72-hour ransomware payment reporting serve as key motivators for organisations to reconsider their incident response clauses. However, approaching these adjustments solely as compliance measures could prove harmful. The 2023–2030 Australian Cyber Security Strategy emphasizes the importance of cultivating trust and resilience within a digital economy, urging organisations to regard cybersecurity as a matter of boardroom importance.

Essential Contractual Elements for Cybersecurity

Incident response and recovery play vital roles in cybersecurity agreements. Kaine recommends that organisations incorporate a “Mandatory Incident Disclosure and Cooperation” clause, compelling vendors to promptly alert clients regarding any ransomware incidents, reveal all interactions with extortionists, and fully cooperate in forensic investigations and governmental reports.

Connecting Cybersecurity with Board Expectations

Boards are facing growing scrutiny from regulators, shareholders, and the public to guarantee cyber resilience. A significant number of cybersecurity contracts remain overly fixated on technical controls rather than strategic integration. To close this gap, Kaine proposes a “Board-Level Cyber Risk Reporting and Assurance” clause that requires regular, board-ready updates on cyber security posture, alignment with frameworks such as the ACSC’s Essential Eight, and provisions for third-party assessments.

Conclusion

Australian organisations must reassess their strategies concerning cybersecurity contracts to align with board expectations. Incorporating resilience, synchronizing with strategic objectives, and adhering to recent regulations are crucial steps to ensure that contracts address not only IT issues but also considerations of risk, governance, and accountability.

Q&A

Q: What are the reasons for the inadequacy of current cybersecurity contracts in meeting board expectations?

A: Numerous contracts remain excessively focused on IT aspects and lack the necessary strategic alignment with the board’s objectives related to governance, risk, and resilience.

Q: What should organisations prioritize when evaluating cybersecurity contracts?

A: Organisations ought to concentrate on embedding resilience, executing risk-based evaluations, and ensuring that contracts encompass incident response, data safeguarding, and compliance with Australian standards.

Q: What consequences does the Cyber Security Act 2024 have for contracts?

A: The Act, in conjunction with the Ransomware Payment Reporting Rules 2025, compels organisations to reevaluate their incident response agreements, focusing on legal and reputational factors in addition to compliance.

Q: How can boards ensure their organisation’s readiness against cyber threats?

A: Boards can insist on provisions that mandate vendors to provide regular updates, align with key frameworks, and incorporate measures for audits and incident simulations.

Cybersecurity Agreements Fall Short of Boardroom Demands, Cautions Kaine Mathrick Tech CEO


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Quick Read

  • Cybersecurity agreements are misaligned with the requirements of boardrooms, claims Kaine Mathrick Tech CEO.
  • The Cyber Security Act 2024 alongside new ransomware disclosure mandates underscores the requirement for revised incident response agreements.
  • Organizations ought to integrate cyber resilience into procurement and vendor governance procedures.
  • Board members are advised to prioritize risk, resilience, and governance over purely technical measures.

The Expanding Discrepancy in Cybersecurity Agreements

Cybersecurity agreements are inadequately meeting the extensive demands of boardrooms, as stated by Bradley Kaine, CEO of Kaine Mathrick Tech. With the evolution of cyber threats, there is a growing need for contracts that focus on extensive risk management and governance, rather than limiting themselves to technical solutions.

Regulatory Drivers: Cyber Security Act 2024

The Cyber Security Act 2024 and the obligation for 72-hour ransomware payment reporting are critical prompts for organizations to reassess their incident response strategies. However, Kaine cautions against considering these regulations as simply compliance tasks. They should encourage a more profound incorporation of cyber resilience into the overall organizational strategy.

Integrating Cyber Resilience

Bradley Kaine highlights the necessity of integrating cyber resilience throughout all levels of procurement and vendor management. This entails conducting risk-focused evaluations of suppliers, ensuring contracts stipulate clear expectations regarding incident response, and thoroughly examining cyber insurance policies.

Strategic Synchronization with Boardroom Requirements

Even with the increasing number of cyber threats, numerous cybersecurity agreements still prioritize IT concerns while failing to align with the strategic requirements of boardrooms. There is an urgent need for contracts to incorporate the lexicon of risk, resilience, and governance. Kaine recommends the implementation of board-level provisions that feature regular updates, adherence to defined frameworks, and clauses for third-party assessments.

Conclusion

As they confront evolving cyber threats and heightened regulatory scrutiny, Australian organizations must adjust their cybersecurity agreements to better fit boardroom requirements. This transition involves moving from solely technical responses to a focus on risk management and strategic alignment. Integrating cyber resilience into procurement strategies and ensuring thorough incident response initiatives are essential measures for this alignment.

