Australia Tech News - Page 29 of 106 - Techbest - Top Tech Reviews In Australia

Optus Recovers, Adding 238,000 Fresh Customers in the Last Year


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Quick Overview: Optus Bounces Back with Robust Mobile-Led Growth

  • Optus gains 238,000 additional mobile subscribers in the fiscal year ending March 2025
  • EBITDA grows by 5.7% and EBIT soars 55% year-on-year
  • Prepaid brand amaysim significantly contributes to expansion
  • Mobile service revenue rises by 4.1%, with ARPU increasing by 2.4%
  • Collaborative efforts with TPG Telecom and Aussie Broadband enhance network and customer outreach
  • Taking over Circles.Life Australia broadens Optus’s service range
  • Home internet revenue sees a 3.9% increase, propelled by NBN and Fixed Wireless Access

Mobile Sector Growth Fuels Optus’s Comeback

For the full year concluded on 31 March 2025, Optus has demonstrated a notable financial recovery, driven by strong customer acquisition in the mobile sector. The company welcomed 238,000 new mobile users, comprising 52,000 new postpaid clients alongside significant contributions from its prepaid brand, amaysim, allowing the telecom operator to thrive in a fiercely competitive landscape.

EBITDA increased by 5.7%, while EBIT experienced a remarkable year-on-year leap of 55%, indicating solid profitability and greater operational efficiency. Optus’s renewed focus on value, dependability, and customer satisfaction seems to be producing positive outcomes.

Optus witnesses robust mobile growth by adding 238,000 new clients in FY2025

CEO Stephen Rue Discusses Restoring Trust and Providing Options

Stephen Rue, CEO of Optus, recognized the company’s journey of transformation and its commitment to restoring customer trust. “While there’s still progress to be made, these results indicate we are heading in the correct direction. Our mobile achievements, spearheaded by amaysim, showcase our dedication to offering Australians genuine choices in telecommunications,” Rue stated.

Rue emphasized that Optus’s focus on enhancing customer experience, ensuring network reliability, and presenting competitive solutions are fundamental aspects of its growth plan.

Mobile Revenue Increases Due to ARPU and Device Sales

The mobile division of Optus has emerged as the leading performer, with a 4.4% overall increase in mobile revenue. This includes a 4.1% rise in mobile service revenue and a 5.2% growth in mobile device sales, attributed to heightened demand for high-end smartphones. The blended Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) improved by 2.4%, signaling greater customer involvement and a move towards higher-value plans.

Performance in the Second Half

During the latter half of FY2025, mobile revenue increased by 4.2%, while EBITDA and EBIT rose by 4% and 52%, respectively. These enhancements were propelled by cost management, lower amortization, and sustained interest in mobile offerings.

Home Internet Segment Achieves Modest Progress

Optus’s home segment recorded a 3.9% revenue increase, bolstered by growth across both NBN and Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) services. NBN revenue grew by 3.5%, while FWA expanded by 9.1%, driven by higher ARPU and escalating demand for swift, adaptable home connectivity—especially in rural locales.

Strategic Alliances Stimulate Growth

Strategic partnerships and acquisitions have enabled Optus to widen its reach and service portfolio. The Multi-Operator Core Network (MOCN) agreement with TPG Telecom is expediting 5G rollout, particularly in less populated areas of Australia. This collaboration permits both companies to share mobile infrastructure, enhancing service quality and coverage.

Additionally, a renewed five-year wholesale mobile contract with Aussie Broadband extends Optus’s access to new customer demographics. Amaysim, which continues to drive growth for Optus, not only introduced NBN services over the past year but also acquired Circles.Life Australia’s customer base in February 2025—widening its share in the economical mobile sector.

Conclusion

Optus is evidently on a positive trajectory. With significant growth in mobile subscriptions, strengthened financial performance, and a strategic focus on partnerships and product differentiation, the telecom provider is confidently making a comeback. Although challenges persist—especially in rebuilding trust following previous troubles—Optus’s outlook appears promising, well-positioning it against competitors like Telstra and Vodafone within the Australian telecommunications market.

Q: What were the key factors behind Optus’s strong financial performance in FY2025?

A:

Optus’s financial outcomes were primarily influenced by advancements in its mobile sector, including a 4.1% rise in service revenue and higher ARPU. Effective cost management, enhanced customer retention, and the sale of premium devices also led to a 55% increase in EBIT.

Q: How many new clients did Optus acquire?

A:

Optus achieved an addition of 238,000 new mobile customers during the fiscal year ending 31 March 2025, including 52,000 new postpaid clients along with substantial growth from its prepaid brand, amaysim.

Q: What contribution did amaysim have in Optus’s resurgence?

A:

Amaysim played a crucial role in Optus’s customer expansion by providing cost-effective prepaid mobile services. It also launched NBN solutions and acquired Circles.Life Australia, thus further increasing its market footprint.

Q: What strategic partnerships has Optus formed recently?

A:

Optus has established a partnership with TPG Telecom via the MOCN agreement to fast-track 5G implementation in regional areas. A new five-year wholesale mobile alliance with Aussie Broadband has also been secured.

Q: How is Optus performing in the home internet sector?

A:

Home internet revenue increased by 3.9% compared to the previous year, driven by heightened adoption of NBN and Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) services. Increased ARPU in these areas contributed to the revenue boosts.

Q: What does MOCN mean, and how does it serve customers?

A:

MOCN, or Multi-Operator Core Network, enables Optus and TPG Telecom to share mobile network infrastructure. This arrangement enhances coverage and service dependability, particularly in underserved or rural regions.

