Australia Tech News - Page 8 of 50 - Techbest - Top Tech Reviews In Australia

“Crypto Theft Losses Surge to AU$3.4 Billion in 2024”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Crypto Hack Losses Increase Dramatically in 2024: Essential Insights

Crypto Hack Losses Increase Dramatically in 2024: Essential Information for Australians

Quick Overview

  • In 2024, AU$3.5 billion in losses were attributed to crypto hacks, reflecting a 21% rise from 2023.
  • A total of 303 hacking incidents were documented, continuing a concerning pattern.
  • DeFi platforms are still the main targets, making up the bulk of the losses.
  • North Korean hacking factions are involved in a large share of these attacks.
  • Enhanced security measures and regulatory frameworks are vital to address this escalating problem.

What Is Causing the Surge in Crypto Hacks?

A Chainalysis report reveals that cryptocurrency hacks reached AU$3.5 billion in 2024, indicating a 21% jump from the prior year. This significant rise in losses exposes persistent vulnerabilities within digital asset platforms, particularly in the decentralised finance (DeFi) arena.

Due to their open-source structures and intricate coding, DeFi platforms have become appealing targets for hackers. In 2024, these platforms represented the majority of the stolen funds, raising urgent concerns about their long-term security and resilience.

North Korea’s Involvement in Crypto Cybercrime

The report highlights the considerable role North Korean hacking groups play in cryptocurrency theft. These groups are associated with state-sponsored cybercrime activities, utilizing stolen cryptocurrency to finance unlawful operations, including nuclear arms programs. Their advanced methods and ability to take advantage of weaknesses in crypto platforms contribute to their disturbing success rates.

Effects on Australia’s Cryptocurrency Sector

There has been a notable increase in the adoption of cryptocurrencies in Australia, both as investment options and means of transaction. Yet, the uptick in hacking incidents presents a significant threat to investor trust. As local exchanges and platforms expand, they become more appealing targets for cybercriminals.

The Australian government is taking steps to regulate the crypto sector, although the speed of implementation frequently falls behind the swiftly changing threats. It is crucial to bolster cybersecurity practices and create solid frameworks for risk management to protect the nation’s digital economy.

How to Safeguard Against Crypto Hacks

While no system can guarantee complete safety, individuals and businesses can adopt various measures to reduce the likelihood of being affected by crypto hacks:

  • Utilize Cold Wallets: Keep your cryptocurrencies offline in a hardware wallet to reduce susceptibility to online threats.
  • Activate Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Enhance your accounts with an extra layer of security.
  • Conduct Platform Research: Only engage with well-reviewed and secure exchanges or DeFi platforms.
  • Stay Updated: Remain informed about the latest in crypto security and evolving threats.

Conclusion

The remarkable AU$3.5 billion in crypto hack losses in 2024 is a significant alert for investors and the industry worldwide. With DeFi platforms and state-backed hacking groups fueling the rise in incidents, the urgency for enhanced security measures and regulatory scrutiny is more pressing than ever. As Australia continues to adopt cryptocurrencies, the protection of digital assets must be a priority for all involved parties.

Q: Why do hackers frequently target DeFi platforms?

A:

DeFi platforms utilize open-source code, making them transparent but also revealing potential vulnerabilities. Furthermore, their decentralised characteristics often imply a lack of regulatory oversight found in traditional financial organisations, appealing to cybercriminals.

Q: What involvement do North Korean hacking groups have in cryptocurrency theft?

A:

North Korean hacking groups are known to be involved in a substantial number of cryptocurrency thefts. They employ advanced techniques to exploit platform weaknesses and finance unlawful activities, including developing nuclear arms.

Q: What strategies can Australian investors adopt to shield themselves from crypto hacks?

A:

Australian investors should focus on security by using cold wallets, activating two-factor authentication, and rigorously investigating platforms prior to use. Keeping abreast of the latest cybersecurity trends is also essential.

Q: Is the Australian government effectively regulating the crypto sector?

A:

While the Australian government has begun implementing regulations for the crypto sector, challenges persist due to the rapid pace of technological progress. More comprehensive regulatory frameworks are necessary to address emerging threats and safeguard investors.

Q: What are the indicators of a potential crypto hack?

A:

Indicators include irregular account activity, unauthorized transactions, or phishing attempts masquerading as official messages. It is important to monitor your accounts closely and respond promptly if any suspicious activity is detected.

Crypto hack losses reached AU$3.4 billion in 2024

“JAL Reestablishes Normal Operations After Cyber Assault”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Japan Airlines Recovers Operations After Cyber Incident – TechBest

Japan Airlines Restores Operations After Cyber Incident

Quick Overview

  • Japan Airlines (JAL) underwent a cyber incident that affected both their internal and external systems on Thursday morning.
  • Ticket sales for the same day and certain flights were momentarily impacted but have now resumed.
  • There was no breach of customer data, and the airline assured that no harm was done by computer viruses.
  • The problem originated from a faulty router, which has been resolved.
  • ANA Holdings, a rival of JAL, reported no indications of an attack on its systems.
  • American Airlines experienced a different technical issue this week, leading to a temporary grounding of flights on Christmas Eve.

Event Details: A Chronology of Incidents

Japan Airlines (JAL) reported a cyber incident on Thursday morning at 7:24 a.m., causing disruptions to both internal and external systems. This incident resulted in notable interruptions, such as the halt of same-day ticket sales and delays in several domestic and international flights. The underlying cause was traced back to a malfunctioning router, which the airline’s IT team addressed swiftly.

Despite the interruptions, JAL confirmed that customer information remained secure, and the incident was not connected to any computer viruses. By the end of the day, services were normalized, and ticket sales resumed.

Japan Airlines restores operations after cyber incident

Competitive Landscape and Industry Perspective

While JAL experienced disruptions, its competitor ANA Holdings reported no problems with its systems. This emphasizes the differing levels of risk among airlines within the same sector. The incident also occurs amidst rising concerns regarding cybersecurity within the aviation industry, where interconnected systems are more frequently targeted by malicious entities.