Q&A

Q: What is the primary concern with existing cybersecurity agreements?

A: Existing cybersecurity agreements typically do not meet the strategic expectations of boardrooms, leaning heavily on technical details instead of encompassing broader risk management and governance elements.

Q: In what way should organizations adjust to the Cyber Security Act 2024?

A: Organizations should regard the Act as a prompt to review and improve their incident response protocols, ensuring the incorporation of cyber resilience in their procurement and vendor management activities.

Q: What is an essential clause in contracts pertaining to incident response?

A: A “Compulsory Incident Notification and Collaboration” clause is vital, mandating that vendors immediately inform clients about ransomware occurrences and fully cooperate in investigations and subsequent reporting.

Q: How can boards guarantee that cybersecurity agreements fulfill their requirements?

A: Boards should require clauses that mandate regular updates on cybersecurity status at the board level, alignment with accepted frameworks, as well as provisions for third-party evaluations and incident drills.

Cyber contracts not meeting boards' needs: Kaine Mathrick Tech CEO

Bradley Kaine, Kaine Mathrick Tech

175 Games Now Leverage NVIDIA DLSS 4 Capability


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Fast Overview

  • NVIDIA’s DLSS 4 technology enhances gaming performance considerably.
  • More than 175 games now utilize DLSS 4, improving visuals and frame rates.
  • Path tracing and ray tracing are becoming standard practices in contemporary gaming.
  • NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Series graphics cards uniquely support DLSS 4.
  • A new GeForce RTX 50 Series package features Borderlands 4.

NVIDIA DLSS 4 Transforms Gaming Performance

NVIDIA’s DLSS 4, the newest AI-enhanced rendering technology, is revolutionizing the gaming experience by offering remarkable performance enhancements. Utilizing AI to generate additional high-quality frames, players can enjoy more fluid gameplay and elevated frame rates, even at maximum settings. This state-of-the-art feature is solely available on NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 50 Series graphics cards.

NVIDIA's DLSS 4 empowers 175 games with enhanced performance

Growing Game Compatibility

With over 175 games and applications integrating DLSS 4, the technology has gained extensive traction among developers. Anticipated upcoming releases like Borderlands 4, Resident Evil Requiem, The Outer Worlds 2, Phantom Blade Zero, and PRAGMATA are poised to take advantage of DLSS 4’s features.

Path Tracing and Ray Tracing: Emerging Norms

Path Tracing for Supreme Realism

Certain titles are aiming for unparalleled graphical accuracy by utilizing path tracing. This sophisticated method tracks the path of each light ray, producing lighting effects that are nearly indistinguishable from actual life. With DLSS 4, games such as Directive 8020 and Resident Evil Requiem make this technology feasible.

Ray Tracing Becomes a Standard

Ray tracing is being extensively implemented to enhance visual immersion, offering realistic lighting, precise shadows, and dynamic reflections. Titles like Black State, CINDER CITY, The Outer Worlds 2, and PRAGMATA are at the forefront.

Improving Gameplay with DLSS 4

DLSS 4 for Optimal Performance

DLSS 4’s Multi Frame Generation aims to maximize performance by creating new frames between traditionally rendered ones, significantly increasing frame rates. Games such as Borderlands 4 and Fate Trigger are expected to provide fluid gameplay.

RTX Hair for Realistic Characters

NVIDIA’s technology is also enhancing character authenticity. Games like Indiana Jones and the Great Circle will incorporate RTX Hair, utilizing the RTX 50 Series GPUs to produce intricate, realistic hair animations.

Cloud Gaming and Software Developments

NVIDIA App Enhancements

The NVIDIA app, crucial for GeForce RTX users, now features global DLSS overrides and software updates, streamlining the process of keeping systems optimized with the latest drivers.

NVIDIA ACE and RTX Remix

NVIDIA ACE enhances voice-based interactions in games, while RTX Remix evolves through community feedback, introducing new features such as a particle system for classic titles.

Exclusive Gaming Packages

Borderlands 4 GeForce RTX 50 Series Package

NVIDIA’s latest GeForce RTX 50 Series package includes Borderlands 4 along with additional DLC. This offer is accessible in Australia via participating retailers until September 22, 2025. Prices for the RTX 5070 start at around A$928.

Conclusion

NVIDIA’s DLSS 4 is reshaping PC gaming by improving performance and visual fidelity through AI-driven rendering. With broad developer backing and the integration of technologies like path tracing and ray tracing, the RTX 50 Series is set to deliver extraordinary gaming experiences.