Q: What measures is Optus implementing to rebuild customer trust?

A:

Optus is concentrating on enhancing customer experience, boosting service reliability, and providing increased value through competitive pricing and adaptable plans. CEO Stephen Rue has stressed the necessity of transparency and a focus on customer-centric transformation.

Q: Where can I find more information about Optus’s latest offerings?

A:

You can visit their official website at optus.com.au for the most recent updates regarding mobile, broadband, and business solutions.

Macquarie BFS Prepares Employees to Integrate AI Agents into Everyday Activities


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Macquarie BFS Gears Up Workforce for AI Agent Implementation

Quick Overview

  • Macquarie BFS is equipping its employees for the widespread integration of AI agents throughout the company.
  • Five to six AI agent proof-of-concept projects are currently in progress to enhance productivity.
  • Training in prompt engineering has been initiated to facilitate AI integration among staff.
  • Slack acts as the “digital headquarters” for communication and automation within BFS.
  • Collaborations with Jira, Atlassian, Microsoft, and Salesforce are reshaping workflows.
  • BFS is prioritizing high-value AI applications and strategic technology alliances.
  • Company-wide AI initiatives, such as AI-enhanced search, are actively being explored.
Macquarie BFS equips its teams to engage with AI agents

(L-R) Stephanie Hoople, head of customer success ANZ/ASEAN at Slack and Shaun Kamler, head of control tower, banking and financial services group at Macquarie Group

Adopting Agentic AI: Macquarie BFS’s Upcoming Productivity Challenge

Macquarie Banking and Financial Services (BFS) is embracing a proactive strategy for AI transformation, effectively preparing its workforce to engage with AI agents. These self-sufficient digital assistants are being tested across BFS operations with the aim of minimizing administrative duties while unlocking greater productivity.

As stated by Shaun Kamler, head of the control tower at BFS, the organization already has five to six AI agent proof-of-concept (POC) initiatives underway. These agents aim to automate repetitive tasks, allowing employees to dedicate their efforts to more strategic and valuable activities.

“We believe this will unlock the next level of productivity,” Kamler remarked at a recent financial services summit organized by Agentforce. “Teams will need to modify how they operate and communicate to maximize AI effectiveness.”

Training for the AI Age: Prompt Engineering on a Larger Scale

To prepare its workforce for this new age, BFS has introduced prompt engineering training—an essential capability for interacting with generative AI systems. This training aids staff in effectively structuring queries and inputs so that AI agents can understand and execute them properly.

Kamler highlighted the significance of rendering AI outputs “agent-ready,” cautioning that inadequately structured content dispersed across platforms like Confluence could result in AI misinterpretations or errors. “We’re aiming to democratize this capability throughout the organization,” he added.

Slack: The Central Hub Revolutionizing Workflows

Slack has become a crucial component of BFS’s digital strategy, functioning as a central hub for communication, incident management, and automated workflows. Kamler characterized Slack as the “digital headquarters” where employees can retrieve vital information and smoothly transition to action across integrated platforms.

For instance, BFS has established a public Slack channel for incident management, permitting anyone in the organization to track and respond to system issues in real time. Integrations with Atlassian’s Jira and Microsoft tools further empower teams to operate more effectively across various platforms.

However, not all integrations have been successful—an initiative to manage leave approvals via Slack did not resonate, leading BFS to concentrate exclusively on high-impact automations. Nonetheless, the platform continues to serve as a key testing ground for AI agents, including one that checks code compliance with cybersecurity protocols.

Organization-Wide AI Integration and Strategic Collaborations

In addition to internal applications, BFS is investigating enterprise-wide AI functionalities, such as intelligent search systems that utilize both structured and unstructured data. This endeavor aims to dismantle data silos and expedite decision-making across the organization.

Kamler pointed out that BFS prefers to collaborate with a limited number of strategic technology partners who are amenable to collaboration and co-development. These include Salesforce (Service Cloud, Sales Cloud) and Slack, among others.

By focusing its partner relationships, BFS ensures deeper integration and improved alignment between technological solutions and business objectives—a strategy that fosters scalable AI deployment with tangible results.

Conclusion

Macquarie BFS is establishing a foundation for a revolutionary transition towards AI-driven operations. Through staff training, AI agent experimentation, leveraging Slack for workflow automation, and cultivating strategic technology partnerships, BFS is positioning itself at the cutting edge of financial services innovation in Australia. This forward-looking strategy is set to enhance both employee productivity and organizational flexibility as AI becomes an integral aspect of daily operations.

Q: What is agentic AI, and how is Macquarie BFS utilizing it?

A:

Agentic AI pertains to AI systems that can operate independently to accomplish tasks or make decisions. Macquarie BFS is currently executing several proofs-of-concept to investigate how these agents can automate administrative responsibilities and boost productivity across the organization.

Q: How is BFS preparing its employees for AI incorporation?

A:

BFS has rolled out prompt engineering training to enable staff to communicate effectively with AI agents. Teams are also encouraged to create structured, AI-friendly content to minimize confusion and enhance the quality of AI outcomes.

Q: What role does Slack play in BFS’s AI approach?

A:

Slack functions as a primary collaboration center or “digital headquarters” at BFS. It integrates with other tools such as Jira and Microsoft systems, facilitates incident responses, and acts as a platform for deploying AI agents that assist with cybersecurity and workflow management tasks.

Q: Has BFS encountered any difficulties with AI or technology integrations?