Separately, American Airlines encountered a technical issue with network hardware earlier this week. This glitch led to an hour-long grounding of all flights on Christmas Eve, affecting numerous passengers. Such occurrences highlight the essential nature of strong IT frameworks for the seamless operation of airlines.

Cybersecurity in Aviation

The aviation industry has emerged as an attractive target for cybercriminals due to its dependence on complex, interconnected IT systems. Disruptions can have far-reaching impacts, affecting everything from flight operations to passenger information. Airlines are making significant investments in cybersecurity protocols to reduce risks, yet the increasing sophistication of cyber attacks necessitates that these defenses are continuously improved.

Experts advocate for regular system evaluations, comprehensive incident response planning, and staff training to help recognize and address potential threats. As airlines shift to digital advancements to elevate customer experiences, securing these systems becomes more crucial than ever.

Conclusion

Japan Airlines has effectively reinstated its systems following a cyber incident that disrupted its flights and ticket sales. The occurrence underscores the susceptibility of airlines to both technical and cyber challenges, highlighting the significance of robust IT systems. While JAL successfully avoided data breaches and virus impacts, the situation serves as a crucial reminder for the aviation industry to strengthen its cybersecurity strategies.

Q&A: Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Incident

Q: What led to the disruption of JAL’s systems?

A:

The disruption was caused by a malfunctioning router, which impacted both internal and external systems. The IT team resolved the issue the same day.

Q: Was any customer information compromised during the incident?

A:

No, JAL confirmed that no customer data was leaked as a result of the incident.

Q: What effects did the incident have on flights and ticket sales?

A:

Same-day ticket sales were temporarily halted, and several domestic and international flights faced delays. Services resumed once the issue was resolved.

Q: Is this a frequent issue in the aviation sector?

A:

While not a regular occurrence, cyber incidents and technical glitches can happen in the aviation sector due to its reliance on sophisticated IT systems. Such events underscore the necessity for continual investment in cybersecurity.

Q: How does this situation compare to the American Airlines technical issue?

A:

In contrast to JAL’s cyber incident, American Airlines faced a technical issue related to network hardware. Nonetheless, both events caused considerable disruptions, highlighting the vulnerability of airline IT infrastructures.

Q: What measures can airlines implement to avert such incidents?

A:

Airlines can conduct routine system audits, improve incident response strategies, invest in cutting-edge cybersecurity technology, and provide employee training to mitigate risks.

“PsiQuantum’s Efforts for Openness Miss the Mark at the Last Minute”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

PsiQuantum Funding Agreement and Transparency Issues

Quick Overview

  • PsiQuantum secured $940 million in funding from the federal and Queensland governments for a quantum computing initiative.
  • Crucial documents pertaining to the agreement remain significantly redacted or unreleased, raising concerns about transparency.
  • The federal government cited “public interest immunity” to defend its decision to withhold information.
  • The funding arrangement includes plans for a regional headquarters in Australia and aims to have a quantum computer operational in Brisbane by 2027.
  • Following a change in administration, the Queensland government has placed the investment under review.
  • A federal audit of the agreement is also being considered.
  • Critics contend the deal lacks adequate scrutiny and transparency, urging further investigation.

Transparency Issues with the PsiQuantum Agreement

The Australian Senate’s efforts to obtain essential documents regarding PsiQuantum’s $940 million funding deal have encountered obstacles. Although some documents were released, they were significantly redacted, providing little clarity on the specifics of the agreement. The federal government justified its actions by invoking “public interest immunity,” asserting that disclosing the truth would not align with public interest.

PsiQuantum funding agreement raises transparency issues in Australia

What We Know About PsiQuantum’s $940 Million Investment

PsiQuantum, a US-based quantum computing firm, obtained nearly $1 billion in funding after presenting an unsolicited proposal in 2022. The arrangement includes the establishment of a regional headquarters in Australia and the development of a quantum computer in Brisbane, set to be operational by 2027. However, the deal’s opacity has attracted criticism from multiple angles.

Documents Not Released

The Senate specifically sought access to several vital documents, including details of PsiQuantum’s unsolicited proposal, a non-disclosure agreement, a list of technological milestones, and a Deloitte analysis that guided the investment decision. None of these were disclosed, and the Senate’s request for document production was only “partially fulfilled.”

Critique and Demands for Accountability

Paul Fletcher, Shadow Minister for Government Services and the Digital Economy, has been outspoken about the necessity for transparency. He referred to the deal as a “reverse engineered sham” intended to benefit an American firm and emphasized that Australian taxpayers deserve clarity on the specifics of such a major investment.

Fletcher has also advocated for a parliamentary investigation to examine the funding agreement further, reflecting widespread public unease regarding the lack of accountability.

Concerns at the State Level and Federal Audit

The Queensland government, which initially endorsed the deal, has experienced an administrative shift. The new government has revisited the investment, introducing further uncertainty into PsiQuantum’s overall strategy. A federal audit of the $940 million investment is also being contemplated, further underscoring the contentious nature of the agreement.

A Quantum Advancement or a Slip-Up?

Quantum computing is an emerging technology with revolutionary potential, yet the PsiQuantum agreement raises important questions about how governments should reconcile innovation with accountability. While the potential for a quantum computer operational by 2027 is appealing, the lack of transparency creates doubts about what could be a pivotal milestone for Australia’s technology sector.

Conclusion

The $940 million funding agreement between PsiQuantum and the Australian and Queensland governments is facing scrutiny due to its opacity. Despite the ambitious objective of having a quantum computer operational in Brisbane by 2027, heavily redacted documents and withheld information have prompted public and political apprehensions. Critics are demanding more accountability to ensure taxpayer funds are judiciously used, while both state and federal audits hang over the project.

Q&A

Q: What is the $940 million funding agreement with PsiQuantum?