FAQs

Q: What is DLSS 4?

A: DLSS 4 is NVIDIA’s new AI-based rendering technology that enhances gaming performance by producing extra high-quality frames.

Q: Which graphics cards are compatible with DLSS 4?

A: DLSS 4 is available solely on NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 50 Series graphics cards.

Q: What does path tracing mean?

A: Path tracing is a rendering method that follows the complete path of light rays to generate extremely realistic lighting effects in video games.

Q: In what ways does ray tracing improve gaming visuals?

A: Ray tracing enhances visual authenticity by simulating the interaction of light with objects, providing realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections.

Q: What is included in the GeForce RTX 50 Series bundle?

A: The bundle features a GeForce RTX 50 Series graphics card and a copy of Borderlands 4, along with additional downloadable content.

“Delegating Your Risk? Brennan’s Cyber Leader Cautions Against Complacency”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Cybersecurity Contracts: Managing Risks and Responsibilities

Cybersecurity Contracts: Managing Risks and Responsibilities

Quick Overview

  • Outsourcing risk is a fallacy; shared responsibility is essential.
  • Clarity in contracts is vital; steer clear of vagueness and uncertainty.
  • Compliance must not eclipse sound cybersecurity practices.
  • Emphasize practical risk evaluations for third and fourth-party risks.
  • SaaS contracts ought to extend beyond basic agreements for critical data safeguarding.
  • Incident response clauses are crucial, particularly for ransomware notifications.
  • Cyber insurance is altering contract demands; comprehend its provisions.
  • Small enterprises should prioritize essential contracts for effective investment.

Fallacy of Outsourcing Risk

Peter Soulsby cautions against the outsourcing of risk in cybersecurity contracts

Brennan’s cybersecurity head, Peter Soulsby, warns organisations against the notion that they can delegate their risk. According to Soulsby, cybersecurity is a collective obligation that demands precise and clear contracts.

Significance of Clear and Specific Contracts

Australian organisations are encouraged to revise their cybersecurity contracts with detailed stipulations. Ambiguous contracts frequently result in misinterpretations and failures.

Compliance Versus Effective Cybersecurity

Soulsby points out the conflict between compliance and practical cybersecurity. He cautions that compliance should not undermine the application of strong cybersecurity measures.

Assessing Third-Party and Fourth-Party Risks

With rising regulatory scrutiny, assessments of third-party and even fourth-party risks are becoming more prominent. Soulsby promotes more practical evaluations over cumbersome surveys.

Challenges in Protecting SaaS Data

Depending on contracts with leading SaaS providers can be deceptive. Soulsby recommends utilizing dynamic tools for assessing third-party risks related to critical data.

Clauses for Incident Response and Recovery

In light of ransomware threats, Soulsby proposes that contracts must guarantee providers offer best practices and hold clients responsible.

Effects of Cyber Insurance on Contracts

Cyber insurance is transforming contract dynamics. Organisations should grasp their coverage and avoid unnecessary expenditure on incident response.

Striking a Balance Between Accountability and Liability

Soulsby stresses that businesses cannot relinquish responsibility through outsourcing. Successful partnerships rely on shared accountability.

Guidance for Small Enterprises

Small businesses ought to concentrate on critical contracts and ensure mutually advantageous terms to enhance their cybersecurity investments.

Conclusion

Brennan’s Peter Soulsby encourages Australian organisations to reassess their strategies regarding cybersecurity contracts. Specificity, shared responsibilities, and a balance between compliance and security are essential for effective contract management.

Q&A: Frequently Asked Questions on Cybersecurity Contracts

Q: What makes outsourcing cybersecurity risk hazardous?

A:

Outsourcing risk can create a misleading sense of safety. It’s crucial to uphold shared accountability and ensure contracts define roles and responsibilities clearly.

Q: How can organisations guarantee their contracts are sufficiently specific?

A:

Organisations should explicitly outline their cybersecurity requirements in contracts and seek external assistance if needed to ensure clarity and eliminate ambiguities.

Q: What should organisations prioritize in third-party risk assessments?

A:

Emphasize practical evaluations rather than extensive questionnaires. Effective risk assessments should take into account the wider supply chain.

Q: In what way does cyber insurance influence cybersecurity contracts?

A:

Cyber insurance frequently intersects with contract requirements. Organisations must grasp their coverage to prevent redundant expenses and conflicts.

Q: What recommendations are available for small businesses facing financial limits?