A:

Indeed, not every integration has been successful. For instance, a Slack-based leave approval system did not resonate well with employees, prompting BFS to concentrate only on features that add substantial value to workflows.

Q: What enterprise AI projects is BFS investigating?

A:

BFS is exploring enterprise search tools powered by AI to utilize both structured and unstructured data more effectively, enhancing internal knowledge discovery and response times.

Q: Who are BFS’s principal technology collaborators in this transformation?

A:

BFS works with a select group of partners, including Slack, Salesforce (Service Cloud, Sales Cloud), Atlassian, and Microsoft. These collaborations focus on co-developing AI solutions that meet BFS’s unique needs.

Q: How does BFS evaluate the success of its AI projects?

A:

Success is assessed through enhancements in productivity, reduction of manual tasks, employee engagement, and the influence of AI integrations on business agility and operational efficiency.

BHP Undertakes Bold AI Transformation Across Whole Organization


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

BHP Unveils Enterprise-Wide AI and Data Mastery Strategy | TechBest

Quick Overview

  • BHP is initiating an ambitious AI innovation strategy across its global frontiers.
  • New leadership roles—AI Mastery and Data Mastery Practice Leads—have been established to drive the project.
  • The objective is to enhance AI capabilities throughout exploration, production, and operational performance.
  • CEO Mike Henry asserts that AI’s full potential in mining remains unexplored and revolutionary.
  • Applications for these positions are accepted until May 25, with flexible locations including Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, and Santiago.
BHP embarks on large-scale artificial intelligence initiative

AI and Data Mastery: BHP’s New Digital Frontier

Mining leader BHP is launching a transformative digital strategy, revealing the establishment of two senior positions concentrated on embedding artificial intelligence (AI) and data sophistication across its global operations. These new roles—Practice Lead for AI Mastery and Practice Lead for Data Mastery—are crucial for fulfilling BHP’s ambition for inclusive AI implementation across the enterprise.

The positions will take charge of the assimilation, management, and ethical expansion of AI technologies within BHP’s framework. These practice leads will set the standard for technical excellence in their domains, ensuring AI models are efficient, scalable, and compliant with governance practices and ethical considerations.

Strategic Emphasis: Transitioning from Pilot Programs to Comprehensive AI Embedding

Historically, BHP has leveraged AI and machine learning in limited ways, notably in mineral exploration and ore recovery. In partnership with Microsoft Azure, BHP has previously utilized AI to enhance copper extraction at their Escondida mine in Chile. These initial strides have paved the way for a broader strategy aimed at integrating AI into every aspect of the operation—from supply chain enhancement to predictive maintenance for equipment.

As per BHP’s job postings, the AI Mastery Lead will play a key role in “establishing technical excellence for the advancement of BHP’s AI capabilities,” which encompass model optimization and extensive deployment. Conversely, the Data Mastery Lead will ensure the integrity, scalability, and security of BHP’s global data frameworks, focusing on AI utility and cost-effectiveness.

Leadership and Global Scope: A Worldwide Presence

The practice leads will report to Johan van Jaarsveld, Chief Technical Officer, and Thomas Leen, Group Technology Officer—both stationed in Melbourne. The positions are open to applicants from major mining centers such as Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, and Santiago, with possible flexibility for various locations. This international outlook showcases BHP’s global operations and dedication to large-scale digital transformation.

CEO’s Perspective: AI as a Driver for Unanticipated Outcomes

BHP CEO Mike Henry has conveyed significant excitement about AI’s possibilities, indicating that the technology can reveal solutions and efficiencies that are yet to be envisioned. At a recent industry conference in the United States, Henry commented, “In the case of AI, we can recognize what’s directly ahead of us… but five years from now, we’ll be uncovering opportunities we can’t even foresee today.”

He highlighted instances where AI has already surpassed human analysts in discovering mineral deposits and enhancing infrastructure efficiency. According to Henry, these milestones are merely the start of a much broader digital transformation within the mining industry.

Industry Landscape: Mining’s Digital Transition

BHP’s AI endeavor arrives at a juncture where the mining sector increasingly embraces digital solutions to enhance safety, sustainability, and profitability. Deloitte’s 2024 Mining and Metals Report notes that companies integrating AI and data analytics into their operations have recorded substantial advancements in productivity and cost management.

From autonomous hauling systems and AI-driven exploration to real-time environmental monitoring, digital innovation is quickly becoming a key differentiator. BHP’s recent initiative emphasizes its aim to lead in this transformation.

Application Schedule: May 25 Cutoff

BHP is currently welcoming applications for both practice lead roles through its careers platform until May 25. Ideal applicants will have extensive experience in AI engineering, data science, systems integration, and digital governance, along with a solid record of strategic leadership.

Conclusion

BHP is reinforcing its commitment to artificial intelligence with a top-down strategy that introduces new leadership roles to navigate the miner’s AI and data transformation. With aspirations to broaden AI capabilities across its operations and a belief in the unexplored transformative power of the technology, BHP is establishing a new benchmark for digital advancement in the resource industry. As the company invests in talent and infrastructure, the future of mining may become remarkably more intelligent, efficient, and sustainable.

Q: What is the aim of BHP’s AI transformation strategy?

A:

BHP’s AI strategy is intended to embed artificial intelligence into all areas of its operations, from exploration and production to logistics and maintenance. The objective is to enhance efficiency, minimize costs, and reveal new opportunities through data-informed decision-making.

Q: What positions has BHP introduced to support this strategy?