A:

PsiQuantum has secured nearly $1 billion in funding from the Australian federal and Queensland governments to set up a regional headquarters in Australia and construct a quantum computer in Brisbane, expected to be operational by 2027.

Q: What are the grounds for criticism regarding the agreement?

A:

Criticism arises from the lack of transparency, as fundamental documents linked to the agreement have been heavily redacted or withheld. Detractors argue that this hinders adequate oversight of public fund usage.

Q: What does “public interest immunity” mean?

A:

“Public interest immunity” is a legal concept allowing governments to conceal information if its release is considered not to be in the public’s best interest. The Australian federal government has cited this to justify the non-disclosure of documents related to the PsiQuantum agreement.

Q: What is the current status of the investment?

A:

The Queensland government has initiated a review of the investment following a change in administration, and a federal audit into the agreement is being pondered.

Q: Who is advocating for increased transparency?

A:

Paul Fletcher, Shadow Minister for Government Services and the Digital Economy, has been a leading advocate for transparency. He has also called for a parliamentary inquiry into the deal.

Q: What potential benefits does this agreement hold?

A:

If successful, the agreement could position Australia as a leader in quantum computing, with a fully operational quantum computer opening new possibilities in technology, healthcare, and industry.

Q: What is the timeline for the quantum computer?

A:

PsiQuantum intends to have the quantum computer operational in Brisbane by 2027, although this timeline could be affected by audits or reviews.

“Charging Into the Holiday Season: Countless New EV Charging Stations Launched Throughout Australia”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Preparing For the Future of EV Charging: The Rise of High-Capacity EV Cables Among Australians

Brief Overview

  • A plethora of new EV charging stations are being established throughout Australia, facilitating travel for EV owners this holiday season.
  • Destination charging is increasingly recognized as a viable option alongside home and DC fast charging, particularly in rural regions.
  • Numerous EV chargers obligate users to provide their own charging cables, encouraging EV owners to adopt high-capacity, future-ready cables.
  • Arlec offers a selection of Type 2 charging cables, available in speeds ranging from 4.6kW to 22kW.
  • Choosing the right charging cable hinges on the vehicle’s maximum charging capability, the cable’s power rating, and the charger present at the destination.
  • Bunnings has emerged as a handy spot for acquiring EV chargers and accessories, including options compatible with Tesla.

Grasping Destination Charging in Australia

With the increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) in Australia, discussions around charging alternatives are gaining traction. While many EV users depend on home charging or DC fast chargers during travels, destination charging is becoming a pivotal third alternative. Tailored for extended stays, like overnight hotel visits, destination chargers provide a slower charge than DC fast chargers, but they allow you to recharge while resting or sightseeing.

Destination chargers are particularly crucial in regional towns where fast chargers may be limited. These chargers often necessitate drivers to supply their own cables, adding a degree of complexity for unprepared EV owners. This trend is motivating numerous Australians to invest in portable charging cables to ensure they’re equipped for any eventuality.

Selecting the Appropriate EV Charging Cable

Why Bringing Your Own Cables Is Becoming Common

Many newly established charging stations favor lower-cost configurations without attached cables, compelling drivers to bring their own. This trend is prominent on platforms such as Plugshare, where users can evaluate charging alternatives before embarking on their journeys. For those who often utilize destination chargers, possessing a dependable cable is becoming a necessity.

The Arlec Cable Collection: Key Insights

Arlec’s collection of EV charging cables encompasses a variety of choices to cater to diverse needs. All cables are equipped with Type 2 connectors, which is the Australian standard for AC charging. However, they differ in power support, ranging from single-phase 4.6kW to three-phase 22kW. Prices escalate with higher power ratings, so choosing the correct cable relies on your individual requirements.

Ensuring Your Investment Stays Relevant

When selecting a cable, it is crucial to account for not only your current vehicle but also potential future requirements. For instance, if your vehicle’s maximum charging capacity is 11kW, a 22kW cable might appear unnecessary. However, acquiring a higher-capacity cable guarantees compatibility with faster-charging EVs you might possess in the future. This forward-thinking strategy can prevent the need to purchase an additional cable later.

The Three Essential Elements of EV Charging

The Vehicle

The onboard charger in your car dictates the maximum charging speed. For example, the Tesla Model Y can charge up to 11kW on a three-phase connection, potentially adding around 75km of range each hour.

The Cable

The cable serves as the link between your vehicle and the charging station. Higher-capacity cables, like Arlec’s 22kW option, are intended to facilitate quicker charging speeds if supported by both the vehicle and charger.

The Charger

The charging station itself represents the concluding link in the chain. While numerous DC fast chargers come with attached cables, destination chargers generally require users to bring their own. Consequently, investing in a versatile cable proves to be a vital asset for travels or stays in regional areas.

Where to Purchase EV Chargers and Cables in Australia

Bunnings has become a preferred retailer for EV charging accessories, providing a variety of choices for both Tesla and non-Tesla automobiles. With several locations throughout Australia, it serves as a practical option for EV owners aiming to enhance their charging arrangements. Not every store provides the entire range, so it’s advisable to check online for availability or visit a nearby store with an expanded selection.

Conclusion

As Australia enhances its EV charging infrastructure, destination charging is becoming an increasingly vital option, especially for travel in regional areas. Investing in a high-capacity, future-ready charging cable guarantees that EV owners are prepared for numerous charging scenarios. With stores like Bunnings making these products more widely available, now is an opportune moment to improve your EV charging arrangements for the path ahead.

FAQs Regarding EV Charging in Australia

Q: What is destination charging, and why does it matter?

A:

Destination charging pertains to slower chargers situated at locations where you might stay for several hours or overnight, such as hotels. It is essential for regional travel where fast chargers may not be accessible.

Q: Why do some charging stations require users to bring their own cables?

A:

To keep expenses down, many charging providers set up chargers without attached cables. Consequently, drivers must bring their own Type 2 cable to connect their vehicle.