A:

Small businesses should concentrate on essential contracts and ensure terms are mutually beneficial to maximise their cybersecurity investment.

Monash University Selects Technology Collaborators for Advanced Supercomputer


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Monash University Collaborates with Tech Giants for Supercomputer

Monash University Collaborates with Tech Giants for Supercomputer

Quick Overview:

  • Monash University partners with Nvidia, Dell, and CDC Data Centres.
  • MAVERIC supercomputer to enhance AI research.
  • Main focus areas: health and climate research.
  • Construction of the supercomputer set to commence in 2023, with a launch anticipated in 2026.
  • Facility located at CDC Data Centres, situated west of Melbourne’s CBD.
  • Total investment for the project is $60 million.
Monash Uni chooses technology suppliers for supercomputer

Nvidia GB200 NVL72
NVIDIA

Overview of MAVERIC

MAVERIC, which stands for Monash AdVanced Environment for Research and Intelligent Computing, is Monash University’s latest effort to advance its research capabilities through innovative technology. The collaboration with Nvidia, Dell, and CDC Data Centres aims to establish a cutting-edge AI supercomputer.

Technological Infrastructure

The MAVERIC supercomputer will utilize Nvidia’s GB200 NVL72 architecture, equipped with 36 Arm Neoverse V2 based Grace central processors and 72 Blackwell graphics cards. These elements will be linked together using Nvidia’s NVLink technology, providing up to 130 terabytes of bandwidth with minimal latency.

Dell’s Contribution to Integration

Dell is set to play a vital role by incorporating the Nvidia GB200 NVL72 into its integrated rack scalable systems, like the IR7000 with a PowerEdge XE9712 server. This partnership guarantees that the hardware is fine-tuned for research applications.

Location and Funding

The MAVERIC supercomputer will be located at CDC Data Centres in Brooklyn, about 10km west of Melbourne’s central business district. This initiative entails a significant financial commitment of $60 million, underscoring the university’s dedication to enhancing research capabilities.

Research Priority Areas

MAVERIC is expected to play a key role in pioneering research in health, including early detection of cancer, management of chronic diseases, and the development of new medications. Furthermore, the supercomputer will aid in climate research by examining complex data sets connected to air quality, Antarctic studies, and the implications of climate change on infectious diseases.

Future Aspirations

Professor Sharon Pickering, vice-chancellor of Monash University, highlighted the strategic role of AI in influencing the future. The university is focused on utilizing AI to address tangible challenges, ranging from medical advancements to sustainable environmental practices.

Timeline for the Project

The MAVERIC supercomputer construction is planned to commence this year, with full operational capability expected by the beginning of 2026. This schedule ensures the university remains a leader in research innovation.

Conclusion

Monash University’s collaboration with Nvidia, Dell, and CDC Data Centres signifies a major advancement in the field of AI research. The MAVERIC supercomputer is set to propel progress in health and climate investigations, solidifying the university’s position as a frontrunner in technological and scientific growth.

Q: What does MAVERIC represent?

A: MAVERIC stands for Monash AdVanced Environment for Research and Intelligent Computing, and it is a supercomputing initiative by Monash University.

Q: Who are the collaborators on this initiative?

A: The collaborators include Nvidia, Dell, and CDC Data Centres.

Q: What primary research subjects will MAVERIC concentrate on?

A: The supercomputer will concentrate on health-related research and climate studies.

Q: Where is MAVERIC situated?

A: It will be situated at CDC Data Centres, to the west of Melbourne’s CBD.

Q: When is MAVERIC expected to start functioning?

A: The supercomputer is projected to be operational by early 2026.

Q: What is the investment amount for the MAVERIC project?

A: The project entails an investment of $60 million.

Q: What technology platform will MAVERIC utilize?

A: MAVERIC will utilize Nvidia’s GB200 NVL72 platform.

Q: How is this initiative significant for Monash University?

A: It positions the university at the leading edge of AI research, addressing crucial health and environmental issues.

Google faces $55m fine due to search agreements with Telstra and Optus


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Google’s Legal Issues in Australia

Google faces $55m penalty over Telstra, Optus deals

Quick Overview

  • Google is confronting a $55 million sanction in Federal Court regarding arrangements with Telstra and Optus.
  • The arrangements reportedly hindered competition by pre-installing Google Search on Android devices.
  • Telstra and Optus were engaged from December 2019 to March 2021, receiving shares of advertising revenues.
  • Google concedes its activities may have diminished competition and agrees to revised conditions.
  • The Federal Court will assess the penalty and Google’s pledges towards equitable competition.