A:

BHP has established two new senior roles: Practice Lead for AI Mastery and Practice Lead for Data Mastery. These positions will set and implement best practices in AI model development, data governance, system integration, and ethical AI application.

Q: Where are these new positions located?

A:

The roles are intended to be situated in Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, or Santiago, though BHP offers flexibility in location based on the qualifications of the candidate.

Q: How has BHP previously utilized AI?

A:

In the past, BHP has employed AI to assist with mineral exploration and enhance ore recovery. For instance, it collaborated with Microsoft to improve copper extraction efficiency via AI applications.

Q: What qualifications are needed for the new positions?

A:

A strong background in AI engineering, data science, or systems architecture is required for candidates, along with demonstrated leadership skills in scaling enterprise-level technological solutions.

Q: What is the application deadline?

A:

Applications for both roles will be accepted until May 25 and can be submitted through BHP’s career site.

Q: How does this strategy position BHP in the mining sector?

A:

This initiative positions BHP at the leading edge of digital innovation in mining. By integrating AI and data mastery into its core operations, the company is setting a standard for technological leadership and future-ready mining practices.

Tesla’s Optimus Robot Abandons Dance Moves, Displays Remarkable New Abilities in Recent Video


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Tesla Optimus Robot Demonstrates Household Skills in New Video

Brief Overview

  • Tesla’s Optimus humanoid robot is now demonstrating practical uses beyond just performing dance routines.
  • A recently released video shows Optimus engaging in tasks such as vacuuming, disposing of trash, and washing dishes.
  • The robot acquires new skills through natural language instructions, highlighting its AI integration and flexibility.
  • Improvements in dexterity suggest it could be used in both factory and home environments.
  • Current speed enhancements are in progress, with the video footage accelerated by 1.5x to 2x.
  • Upcoming updates are anticipated to enable better contextual understanding and more autonomous task capabilities.

Optimus Enters Practical Application

Previously, Tesla’s videos of Optimus focused on its expressive movements through choreographed dances, but the latest exhibit showcases a new direction. In a fresh video release, Tesla’s humanoid robot executes various practical functions, providing insights into its potential uses in industrial and domestic settings.

Optimus is now shown disposing of waste, vacuuming floors, and even taking part in manufacturing-line tasks. These presentations mark a significant milestone in Tesla’s robotics initiative, moving from entertainment toward real-life functionality.

Acquiring Skills via Natural Language

A key highlight from the video is Tesla’s utilization of natural language commands. A caption accompanying the footage states: “Optimus is acquiring several new tasks, guided by natural language.” This indicates that the robot can learn new functions without complex programming or coding expertise.

For example, when instructed to “grab the trash bag, lift the lid, and place the bag in the bin”, Optimus competently completes the task sequentially. Although the current instructions are somewhat literal, future versions of the robot are expected to automatically understand basic contextual actions, such as lifting a bin lid when discarding waste.

Robotics in Everyday Life

Alongside industrial functionalities, Tesla also showcased Optimus managing everyday household responsibilities. Commands like “pick up the spoon and stir the pot” demonstrate the robot’s precise motor skills and awareness of its surroundings. As the AI evolves, commands are likely to become simpler; for instance, just saying “stir the pot” may suffice, with the robot intuitively selecting the right utensil.

Showcased tasks include ironing garments, tearing off paper towels, washing dishes, and adjusting blinds. These capabilities suggest a future where humanoid robots could assist in daily activities, particularly for individuals facing mobility difficulties or in elder care settings.

Ongoing Development of Hardware and Speed

While the robot’s dexterity is remarkable, Tesla emphasizes that the hardware is still a work in progress. The video fluctuates between 1.5x and 2x speed, hinting that real-time performance is still getting fine-tuned. Nevertheless, the smoothness of movement and variety of actions already displayed indicate that Optimus is on a promising path for practical use.

The current limitations in speed appear to stem more from training and optimization rather than hardware issues. As Tesla continues to refine the system, we can expect future iterations of Optimus to carry out tasks more quickly and fluidly.

The Core of Optimus: AI Integration

Optimus’ capacity to comprehend and perform tasks based on spoken or written directions is driven by Tesla’s proprietary AI systems. It is probable that the same neural networks that underpin Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology are being modified for robotic applications.

This cross-domain AI development strategy enables Tesla to innovate rapidly and transfer enhancements across various sectors. The focus on natural language understanding positions Optimus as an especially user-friendly robot, facilitating broader adoption in both office environments and households.

Conclusion

Tesla’s Optimus robot has made a remarkable advancement, evolving from entertaining dance displays to executing functional duties with clear real-world relevance. With its capability to learn through natural language commands and exhibit notable dexterity, Optimus may soon become a vital element in both homes and workplaces. While hardware and speed are still under refinement, the foundation established in this latest video hints at a bright future for versatile humanoid robotics.

Q: What new abilities can Tesla’s Optimus robot perform?

A:

Optimus is now capable of handling tasks such as trash disposal, floor vacuuming, stirring pots, managing blinds, ironing, tearing paper towels, and washing dishes. These abilities illustrate its expanding usefulness in both workplace and home environments.

Q: How does Optimus acquire new skills?

A:

Optimus learns through natural language commands, allowing users to teach it new tasks with simple verbal or written instructions, thus significantly reducing the barriers to training, making it accessible to those without technical expertise.

Q: Is Optimus ready for commercial use?