Q: How do I select the proper EV charging cable?

A:

Evaluate your vehicle’s maximum charging capacity, the cable’s power rating, and the types of chargers you expect to utilize. Investing in a higher-capacity cable can safeguard your setup for faster EVs in the future.

Q: Are destination chargers free of charge?

A:

Not necessarily. Some locations may impose a fee for electricity, while others incorporate charging costs within their service offerings.

Q: Can I find EV chargers and cables at Bunnings?

A:

Absolutely, Bunnings carries a variety of EV chargers and cables, including options compatible with Tesla. Availability may vary from one location to another.

Q: Is it worth investing in a 22kW cable if my car only supports 11kW?

A:

Yes, a 22kW cable guarantees compatibility with future vehicles that could support faster charging, making it a sensible long-term investment.

“Microsoft Enhances 365 Copilot by Incorporating Non-OpenAI Models”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Microsoft Enhances 365 Copilot AI with Non-OpenAI Models | TechBest

Microsoft Enhances AI Integration for 365 Copilot

Quick Overview

  • Microsoft is incorporating non-OpenAI models into Microsoft 365 Copilot to lower expenses and boost efficiency.
  • The transition focuses on diversifying its AI ecosystem and reducing reliance on OpenAI’s GPT-4 model.
  • Proprietary AI models like Phi-4 and third-party open-weight models are being tailored for business applications.
  • Considerations regarding cost and speed play a crucial role in this strategic shift.
  • Microsoft continues to work alongside OpenAI while actively assessing alternative AI solutions.
  • As of November 2023, 70% of Fortune 500 firms are utilizing Microsoft 365 Copilot, with analysts anticipating over 10 million paid subscribers in 2024.

Reasons for Microsoft’s Shift from OpenAI Models

Microsoft has made a crucial move to broaden its AI offerings by incorporating non-OpenAI models into its Microsoft 365 Copilot solution. This initiative arises from increasing apprehensions about the reliance on OpenAI’s GPT-4 model, which has been pivotal to the enterprise-oriented AI assistant since its inception in March 2023.

The company’s strategy is driven by two central motives: optimizing costs and enhancing speed and efficiency for enterprise clients. By utilizing smaller in-house models such as Phi-4 and refining open-weight models, Microsoft seeks to offer a more economical AI alternative without compromising performance standards.

Microsoft incorporates new AI models in 365 Copilot

Evolution of Microsoft’s AI Ecosystem

Microsoft’s initiatives to diversify the AI framework of its products correspond with wider industry trends. GitHub, a Microsoft-owned entity, has recently rolled out models from Anthropic and Google as alternatives to OpenAI’s GPT-4, indicating a more significant shift in AI strategies. Concurrently, Microsoft’s consumer-facing Copilot chatbot has started integrating both proprietary and OpenAI models.

For Microsoft 365 Copilot, this progression signifies providing enterprise clients with a more enriched and adaptable AI experience. The potential for integrating smaller, tailored models could result in quicker responses and potentially lowered costs for users, making the service more attractive for businesses mindful of their budgets.

Adoption and Obstacles in the Corporate Sector

Despite its potential, Microsoft 365 Copilot is still demonstrating its value to business clients. Concerns over costs and effectiveness have hindered widespread adoption, with many organizations remaining in pilot phases. A Gartner analysis of 152 IT firms indicated that most have yet to fully embrace the AI assistant.

Nonetheless, signs of growth are promising. As of November 2023, Microsoft disclosed that 70% of Fortune 500 companies had adopted 365 Copilot. Analysts at BNP Paribas Exane forecast that the platform will surpass 10 million paid users by late 2024, highlighting an increasing acceptance of AI-driven productivity tools in the workplace.

Implications for Corporate AI Users

For Australian businesses, Microsoft’s efforts to diversify could lead to more economical and effective AI tools. The prospective savings from utilizing smaller, in-house models may be transferred to enterprises, making AI more accessible across diverse industries.

Additionally, with the amalgamation of various AI models, Microsoft 365 Copilot is set to evolve into a more versatile asset, capable of meeting a broad spectrum of industry requirements. This could render it an invaluable resource for Australian companies aiming to enhance operations and maintain competitiveness in a technology-driven environment.

Conclusion

Microsoft’s choice to introduce non-OpenAI models into its 365 Copilot product signifies a critical juncture in the tech giant’s AI trajectory. By diversifying its model array, Microsoft aims to cut costs, enhance efficiency, and deliver a more potent AI solution for enterprise clients. While challenges persist in validating the platform’s worth, the increasing uptake among Fortune 500 companies suggests a favorable outlook for this AI assistant.

Q&A: Key Insights

Q: What’s driving Microsoft to move away from sole reliance on OpenAI models?

A:

Microsoft seeks to lower costs, increase speed, and diversify its AI framework by introducing in-house and third-party models alongside OpenAI’s GPT-4.

Q: What advantages does the integration of non-OpenAI models into Microsoft 365 Copilot offer?

A:

Non-OpenAI models can reduce operational costs, heighten response speed, and provide enhanced flexibility in tailoring AI solutions to fit business requirements.

Q: Are OpenAI models still included in Microsoft 365 Copilot?

A:

Yes, OpenAI models continue to play a vital role in 365 Copilot. Microsoft is enhancing these capabilities with in-house and third-party models to improve overall functionality.

Q: How prevalent is Microsoft 365 Copilot in the corporate sector?

A:

Currently, 70% of Fortune 500 companies are utilizing 365 Copilot. Analysts forecast over 10 million paid users by the end of 2024.

Q: Will this diversification influence the pricing of Microsoft 365 Copilot for customers?

A:

Yes, potentially. By employing smaller, lower-cost models, Microsoft may consider passing some savings on to users.

Q: What challenges does Microsoft encounter with 365 Copilot adoption?

A:

Major challenges include demonstrating return on investment, resolving pricing concerns, and facilitating user transitions beyond pilot testing.