ACCC’s Claims Against Google

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has initiated legal proceedings against Google, accusing it of engaging in anti-competitive behavior concerning agreements with major Australian telecommunications companies, Telstra and Optus. The arrangements guaranteed Google Search as the primary search engine on Android gadgets sold by these companies, limiting the installation of other search engines.

Consequences of the Agreements

Between December 2019 and March 2021, Telstra and Optus were part of these agreements, receiving a share of the advertising income produced by Google Search on these devices. Nevertheless, the arrangements were not renewed last year, and the telecommunications companies do not participate in the ongoing judicial proceedings.

Google’s Acknowledgment and Legal Proceedings

Google has recognized that its behavior might have significantly impacted competition in the marketplace. To resolve the situation, Google has consented to a $55 million penalty, pending court ratification. Additionally, Google has pledged to new strategies that enable any general search engine to be pre-installed and promoted on Android devices by hardware manufacturers and telecommunications companies in Australia.

Future Adherence and Market Effect

Under the revised arrangement, Google will guarantee that Android device producers and Australian mobile service providers can select alternative general search engine options and can license applications like Google Play independently of Google’s search engine and Chrome browser. The Federal Court will determine if the penalty and Google’s suggested commitments are suitable.

Conclusion

In light of accusations of anti-competitive practices, Google has accepted a $55 million penalty and new measures to foster fair competition in Australia’s search engine landscape. This case accentuates the growing scrutiny of technology giants and their impact on consumer selection and market conditions.

Q: What prompted the ACCC’s legal action against Google?

A: The ACCC alleged that Google’s agreements with Telstra and Optus restricted competition by setting Google Search as the default on Android devices, inhibiting the installation of other search engines.

Q: What was the timeframe of Google’s agreements with Telstra and Optus?

A: The agreements were effective from December 2019 until March 2021 but were not extended after they concluded.

Q: What advantages did the agreements provide to Telstra and Optus?

A: Telstra and Optus received a portion of the revenue generated from advertisements displayed on Google Search when accessed via Android devices sold by these companies.

Q: What commitments has Google undertaken to address the ACCC’s issues?

A: Google has pledged to permit any general search engine to be preloaded on Android devices and to ensure that manufacturers and telecommunications companies can license applications like Google Play independently from Google’s search engine and Chrome browser.

Q: Will Telstra and Optus incur any penalties?

A: No, Telstra and Optus are not involved in the court proceedings and will not receive any penalties.

Q: What is the importance of the court’s ruling?

A: The court’s ruling will ascertain whether Google’s proposed penalty and commitments adequately address the anti-competitive concerns raised by the ACCC.

State of MarTech: The Advancement of Digital Experience


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

The Transformation of Digital Experiences in Australian Financial Services

The Transformation of Digital Experiences in Australian Financial Services

Quick Overview

  • Customisation is now an essential objective in financial services marketing.
  • NOW Finance aims for smooth customer journeys by integrating its martech resources.
  • Brighter Super seeks lifelong member involvement through tailored digital interactions.
  • Both companies leverage technology and storytelling to strengthen customer connections.

Customisation in Financial Services

Rising competition in the financial services industry, coupled with escalating customer expectations for bespoke experiences, has established customisation as a fundamental element of contemporary marketing tactics. For Australian entities like NOW Finance, this necessitates investing in powerful marketing automation and campaign execution capabilities.

Chris Maccan, who became part of NOW Finance five years prior, recognised the necessity to unify their disjointed martech tools. Initially utilising Braze and HubSpot independently, they opted to centralise workflows within HubSpot to create a seamless customer journey.

Digital Transformation in Financial Services

“It has facilitated a change in our strategy, transitioning from backend to frontend systems for enhanced process alignment and customer tracking,” Maccan stated. This transition supports NOW Finance’s multi-channel distribution model and direct-to-consumer personal finance solutions.

Enduring Engagement with Brighter Super

Brighter Super, born from the merger of industry and retail superannuation funds, aims to mirror the warmth of offline connections in its digital platforms. Brad Hancock, head of customer experience, stresses the significance of individualisation over broad personalisation.

Personalised Digital Experiences

“Our aim is to craft a comprehensive seamless journey where the member holds the reins,” Hancock notes. Brighter Super concentrates on sentiment interpretation and storytelling to ensure that Queensland members receive timely guidance and optimise their chances.

Hancock also underscores the difficulty of gathering insights to guide recommendations, emphasising the necessity of omnichannel experiences and individualisation.