A:

Not yet. Although the demonstrations are impressive, the robot remains in development. Tesla is enhancing both the hardware and software to boost speed, autonomy, and contextual comprehension. Commercial availability may still be a couple of years away.

Q: What distinguishes Optimus from other humanoid robots?

A:

Optimus is distinguished by its strong integration with Tesla’s AI technologies, ease of learning through natural language, and its capability to perform a diverse array of tasks. Its progress is underpinned by Tesla’s experience in autonomy and neural network technology.

Q: Will Optimus be beneficial in Australian homes and workplaces?

A:

Definitely. In Australia, where workforce shortages and demands for elder care are increasing, a versatile robot like Optimus could provide essential assistance. Its potential applications span across manufacturing, healthcare, and home environments.

Q: When is Optimus expected to be available to consumers?

A:

Tesla has not specified a release date yet. Based on its current development stage and previous timelines for Tesla products, it’s reasonable to anticipate limited pilot programs within a few years, with broader availability possibly by the decade’s end.

Q: How quickly can Optimus execute tasks?

A:

In the most recent video, the footage was sped up by 1.5x to 2x, suggesting that the current task execution speeds are being optimized. Tesla aims to enhance performance over time through ongoing training and hardware improvements.

Q: What is the long-term vision for Optimus?

A:

Elon Musk envisions Optimus as a multipurpose robot capable of performing any task humans can handle but prefer not to. This includes high-risk, repetitive, and mundane tasks in domestic settings, factories, and even in the realm of space exploration.

Treasury Wine Estates Engages AI Agents to Reveal Enhanced Consumer Insights


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Treasury Wine Estates Utilises AI Agents for Enhanced Consumer Insights | TechBest

Quick Overview

  • Treasury Wine Estates (TWE) incorporates AI agents Aivi and Viti to assess global wine industry information.
  • AI technologies created in collaboration with GPTStrategic to improve trend analysis and foster innovation.
  • AI agents examine over 3,500 industry documents compiled on SharePoint.
  • Aivi concentrates on enhancing insights derived from data, while Viti anticipates future trends and innovations.
  • Utilisation of AI minimizes human bias and hastens decision-making across TWE’s portfolio.
  • Opportunities for extending AI applications into sales and marketing areas within the organization.
  • A component of a larger digital transformation involving robotics and predictive analytics.

Transforming Wine Industry Analysis through AI

Treasury Wine Estates (TWE), one of the globe’s largest wine enterprises, has boldly stepped into the future by implementing two AI agents—Aivi and Viti—to transform the way the company extracts value from worldwide wine consumption information and industry trend analyses. This initiative, crafted in cooperation with GPTStrategic, is designed to streamline and enhance insight generation throughout its expansive array of wine brands.

AI Agents Aivi and Viti Revolutionise Consumer Insight Collection at Treasury Wine Estates

Aivi and Viti: The Digital Minds Behind the Insights

Functions

Aivi and Viti each have unique but complementary functions. Aivi distills and synthesizes thousands of documents—currently over 3,500—into implementable trend insights. Conversely, Viti is structured to look forward, pinpointing future opportunities and innovation pathways within the wine industry.

Origins

Prior to the introduction of AI, TWE’s insights process was largely manual and labor-intensive. According to Angus Lilley, Managing Director of Treasury Premium Brands, the company encountered difficulties in both aggregating extensive volumes of data and in extracting unbiased, timely insights from them. “One of the issues we faced was amalgamating and keeping all the information and reports consolidated,” he stated.

Centralised Data for Intelligent Decisions

To facilitate the AI agents, TWE gathered essential industry documents in a SharePoint repository. This digital advancement established a unified source of truth, allowing Aivi and Viti to query a centralised dataset and deliver rapid, relevant insights that would typically require human analysts days or even weeks to unearth.

Enhancing Efficiency and Minimising Bias

The AI agents have dramatically hastened the insights generation process, reducing manual tasks and eradicating the potential for human bias that can affect data interpretation. Lilley commented, “We’re reaching some of those insights much faster than we used to.”

This increased efficiency enables TWE’s consumer insights team to redirect time and resources toward strategic initiatives within the company, ultimately supporting quicker, more data-informed decision-making across their extensive brand portfolio.

Future Prospects: AI in Sales and Marketing

The achievements of Aivi and Viti have paved the way for broader AI implementations within TWE. Lilley indicated intentions to enhance AI integration into sales and marketing operations, utilising data to optimise campaigns, customise product offerings, and elevate customer interactions.

This aligns with TWE’s overarching digital transformation, which features the utilisation of robotics in vineyard operations and predictive AI for yield forecasting—demonstrating a company deeply committed to innovation throughout all aspects of its operations.

Preparing for a Digital Future

As part of its dedication to digital progress, TWE actively invests in upskilling its workforce to adeptly utilise AI tools like Aivi and Viti. This ongoing endeavour ensures that every team, from operations to marketing, is prepared to harness the power of AI-driven insights.

Lilley underlined the significance of this transformation, stating, “We’re consistently upskilling the organization in employing such tools and we expect that to persist for an extended period.”

Conclusion

Treasury Wine Estates is establishing a new benchmark in the wine sector by integrating AI agents Aivi and Viti to extract deeper consumer insights and anticipate forthcoming trends. By consolidating data and automating analysis, TWE is enhancing operational efficiency and facilitating smarter, quicker decision-making. With ambitions to broaden AI applications in sales and marketing, alongside ongoing investments in employee training, the company is clearly positioning itself as a tech-savvy leader in the global wine industry.

Common Questions

Q: What are Aivi and Viti?