“iClever BTH20: An In-Depth Evaluation of ANC Headphones Tailored for Children”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

iClever BTH20: An In-Depth Look at Kid-Friendly ANC Headphones

Quick Overview

  • Volume-limiting features secure safe listening levels for children (options of 74dB, 85dB, and 94dB).
  • Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) diminishes surrounding sound, perfect for travel or concentrated activities.
  • Ergonomic design with cushioned earcups and an adjustable headband for extended listening comfort.
  • Bluetooth 5.2 and wired options provide flexible use.
  • Battery duration: Up to 50 hours without ANC, 35 hours with ANC active.
  • Foldable and robust design makes it portable and suitable for everyday use by kids.
  • Retail price around A$79.99, representing great value for mid-tier children’s headphones.

Design Features

The iClever BTH20 ANC headphones are designed specifically for kids, showcasing cheerful, vibrant colors such as blue-green and pink with playful cat ear details. The tough plastic build guarantees longevity, while the adjustable headband allows for a snug fit on different head sizes. Soft leather-like padding on the earcups ensures comfort during prolonged listening, which was endorsed by my daughter during our test.

The on-ear structure enables children to have awareness of their surroundings, enhancing safety. The easily accessible controls on the right earcup include a power/play button, volume adjustments, and an ANC switch. Moreover, a 3.5mm audio port and a USB-C charging connection augment its usability.

iClever BTH20 Kids ANC Headphones Design Overview

Performance Overview

Safety is a top priority, and the iClever BTH20 achieves this with three volume-limiting settings: 74dB for quieter places, 85dB for typical use, and 94dB for occasional use in louder environments. These settings meet international safe listening standards for children.

Sound performance is unexpectedly solid for children’s headphones, providing clear, well-balanced audio suitable for music, audiobooks, and learning materials. The ANC function, while not as advanced as those found in premium adult options, effectively dampens surrounding noise, making it beneficial for travel or focused tasks like homework.

Pairing via Bluetooth is effortless, and transitioning between wireless and wired modes is straightforward. With a battery capacity lasting up to 50 hours (ANC disabled) and 35 hours (ANC activated), these headphones are ideal for long trips or daily school activities.

Key Features

  • Volume Limiting: Select from 74dB, 85dB, or 94dB for safe audio levels.
  • ANC: Diminishes background noise for improved sound clarity without increasing the volume.
  • Bluetooth 5.2: Dependable, energy-efficient wireless connection.
  • Wired Connectivity: Utilize the 3.5mm audio cable when needed.
  • USB-C Charging: Quick and reliable charging.
  • Built-in Microphone: Facilitates online classes and hands-free calls.
  • Compact Design: Foldable for convenient storage and transport.
  • Comfortable Fit: Plush ear cushions and adjustable headband for prolonged use.

Challenges and Potential Enhancements

Although the iClever BTH20 shines in several aspects, there remain some areas for enhancement:

  • Haptic Feedback: Providing feedback from buttons could assist younger users.
  • Improved ANC: Fine-tuning ANC to block higher-frequency noises would be advantageous.
  • Carrying Case: A protective case or pouch would be a valuable addition.
  • Increased Colour Variety: Offering more solid colors or designs could appeal to a wider audience.

Price and Where to Buy

In Australia, the iClever BTH20 ANC Kids Headphones are available through online channels such as Amazon, priced at approximately A$79.99. This mid-range pricing makes them a practical option for parents looking for quality and features at an affordable cost.

For further information or to make a purchase, visit the official product page at iClever’s website.

Conclusion

The iClever BTH20 ANC Kids Headphones offer a combination of safety, comfort, and performance in a robust, child-friendly format. With features such as volume limiting, ANC, and impressive battery longevity, they represent a wise choice for parents who value their child’s hearing health. Although there is room for advancements in ANC effectiveness and color selections, the BTH20 distinguishes itself as a commendable mid-range alternative in the Australian market.

FAQs

Q: What makes these headphones appropriate for children?

A:

Essential features like volume-limiting technology, cushioned ear pads, and an adjustable headband provide safety and comfort for kids.

Q: How well does the ANC feature work?

A:

The ANC effectively reduces environmental noise, such as airplane sounds or household disturbances, although it may not be as effective as higher-end adult models.

Q: Is it possible to use the headphones without Bluetooth?

A:

Absolutely, the headphones come with a 3.5mm audio cable for wired connections, allowing them to be used with various devices.

Q: Are they sturdy enough for daily wear?

A:

Yes, the tough plastic design and foldable structure make them ideal for everyday use by children.

Q: What is the battery life like?

A:

The battery performance is impressive, lasting up to 50 hours without ANC and 35 hours with it activated.

Q: Are any extra accessories included?

A:

The headphones come with a USB-C charging cable and 3.5mm audio cable, but a carrying case is not provided.

Q: Where can I find the iClever BTH20 in Australia?

A:

They can be found at online retailers such as Amazon Australia or purchased directly from the iClever website.

“Apple Ramps Up to Defend Google’s Billion-Dollar Search Engine Agreements”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Apple Moves in Google’s Antitrust Trial

Quick Read

  • Apple is stepping into Google’s US antitrust trial regarding its supremacy in online search.
  • Google compensates Apple about $32 billion each year to keep Google as the default search engine on Safari.
  • Apple contends that Google can no longer adequately represent their combined interests because of the trial’s breadth.
  • Apple plans to summon witnesses for the trial set for April 2025.
  • This case could compel Google to divest Chrome or Android in order to enhance competition.
  • Google suggests relaxing agreements with partners but aims to keep ad revenue-sharing arrangements intact.
  • This seminal case has the potential to reshape global access to online information.

Apple Joins the Fray in Google’s Antitrust Conflict

Apple has emerged as a key player in Google’s significant US antitrust trial, submitting a motion to engage as a third party. Central to this legal conflict is the lucrative revenue-sharing arrangement between the two tech leaders, where Google significantly compensates Apple to ensure its status as the default search engine for the Safari browser.