Conclusion

The progression of digital experience in Australian financial services showcases the sector’s dedication to customisation and enduring customer engagement. By harnessing technology and storytelling, organisations like NOW Finance and Brighter Super are establishing new benchmarks for customer relationships.

Q&A

Q: Why is customisation vital in financial services marketing?

A: Customisation enables financial services to fulfil customer demands for personalised experiences, enhancing satisfaction and loyalty.

Q: How did NOW Finance enhance its customer journey?

A: By merging their martech tools into HubSpot, NOW Finance optimised its processes and improved customer journey tracking.

Q: What is Brighter Super’s method regarding customisation?

A: Brighter Super prioritises individualisation, crafting a seamless digital experience that mirrors offline warmth and empowers the member.

Q: How do storytelling and sentiment interpretation enhance customer engagement?

A: Storytelling enables brands to connect on an emotional level with customers, while sentiment interpretation guarantees that communications are timely and relevant, boosting engagement.

Q: What role does technology play in these digital evolutions?

A: Technology facilitates the development of efficient sales pathways and personalised experiences by enhancing process coordination and yielding data-driven insights.

Accenture Poised to Purchase Prominent Australian Cybersecurity Company CyberCX


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Accenture’s Tactical Acquisition: CyberCX

Brief Overview

  • Accenture has revealed the acquisition of CyberCX, estimated at over A$1 billion.
  • Established in 2019, CyberCX now has around 1,400 employees.
  • Australia is encountering mounting cyber threats, with significant breaches at Optus and Medibank.
  • Since 2015, Accenture has finalised 20 acquisitions focused on security.

Accenture’s Tactical Acquisition

Accenture secures acquisition of Australian cybersecurity leader CyberCX

Accenture is set to acquire the Australian cybersecurity leader CyberCX, representing its most substantial investment in this field thus far. The deal, evaluated at more than A$1 billion by the Australian Financial Review, underscores the pressing necessity of cybersecurity in light of rising global cyber threats.

CyberCX: An Emerging Force in Cybersecurity

Founded in 2019, CyberCX arose from the amalgamation of 12 smaller cybersecurity companies, facilitated by BGH Capital. Now a significant player in the field, CyberCX operates security operations centers across Australia and New Zealand, with additional offices in London and New York.

Guided by John Paitaridis, ex-managing director of Optus Business, and Alastair MacGibbon, the former national cybersecurity coordinator of Australia, CyberCX is strategically positioned to take advantage of the rising demand for digital security.

The Importance of Cybersecurity Today

With a spike in cyber attacks, including significant breaches at Optus and Medibank, the urgency for effective cybersecurity solutions has escalated tremendously. These events have laid bare the personal information of millions, revealing weaknesses in Australia’s digital infrastructure.

Accenture’s acquisition of CyberCX serves as a tactical effort to enhance its cybersecurity offerings, following 20 other security-centered acquisitions since 2015.

Conclusion

The acquisition of CyberCX by Accenture signifies a major advancement in improving digital security capabilities in Australia and worldwide. As cyber threats continue to grow in frequency, this strategic move aligns with the increasing demand for enhanced security solutions.

Q&A

Q: What does Accenture’s acquisition of CyberCX signify?

A: This acquisition represents Accenture’s largest initiative in the cybersecurity field, demonstrating a strong commitment to improve digital security services in response to escalating global cyber threats.

Q: What led to the formation of CyberCX?

A: CyberCX was created in 2019 through the merger of 12 smaller cybersecurity entities, supported by BGH Capital, and has since developed into a leading industry player.

Q: What recent cyber threats have affected Australia?

A: Australia has witnessed several major cyber attacks, including breaches at Optus and Medibank, impacting millions of users and emphasizing the necessity for enhanced cybersecurity solutions.

Q: How has Accenture broadened its cybersecurity capabilities?

A: Since 2015, Accenture has undertaken 20 security acquisitions, including recent purchases of firms such as Morphus, MNEMO Mexico, and Innotec Security.

Q: What role does the leadership at CyberCX play in its success?

A: CyberCX is steered by seasoned industry professionals John Paitaridis and Alastair MacGibbon, whose leadership and expertise have been crucial in establishing the company as a leader in cybersecurity.