A:

Aivi and Viti are AI-powered digital agents created by Treasury Wine Estates in collaboration with GPTStrategic. Aivi is focused on transforming data into actionable insights, whereas Viti identifies future trends and innovation possibilities.

Q: How do these AI agents access industry data?

A:

The AI agents utilize a centralised SharePoint repository containing over 3,500 industry documents. This guarantees that they operate with a comprehensive, up-to-date dataset for their analyses.

Q: What advantages has TWE gained from employing these AI tools?

A:

TWE has enjoyed quicker insights generation, a decrease in manual efforts, elimination of human bias, and improved decision-making across its wine portfolio. Teams are now able to devote more attention to strategic projects.

Q: Will AI be employed in other areas of the business?

A:

Yes. TWE is considering the implementation of AI in sales and marketing to enhance campaigns, anticipate consumer preferences, and tailor product offerings.

Q: How is TWE preparing its staff for this digital transition?

A:

The company is actively enhancing employee skills in AI tools and digital technologies to ensure smooth adoption and effective use in various departments.

Q: Is this part of a larger digital evolution?

A:

Indeed. TWE’s implementation of AI agents complements its broader digital initiatives encompassing robotics in vineyards, predictive analytics, and autonomous vehicles in operations.

Q: Can other wine producers implement similar technologies?

A:

Definitely. While TWE is at the forefront, the tools and strategies in use can be adapted by other wine producers aiming to modernise their operations and enhance data-driven decision-making.

From Urgent Warnings to Genuine Understanding: The Need to Reevaluate Cyber Risk Reporting in Australia


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Reassessing Cyber Risk Reporting: Transforming Alerts into Genuine Insights | TechBest Australia

Quick Overview: Essential Points

  • Australian entities need to transition from ambiguous cyber risk reports to concrete, measurable insights.
  • Effective communication of cyber risk relies on traceability through operational, executive, and board levels.
  • Obsolete “high risk” classifications are inadequate—cyber risk reporting must demonstrate return on investment.
  • Risk quantification should be made accessible for business leaders, even when implementing sophisticated models like Monte Carlo simulations.
  • The newest NIST CSF 2.0 update includes a governance component, aligning capabilities with risk management objectives.
  • Begin with clear risk definitions and gradually enhance maturity for enduring cyber resilience.
Reinventing cyber risk reporting in Australia for measurable insights

Updating Cyber Risk Reporting in Australia

As cyber threats escalate within Australia’s digital environment, cybersecurity leaders face increasing pressure to validate their security expenditures. With budget constraints tightening, the focus has shifted from “what’s the risk?” to “what’s the return?”

Jason Ha, a cyber security risk expert and CISO at Ethan, is advocating for Australian organizations to rethink their strategies for cyber risk reporting. Ahead of AusCERT 2025, Ha promotes a transition from generic dashboards to traceable, data-driven models that align cyber investments with measurable results.

Linking Cyber Investments to Risk Mitigation

Traceability Across Levels

A core message from Ha is the necessity of traceability in cyber risk reporting. “You must be able to articulate, ‘Here are our top 10 risks, we’re prioritizing the reduction of the top three, and we anticipate a decrease of X dollars in risk,’” he clarifies.

This framework helps organizations close the communication gap between operational teams, executives, and board members. Instead of a disconnected series of activities, traceability fosters a cohesive narrative—vital when boards expect evidence of returns on cyber investments.

The Maturity Gap in Cyber Risk Management

Ha asserts that numerous organizations adhere to outdated risk frameworks poorly suited to the fluid nature of cyber threats. “Cyber risks are adversarial and continuously transforming,” he states. “Conventional models liken them to natural disasters—predictable and unchanging.”

To tackle this issue, organizations require additional methodologies that facilitate detailed, cause-and-effect evaluations. Such models must integrate with current risk frameworks, offering real-time awareness of threat mitigation initiatives.

Simplifying Risk Measurement for Business Executives

While academic frameworks like Monte Carlo simulations or FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) provide accuracy, they often prove too intricate for effective implementation within many Australian businesses. Ha cautions that leaders may alienate their audiences if models are not user-friendly.

“You don’t have to achieve statistical precision on day one,” he remarks. “What’s essential is establishing a structured, transparent approach that allows you to begin your journey—and improve over time.”

Starting with Clear Risk Definitions

Before engaging in quantification, Ha emphasizes the importance of refining risk definitions. “You can’t tackle an issue if you’re unclear on what you’re addressing,” he says. Clearly structured risk statements lay the groundwork for developing a strong and defensible cyber risk model.

Connecting the Communication Gap

Many cybersecurity teams find it challenging to articulate their efforts in ways that resonate with senior stakeholders. Ha underscores the necessity of traceability as the connective tissue that links tactical actions with strategic outcomes.

For instance, while the implementation of endpoint detection tools is crucial, it’s even more impactful when you can demonstrate, “This reduces a top-three risk by 25%.” Such clarity dismantles barriers between technical and executive roles.

Frameworks: Instruments, Not Objectives

Ha contends that frameworks such as NIST CSF, ISO 27001, and Australia’s Essential Eight offer structure, but they serve as tools—not ultimate goals. “These frameworks assist in mapping capabilities, but your controls must be informed by your risk profile and not merely compliance checklists.”

He points out the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0’s newly introduced governance pillar as a significant advancement. It advocates for decisions to be made through a risk perspective before selecting technologies and controls.