With Apple reportedly garnering USD $20 billion (AUD $32 billion) from this collaboration in the past year, the stakes have escalated dramatically. Amidst the US Department of Justice (DOJ) seeking to dismantle Google’s purported monopoly in online search, Apple has claimed that it cannot depend on Google to sufficiently safeguard their shared interests in the courtroom.

Reasons Behind Apple’s Decision

No Intentions to Develop a Competing Search Engine

A surprising aspect of Apple’s court submissions is its acknowledgment that it does not plan to establish a rival search engine, regardless of how the trial unfolds. This stance emphasizes Apple’s dependence on its profitable revenue-sharing pact with Google, which has become a vital source of income for the company.

This decision reveals Apple’s strategic partnership with Google in this domain, even as both firms compete in other areas like mobile hardware and software.

Consequences for Google

Potential Breakup of the Monopoly

The DOJ is exploring strategies that could drastically transform Google’s business framework. Prosecutors are likely to assert that Google’s market dominance in online search hampers competition, advocating severe actions like requiring the sale of its Chrome browser or Android operating system.

Such developments would signify a major shift, redefining not just Google’s operations but also the broader technology landscape. Apple’s participation adds another layer of intricacy to an already formidable case.

Google’s Suggested Changes

To address the DOJ’s apprehensions, Google has proposed relaxing its default agreements with browser developers, mobile device creators, and telecom carriers. However, the tech company has refrained from eliminating its ad revenue-sharing contracts, a crucial issue for the prosecutors.

This initiative reflects Google’s attempt to hold onto its control in the search sector while satisfying regulatory concerns, though it remains uncertain if these actions will be considered adequate.

A Pivotal Case for the Technology Sector

The Google antitrust suit is poised to be one of the most notable legal confrontations in the history of the tech industry. Its resolution could transform how individuals engage with online information, potentially paving the way for new contenders in the search engine arena.

As Apple positions itself as a crucial figure in this legal drama, the implications of the trial are anticipated to reach far beyond the courtroom, impacting consumers, enterprises, and regulatory systems globally.

Summary

Apple’s choice to participate in Google’s antitrust trial highlights the immense stakes involved in sustaining its billion-dollar relationship with the search entity. While Google grapples with the pressure to reshape its business practices, Apple’s strategic actions underscore its dependence on the lucrative revenue-sharing arrangement. The outcome of the trial could yield profound consequences for the technology sector, competition legislation, and the dynamics of online search.

Q&A: Essential Information

Q: Why is Apple joining Google’s antitrust trial?

A:

Apple is getting involved to safeguard its interests in its financial agreement with Google, which it worries may not be adequately defended by Google during the trial.

Q: How much does Apple earn from its contract with Google?

A:

Apple reportedly acquired USD $20 billion (AUD $32 billion) in 2022 from its arrangement with Google to establish it as the default search engine on Safari.

Q: What are the goals of the US Department of Justice?

A:

The DOJ intends to dismantle Google’s control over the online search market, which may involve compelling it to sell its Chrome browser or Android operating system to restore market competition.

Q: Is Apple aiming to develop its own search engine?

A:

No, Apple has confirmed it has no plans to create a competing search engine, irrespective of the trial’s outcome.

Q: What could occur if Google loses the trial?

A:

If Google loses, it may undergo major restructuring, potentially selling key assets like Chrome or Android, along with modifications to its revenue-sharing agreements.

Q: How could this trial affect competition in the tech sector?

A:

The trial could allow more competitors to enter the search engine market, fostering innovation and possibly enhancing services for consumers.

“Marriott and Starwood Required to Implement Extensive Security Revamp”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Marriott and Starwood Hotels Mandated to Enhance Cybersecurity Protocols

Marriott and Starwood Hotels Mandated to Enhance Cybersecurity Protocols

Brief Overview

  • The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is taking action against Marriott and Starwood Hotels & Resorts following three substantial data breaches.
  • These breaches compromised personal data of 344 million individuals, encompassing passport numbers and credit card information.
  • The FTC has mandated a thorough information security initiative to bolster Marriott’s data protection strategies.
  • Critical measures involve appointing a leader for the security program, adopting multi-factor authentication, and ensuring compliance from vendors.
  • In addition, consistent employee training and strong incident response strategies are included in the directives.
  • The security deficiencies underscored the necessity for transparency in data management and proactive cybersecurity practices.

Background: Data Breaches That Provoked Regulatory Action

Marriott International and its subsidiary Starwood Hotels & Resorts found themselves in the cybersecurity spotlight after encountering three major data breaches. These events compromised personal information of around 344 million customers worldwide, including sensitive data such as passport numbers, payment card information, and loyalty program records. The incidents occurred between 2014 and 2018, with problems initially associated with Starwood’s outdated systems prior to Marriott’s acquisition in 2016.

The breaches raised significant alarms regarding the hospitality group’s data security protocols, drawing the attention of the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

FTC Directives: Extensive Revision of Security Protocols

To rectify the discovered deficiencies, the FTC has ordered Marriott and Starwood to apply a comprehensive information security strategy. The required program encompasses:

  • Designating a specific leader to manage cybersecurity initiatives.
  • Delivering regular governance reports and tracking advancements.
  • Implementing multi-factor authentication for remote IT access.
  • Setting up strong logging and monitoring frameworks.
  • Ensuring that all staff receive training on protecting personal data.
  • Creating incident response plans to diminish the impact of future breaches.

Moreover, Marriott must evaluate and govern third-party vendors to guarantee they adhere to equivalent security standards as the corporation itself. This step is pivotal, as supply chain weaknesses frequently lead to data breaches.

The Claims: False Representation of Security Measures

The FTC’s allegations extend beyond the breaches themselves; they also pertain to Marriott’s purported misrepresentation of its data security practices. The commission charged the company with inadequately disclosing threats associated with its outdated systems, resulting in the compromise of consumer data on an unprecedented scale. This case emphasizes the necessity of transparency and accountability in corporate data management.