Yackandandah Commemorates the Introduction of Its Second Community Battery, Yack 02


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Quick Read

  • Yackandandah unveils its second community battery, Yack 02, strengthening local energy resilience.
  • The initiative aligns with Victoria’s ambition for a decentralized energy grid.
  • Yack 02, situated at Yackandandah Sports Park, boasts a 60kW/200kWh battery system.
  • The battery operates in conjunction with a 63kW rooftop solar array for eco-friendly energy storage.
  • Community-led project supported by Totally Renewable Yackandandah and Indigo Power.
  • The effort is endorsed by the Victorian Government’s 100 Neighbourhood Batteries Program.

A Step Toward a Decentralized Energy Future

The Yack 02 battery plays a crucial role in Victoria’s movement toward a decentralized energy grid. Backed by the Victorian Government’s 100 Neighbourhood Batteries Program, this effort seeks to modernize the state’s energy framework by deploying community-level energy storage solutions. These batteries capture surplus solar energy produced from local rooftop installations, alleviating grid congestion, decreasing energy expenses, and empowering communities to utilize clean, renewable energy.

By harnessing excess solar energy throughout the day, Yack 02 guarantees power availability during high-demand evening hours and, importantly, during grid failures. This functionality benefits Yackandandah residents while also aiding in stabilizing the broader energy network, minimizing the necessity for costly grid enhancements.

Yackandandah launches second community battery, Yack 02

Yack 02: Technical Specifications and Features

Located strategically at the Yackandandah Sports Park, an essential community center, Yack 02 is intended to deliver dependable power during emergencies. Its primary specifications include:

  • Location: Yackandandah Sports Park
  • Battery System: Pixii 60kW/200kWh Battery Energy Storage System, using Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) technology for increased safety and durability
  • Solar Integration: Combined with a 63kW rooftop solar array mounted on the sports park facilities, ensuring the battery is charged with locally sourced renewable energy
  • Blackout Protection: Equipped with “islanding” functionality, enabling the battery to detach from the grid during outages and supply power to the sports park, preserving essential community functions

Building on Yack 01’s Success

Yackandandah’s path initiated with Yack 01, its inaugural community battery, which commenced operation in July 2021 at the historic sawmill site, now occupied by the Agency of Sculpture. Yack 01 offers a capacity of 100kW/274kWh and is linked to a 65kW solar array featuring bi-facial panels to optimize energy capture. This groundbreaking project validated the feasibility of behind-the-meter community battery solutions in Australia, paving the way for Yack 02.

The achievements of Yack 01 delivered crucial insights and assurance for the community to broaden its energy storage capabilities. Collectively, the two batteries form a robust, localized energy ecosystem that maximizes the utilization of Yackandandah’s plentiful rooftop solar, with over 60% of residences in the town now fitted with solar panels.

A Community-Driven Renewable Revolution

The primary catalyst behind Yackandandah’s renewable energy success is Totally Renewable Yackandandah, a volunteer-driven organization committed to securing 100% renewable energy for the town. The launch of Yack 02 illustrates the community’s dedication and collaborative ethos.

“This is an incredible milestone for the Yackandandah community. The Yack 02 battery will be crucial in our journey toward 100% renewable energy, and it exemplifies what can be accomplished when we unite,” stated Matthew Charles-Jones, president of Totally Renewable Yackandandah.

The partnership between Totally Renewable Yackandandah, Indigo Power, local councils, and installers such as KDEC Solar and Electrical underscores the value of community-led efforts bolstered by strategic government support.

A Blueprint for Australia’s Energy Future

With Yack 01 and Yack 02 now functioning, Yackandandah is not only decreasing its carbon footprint but also establishing a resilient, self-sustaining energy system. The town’s innovative model serves as an example for other communities in Australia seeking to transition to renewable energy while ensuring energy security during outages.

As Yackandandah continues to set a precedent, its community batteries showcase the transformative potential of localized energy solutions. For additional information on this inspiring initiative, visit https://totallyrenewableyack.org.au/.

Summary

The introduction of the Yack 02 battery by Yackandandah signifies a major milestone in the town’s renewable energy journey. This new addition boosts local energy resilience, supports Victoria’s decentralized energy grid goals, and highlights the strength of community-driven renewable initiatives. The collaboration among Totally Renewable Yackandandah, Indigo Power, and the Victorian Government establishes a benchmark for other Australian communities striving for sustainable energy solutions.

Q: What is the Yack 02 battery?

A: Yack 02 is the second community battery in Yackandandah, Victoria, designed for storing excess solar energy and providing power during blackouts.

Q: Where is Yack 02 located?

A: It is found at the Yackandandah Sports Park.

Q: What are the technical specifications of Yack 02?

A: Yack 02 features a Pixii 60kW/200kWh Battery Energy Storage System and integrates with a 63kW rooftop solar array.