Transforming the Cyber Risk Dialogue

Effective cyber risk reporting transcends numerical data—it embodies transparency. Ha suggests laying out assumptions, involving stakeholders at every tier, and leveraging industry data to substantiate your conclusions.

“The traditional approach of creating a risk matrix and estimating ‘high likelihood, high impact’ is obsolete,” he asserts. “Boards demand defensible decisions rooted in concrete data.”

Cyber Self-Defence: A Practical Beginning

Ha compares the path toward cyber maturity to mastering self-defence. “You don’t need to become an expert to avoid harm. Just grasp the fundamentals and grow from there.”

He outlines five essential steps any organization can undertake:

  1. Assess the risk: Gather information on likelihood and impact—often, business units can gauge the impact more accurately than IT departments.
  2. Involve business owners: Those most familiar with the process often bear the actual risk.
  3. Identify controls and traceability: Connect risk mitigation efforts to specific actions and tools.
  4. Communicate across layers: Adjust your messaging for boards, executives, and operational teams.
  5. Begin simply: Utilize existing resources, then enhance over time.

Conclusion

Australia’s cyber threat environment is becoming increasingly intricate, and boards are insisting on clearer justification for cybersecurity expenditures. Transitioning from ambiguous, colour-coded risk matrices to organized, data-informed reporting facilitates improved decisions, greater transparency, and ultimately, enhanced cyber resilience. Jason Ha’s message is unambiguous: modernize your cyber risk reporting or risk falling behind.

Q&A: Addressing Your Cyber Risk Reporting Inquiries

Q: Why are traditional cyber risk reporting methods losing effectiveness?

A:

Traditional approaches frequently depend on subjective risk matrices and lack traceability. They fail to establish a clear connection between investments and outcomes, which is essential in today’s budget-sensitive climate.

Q: What does “traceability” signify regarding cyber risk?

A:

Traceability denotes the capability to directly correlate specific cybersecurity investments to risk mitigation outcomes across all organizational tiers—from the boardroom to operational levels.

Q: How can organizations initiate cyber risk quantification?

A:

Start with well-defined risk assessments and baseline estimates. Even a broad range (e.g., $10M to $15M) is more beneficial than vague labels. Over time, refine estimates using improved data.

Q: Are frameworks like NIST and ISO 27001 still relevant?

A:

Absolutely, but they should assist—rather than replace—risk-centered decision-making. Utilize them to organize your controls while ensuring alignment with your organization’s specific risk profile.

Q: What’s the first step towards enhancing cyber risk reporting?

A:

Commence by rewriting your risk statements with clarity.

Aussie SMEs Under Threat as Ransomware Attacks Spike


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Australian SMEs Face Increased Cyber Threats as Ransomware Incidents Climb | TechBest

Brief Overview

  • Ransomware incidents in Australia increased by 5% in the latter half of 2024.
  • Australian SMEs are now some of the key targets for cybercriminals.
  • Phishing incidents have jumped by 197% compared to late 2023.
  • Cyber threats are now increasingly sent through SMS, WhatsApp, and social networks.
  • AI and ransomware-as-a-service are facilitating more accessible and larger-scale attacks.
  • Cybersecurity training is crucial for SMEs to combat social engineering threats.

Ransomware Rise Endangers Aussie SMEs

Cybercriminals are pivoting their attention from major corporations to smaller, less-secured businesses as ransomware incidents continue to surge in Australia. The most recent Acronis Cyberthreats Report outlines a 5% rise in ransomware occurrences worldwide in the second half of 2024, positioning Australia among the top 10 targeted nations.

Although financial damages per case have slightly decreased, the increasing rate of attacks and the focus on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) raises alarm. With phishing attempts nearly tripling—up 197% from the same timeframe in 2023—and the average number of attacks per organisation climbing by 21%, SMEs are now at the forefront of the cyber security struggle.

Cyber criminals focus on Australian SMEs as ransomware threats increase

Why SMEs Are Appealing Targets

As larger firms invest in advanced cybersecurity systems, cyber attackers are capitalizing on the weaknesses of SMEs. Gerald Beuchelt, Chief Information Security Officer at Acronis, indicates that many small businesses mistakenly assume that built-in safeguards from platforms such as Microsoft 365 provide complete protection. This unwarranted sense of security makes them vulnerable to ransomware and malware threats.

Cybercriminals are increasingly utilizing AI-based tools and ransomware-as-a-service platforms to execute cost-effective, automated attacks on mid-sized enterprises. While the payoff may be smaller per attack, the sheer volume and simplicity of execution make SMEs a lucrative target.

“Even if the business is small, there’s consistently some form of data to steal or blackmail,” Beuchelt remarks. In some cases, attackers have even targeted the families of executives to gain leverage over larger companies.

Criminal Collaboration: The Emergence of Ransomware-as-a-Service

Ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) has transformed cybercrime by easing the entry threshold for attackers. These services enable criminals to lease ready-made ransomware tools and execute them without requiring extensive technical expertise. This model has established a scalable, user-friendly environment where attackers can target numerous, if not thousands, of SMEs with minimal effort.

The commoditization of cybercrime means even novice attackers can cause considerable harm, particularly when organizations lack sufficient cybersecurity training and frameworks.

Shadow IT and Emerging Attack Channels

While traditional email phishing remains a favored tactic, attackers are broadening their horizons into alternative communication platforms such as SMS, WhatsApp, and social media. These Shadow IT systems elude formal corporate oversight, rendering them more challenging to monitor and secure.