Consequences for Businesses and Consumers

This case acts as a warning for businesses regarding the necessity of proactive cybersecurity. Organizations must emphasize regular audits, employee training, and the integration of advanced security measures to safeguard customer information. Furthermore, companies purchasing other enterprises should conduct thorough due diligence on IT systems to detect and rectify vulnerabilities swiftly.

For consumers, the Marriott incident showcases the importance of being vigilant in overseeing personal accounts and exercising caution when sharing sensitive information. With the increasing occurrence of data breaches, individuals must take preventive actions to protect themselves, including utilizing strong passwords and activating multi-factor authentication wherever feasible.

Conclusion

The FTC’s measures against Marriott and Starwood Hotels signify a pivotal moment in cybersecurity enforcement. It underscores the global necessity for stringent data protection protocols, transparency in personal information management, and ongoing vigilance against cyber threats. With 344 million customers affected, this case serves as a crucial alert for enterprises globally to prioritize and fortify their cybersecurity frameworks.

Questions & Answers

Q: What instigated the FTC’s action against Marriott and Starwood?

A: The FTC’s intervention was triggered by three significant data breaches that affected the personal information of 344 million customers worldwide. The commission also alleged the company misrepresented its data security practices.

Q: What are the essential elements of the mandated security strategy?

A: The strategy entails appointing a cybersecurity leader, implementing multi-factor authentication, ensuring employee training, formulating incident response plans, and overseeing vendor compliance.

Q: How does this situation affect other businesses?

A: The case highlights the necessity for strong cybersecurity measures, transparency, and routine audits for all businesses. It serves as a reminder to prioritize data security and address vulnerabilities without delay.

Q: What actions can consumers take to safeguard themselves?

A: Consumers should vigilantly monitor their accounts for any suspicious activity, use strong and unique passwords, enable multi-factor authentication, and exercise caution when disclosing personal information online.

Q: Were the breaches connected to Starwood’s systems?

A: Yes, the breaches were initially traced back to vulnerabilities in Starwood’s outdated systems, which Marriott took over after its acquisition in 2016.

Q: How does the FTC ensure compliance with its mandates?

A: The FTC ensures compliance through periodic reporting requirements, audits, and the possibility of additional penalties if companies fail to fulfill their obligations.

For more updates and technology news, visit TechBest.

“Why It’s Essential for Every Victorian to Have the VicEmergency App on Their Phone Prior to Boxing Day”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Stay Protected This Fire Season: The Importance of the VicEmergency App for Victorians

Quick Summary: Important Points

  • Victoria is under significant bushfire threat this Boxing Day, with some regions forecasted to exceed 40°C.
  • The VicEmergency app delivers immediate alerts, incident maps, and emergency advisories to ensure user safety and awareness.
  • Functions like Watch Zones and GPS capabilities provide customized notifications for particular areas.
  • Downloading the app is free and crucial for being prepared for fire season.
  • Hot, dry, and windy weather forms a precarious setting for bushfires, prominently in areas such as Wimmera and Mallee.
  • Make sure the app is downloaded and notifications are activated on your device before Boxing Day.

Boxing Day Fire Dangers Throughout Victoria

As Boxing Day approaches, Victoria is preparing for harsh weather that greatly elevates bushfire risks. The temperature in Melbourne is predicted to reach a searing 39°C, which could set records for the Boxing Day Test cricket match. Northern towns like Mildura and Swan Hill are likely to see temperatures of 42°C, whereas Bendigo may experience 40°C. Central and eastern regions, including Ballarat and Wangaratta, could see temperatures from 38°C to 39°C.

Strong winds combined with humidity below 10% will intensify fire risks, making regions like Wimmera, Mallee, and Northern Country especially at risk. These areas may face catastrophic and extreme fire danger ratings, while South Gippsland and other regions will encounter high fire danger alerts.

The Significance of the VicEmergency App

The VicEmergency app offers more than mere convenience—it’s a vital resource intended to keep you informed amid emergencies. Recent fires, such as the 34,000-hectare inferno in the Grampians and the 22,000-hectare fire near Beaufort, underscore the necessity of remaining updated. These events have prompted evacuations, road closures, and emergency notices, highlighting the demand for trustworthy, real-time data.

This app features a comprehensive range of tools, with live incident maps, personalized Watch Zones, GPS location alerts, and updates on total fire bans. It ensures you’re among the first to learn about emerging emergencies, facilitating prompt and informed choices.

Steps to Download the VicEmergency App

For iOS Devices

Access the App Store on your iPhone or iPad. Search for “VicEmergency” and click Get. Confirm that notifications are turned on in your phone settings for real-time alerts.

For Android Devices

Launch the Google Play Store, look up “VicEmergency,” and press Install. Permit location access for personalized alerts based on your location.

Web App

If you prefer using a web browser, the VicEmergency site provides similar capabilities. Visit https://www.emergency.vic.gov.au/respond for the latest updates.

VicEmergency App Features

Live Incident Map

Monitor real-time updates on current warnings, planned burns, and emergency incidents throughout Victoria. The map symbols identify affected areas.

Watch Zones

Create customized zones to keep tabs on specific locations like your residence, workplace, or vacation spot. Receive tailored alerts for these areas.

GPS Functionality

The app utilizes GPS to pinpoint your location, providing alerts applicable to your surroundings, whether at home or on the go.

Emergency Alerts

Gain access to comprehensive information about bushfires, floods, storms, and other threats through three alert levels: Advice, Watch and Act, and Emergency Warning.

Updates on Total Fire Bans

Stay updated on today’s and tomorrow’s fire ban status to safely plan your activities.

Customized Alerts

Adjust your notification sounds and opt for email alerts to enhance visibility.

Community Safety

Disseminate incident information to friends and family directly through the app to foster community preparedness.