Q: How does Yack 02 contribute to energy resilience?

A: It captures surplus solar energy, ensures power availability during peak periods and outages, and alleviates grid congestion.

Q: Who are the key partners in the Yack 02 project?

A: The project is a joint effort between Totally Renewable Yackandandah, Indigo Power, local councils, KDEC Solar and Electrical, and the Victorian Government.

Q: How does Yack 02 fit into Victoria’s energy strategy?

A: It corresponds with the Victorian Government’s 100 Neighbourhood Batteries Program, aimed at modernizing the state’s energy infrastructure.

Microsoft Researchers Uncover “BitUnlocker” Full-Volume Encryption Workaround


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Quick Overview

  • Researchers at Microsoft identified security flaws in the Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE) that may allow for circumvention of BitLocker encryption.
  • The security issues were referred to as “BitUnlocker” by the STORM team at Microsoft.
  • Four methods of attack exploited the trust established between BitLocker and WinRE.
  • The vulnerabilities enabled attackers to boot unverified recovery environments, gaining unrestricted access to encrypted volumes.
  • Microsoft resolved these issues in July 2025, suggesting enhanced security measures such as using TPM with a PIN.

BitUnlocker: A Newly Emerged Security Concern

The Security Testing and Offensive Research at Microsoft (STORM) team has revealed vulnerabilities in the Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE) that permit attackers to circumvent BitLocker encryption. This finding, dubbed “BitUnlocker,” showed four methods of attack that took advantage of the trust between BitLocker and WinRE, enabling physical access device attackers to override encryption safeguards.

The Central Problem: WinRE’s Auto-Unlock Feature

The vulnerabilities arise from WinRE’s “auto-unlock” feature, which provides full access to encrypted volumes during recovery processes. Although these recovery processes are essential for system restoration, they unintentionally introduced new attack vectors.

Identified Attack Methods

The STORM team discovered four separate attack methods, each with a distinct CVE identifier. The first vulnerability, CVE-2025-48804, exploited the way WinRE handles System Deployment Image (SDI) files. Attackers could append malicious Windows images to legitimate Boot.sdi files to circumvent integrity checks.

Two vulnerabilities related to ReAgent.xml parsing, CVE-2025-48800 and CVE-2025-48003, offered alternative means of attack. These vulnerabilities involved the misuse of legitimate tools and hotkey combinations to access encrypted volumes.

Full Volume Decryption Capability

The most critical vulnerability, CVE-2025-48818, facilitated the total decryption of BitLocker-protected volumes through the manipulation of Boot Configuration Data (BCD) stores. This exploit utilized a combination of multiple techniques to achieve devastating effects.

Countermeasures and Patching

To mitigate these vulnerabilities, Microsoft suggests activating the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) with a personal identification number (PIN) for pre-boot authentication. This approach emphasizes hardware security, thereby minimizing software attack surfaces. Furthermore, the REVISE mitigation strategy is in place to thwart BitLocker downgrade attacks.

All detected vulnerabilities were addressed in Microsoft’s July 2025 security updates. This discovery was also showcased at significant security events, such as Black Hat USA 2025 and DEF CON 33.

Conclusion

The identification of the “BitUnlocker” vulnerabilities in WinRE by Microsoft underscores the necessity of securing recovery environments. By rectifying these weaknesses and suggesting improved security protocols, Microsoft seeks to shield users from possible encryption circumvention. Maintaining hardware-level security and ensuring systems are current remains vital for the protection of data integrity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What does “BitUnlocker” refer to?

A:

“BitUnlocker” refers to a set of vulnerabilities in the Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE) that might enable the circumvention of BitLocker encryption, as labeled by Microsoft’s STORM team.

Q: In what way do these vulnerabilities impact BitLocker encryption?

A:

The vulnerabilities exploit the trust dynamics between BitLocker and WinRE, enabling attackers with physical access to devices to bypass encryption and penetrate encrypted volumes.

Q: What measures were taken to address these vulnerabilities?

A:

Microsoft corrected these vulnerabilities through security updates in July 2025. They also recommend activating TPM with PIN and utilizing the REVISE mitigation to bolster security.

Q: What security measures are advised?

A:

It is advised to implement a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) with a personal identification number (PIN) for pre-boot verification, alongside applying the REVISE mitigation strategy to prevent BitLocker downgrade attempts.

Q: Were the vulnerabilities made public?

A:

Indeed, the vulnerabilities and their potential impact were discussed at both the Black Hat USA 2025 and DEF CON 33 security conferences.