Educational Materials

Access resources on how to respond during emergencies, assisting you and your loved ones in staying safe.

Overview

The VicEmergency app is an essential resource for every Victorian, especially during the peak bushfire season. With predictions pointing to deteriorating conditions on Boxing Day, the app offers timely alerts, critical updates, and safety tools to ensure you remain prepared. Download it today to protect your family and community.

FAQs Regarding the VicEmergency App

Q: Is the VicEmergency app free?

A:

Yes, it is completely free to download and use on both iOS and Android platforms.

Q: Can I access the app without turning on GPS?

A:

Yes, but enabling GPS allows you to receive alerts specific to your location, which is particularly helpful when traveling.

Q: How frequently does the app provide updates?

A:

The app gives real-time updates, ensuring that you are notified of the latest information as soon as it’s available.

Q: Can I track alerts for several locations?

A:

Yes, you can create multiple Watch Zones to receive alerts for various places, such as your home, office, or vacation area.

Q: Does the app include alerts for risks beyond bushfires?

A:

Yes, it provides warnings for various hazards, including floods, storms, and other emergencies.

Q: What can I do to avoid missing notifications?

A:

Ensure notifications are activated in your phone settings and personalize alert tones in the app for better visibility.

Q: Is the app enough for bushfire readiness?

A:

While the app is a vital resource, it should be used alongside other preparedness strategies such as emergency kits, evacuation routes, and gathering information through various channels.

“Government Completes Framework for Evaluating Technology Suppliers”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Australia’s Updated Framework for Evaluating Technology Suppliers: A Strategic Initiative

Quick Overview

  • The Australian government has completed a framework to evaluate national security and supply chain threats posed by technology suppliers.
  • This framework was established under the 2023-2030 Cyber Security Strategy.
  • To safeguard national security and uphold the integrity of its processes, the framework will remain confidential.
  • It seeks to strike a balance between security and innovation, facilitating secure access to advanced technologies for Australian entities.
  • Engaging with organizations and end-users will be essential to the evaluation process.
  • Key areas of focus include reducing risks associated with vendors linked to foreign governments with opposing interests.

An In-Depth Examination of the Framework

The Australian government has launched a thorough “review framework” intended to evaluate potential national security and supply chain issues linked to technology suppliers. This initiative arises from the 2023-2030 Cyber Security Strategy, which highlights the urgent need to mitigate risks from foreign-controlled technologies entering the Australian sector.

As stated by Minister for Home Affairs and Cyber Security, Tony Burke, the framework is crafted to safeguard Australia’s national interests while ensuring the confidentiality of its procedures. “Most vendors do not pose a risk to Australia’s interests,” Burke highlighted. Nevertheless, the framework aims to address scenarios where foreign involvement in technology products might threaten national security.

Technology risk review framework established by Australian government

Principal Aims of the Framework

Safeguarding National Security

The main purpose of the framework is to detect technologies or suppliers that may endanger Australia due to their affiliations with foreign governments. Suppliers with access to confidential systems or data are particularly concerning. The framework aims to mitigate risks as needed, fostering a secure landscape for the Australian economy and its essential infrastructure.

Harmonizing Innovation and Security

The government has highlighted the necessity of harmonizing innovation with security. By providing a structured method for risk assessment, the framework enables Australian organizations to safely engage with innovative technologies while protecting national interests. This dual focus promotes both economic advancement and security robustness.

Consultation as a Fundamental Element

A notable aspect of the framework is its focus on collaboration and consultation. The government intends to actively involve organisations, industry stakeholders, and end-users to comprehend the risks posed by particular technologies and any current mitigation strategies. This inclusive approach seeks to instill trust and ensure the framework’s efficacy across diverse sectors.

Importance of the Framework

With the growing adoption of global technologies, it is imperative to ensure that Australia remains shielded from foreign meddling. By addressing potential risks at the vendor level, the framework serves as a proactive measure against cyber threats, data breaches, and the exploitation of sensitive information. It also complements Australia’s broader strategy to enhance its cybersecurity readiness in an increasingly interconnected landscape.

Conclusion

The newly established framework by the Australian government for evaluating technology supplier risks marks a crucial advancement in protecting national security and the supply chain. Created under the 2023-2030 Cyber Security Strategy, this framework is intended to identify and mitigate risks associated with foreign-controlled technologies. By emphasizing consultation and finding a balance between security and innovation, Australia aims to enable its organizations to adopt new technologies securely and effectively.

Q&A: Clarifying the Technology Supplier Review Framework

Q: What is the intent of the technology vendor review framework?

A:

The framework is geared towards assessing and mitigating national security and supply chain vulnerabilities posed by technology providers and their offerings, especially those linked to foreign governments.

Q: Why is the framework not public?

A:

To preserve the integrity of its processes and safeguard classified national security details, the government has chosen not to disclose the framework publicly.

Q: How does the framework maintain a balance between security and innovation?

A:

The framework facilitates Australian organizations in adopting new technologies securely while managing risks. It encourages innovation by allowing access to cutting-edge solutions without compromising national security.

Q: Who will participate in consultations during the review process?

A:

The government will reach out to organizations, industry players, and end-users to discern risks linked to specific technologies and any existing mitigation measures currently in place.

Q: What kinds of risks does the framework cover?

A:

The framework addresses risks where vendors, via their technologies, could be swayed by foreign governments to act against Australia’s national interests. This includes risks related to sensitive data and vital infrastructure.

Q: How does this framework integrate with Australia’s broader cybersecurity strategy?

A:

The framework is part of the 2023-2030 Cyber Security Strategy, which seeks to bolster Australia’s cybersecurity framework and address vulnerabilities in an increasingly digital environment.

Q: Will this framework affect all technology suppliers?

A:

No, the framework mainly targets suppliers whose products or services may present national security challenges. The majority of suppliers are not expected to be impacted as they do not pose a threat to Australia’s interests.