AI-generated spear phishing messages are becoming increasingly convincing and difficult to detect, especially when transmitted through less-regulated channels. Beuchelt advises that businesses should not only control unauthorized tools but also provide secure alternatives that fulfill employee communication needs.

Human Error: The Weakest Link and Last Line of Defence

Technology alone cannot thwart a cyberattack. Human awareness and behavior are essential elements of any robust defense plan. Cybersecurity training must be compulsory for all staff, including onboarding for new employees. Personnel need to be trained to approach all communications—especially those requesting sensitive information or actions—with a critical mindset.

“People are absolutely at the heart of cybersecurity,” Beuchelt emphasizes. “They often represent the weakest link, but with appropriate training, they can turn into a strong line of defense.”

Conclusion

Ransomware incidents are on the rise, placing Australian SMEs squarely in the sights of cybercriminals. These enterprises must not underestimate their significance to hackers or overestimate their existing defenses. The growth of ransomware-as-a-service, AI-enabled phishing, and the misuse of alternative communication methods makes it imperative for SMEs to adopt a holistic cybersecurity strategy that encompasses both technical solutions and staff training.

Q: Why are SMEs increasingly targeted by ransomware attacks?

A:

SMEs often possess weaker cybersecurity measures and might not consider themselves probable targets. This makes them appealing to attackers utilizing scalable tools like ransomware-as-a-service. They are also more inclined to pay smaller ransoms to quickly regain access to their systems.

Q: What is ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS)?

A:

RaaS is a business framework where cybercriminals lease ransomware tools to others. This enables even individuals with minimal technical know-how to conduct sophisticated attacks. It significantly reduces the entry threshold for cybercrime and heightens the potential scale of threats.

Q: How are cyber attackers employing AI in phishing campaigns?

A:

Attackers are using AI to create highly customized and believable phishing messages. These messages are frequently indistinguishable from legitimate communications, particularly when sent through less-secured channels such as social media or SMS.

Q: What role does Shadow IT play in cyber threats?

A:

Shadow IT pertains to the use of unauthorized applications, platforms, or devices within an organization. These tools often lack centralized security measures, making them prone to exploitation. Attackers increasingly leverage them to circumvent traditional security frameworks.

Q: How can SMEs protect themselves against these threats?

A:

SMEs need to implement a multi-faceted cybersecurity approach. This includes investing in robust security technologies, providing ongoing training for employees, overseeing Shadow IT, and creating incident response plans to swiftly contain and recover from attacks.

Q: Why is employee training so critical in cybersecurity?

A:

Many cyberattacks initiate due to human error, such as clicking on a malicious link. Training staff to recognize suspicious activities and respond correctly can prevent attacks from succeeding and minimize their impact if they do occur.

Q: Are built-in security features in software suites like Microsoft 365 sufficient?

A:

No. Although these features provide a fundamental level of protection, they are not comprehensive. Businesses should enhance them with dedicated cybersecurity solutions and services tailored to their unique risks and requirements.

Q: Is it possible to eradicate cyber threats completely?

A:

TPG Telecom Revamps Organization to Integrate Cloud and Cybersecurity Services


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Quick Read

  • TPG Telecom combines its cloud and cybersecurity teams into a new unit known as: Technology Security, Cloud & End to End Architecture.
  • After the reorganization, General Manager of Technology Security, Lee Barney, will be leaving the company.
  • This restructure is designed to enhance secure-by-design practices and promote the adoption of cloud security throughout the organization.
  • This new unit is in line with the Australian Government’s cybersecurity strategy for essential infrastructure.
  • The Cyber Centre of Excellence (CCoE) located in Sydney will maintain its collaborative efforts with industry and academic institutions.

TPG Telecom Restructures to Integrate Cloud and Cybersecurity Services

TPG Telecom restructure combines cybersecurity and cloud services

Lee Barney.

Leadership Change and Departure of Lee Barney

TPG Telecom has implemented a major organizational overhaul, merging its cloud infrastructure with its cybersecurity functions into a single entity named Technology Security, Cloud & End to End Architecture. This shift resulted in the exit of Lee Barney, who has been TPG’s General Manager of Technology Security for almost three years.

Barney announced his departure on LinkedIn, saying, “As the organization reshapes its leadership focus, I depart with the assurance that the team is well-equipped for the upcoming challenges.” Although TPG Telecom has yet to appoint a leader for the new unit, there are currently no plans in place to find a direct successor.

Strategic Consolidation of Cloud and Security Teams

The merger of TPG’s cloud and security teams is driven by the imperative to cultivate secure-by-design principles, a strategy strongly advocated by the Australian Government’s cybersecurity policies. By integrating these divisions, TPG seeks to enhance coherence between development and security, guaranteeing that new platforms and services are secure from the outset.

A representative from TPG Telecom informed TechBest, “We are uniting security and cloud to design and construct security-native cloud solutions and enhance security capability adoption throughout the organization.”

Alignment with the National Cybersecurity Agenda

This integration aligns closely with the government’s Cyber Security Strategy 2023–2030, which urges organizations in critical infrastructure sectors, such as telecommunications, to adopt layered defensive strategies and secure-by-design methodologies.

This strategy features initiatives such as six “Cyber Shields” aimed at safeguarding Australia’s digital infrastructure, emphasizing collaboration between the public and private sectors, making TPG’s strategic move both timely and well-executed.

The Function of the Cyber Centre of Excellence (CCoE)

During Barney’s stewardship, TPG’s Cyber Centre of Excellence (CCoE) was launched in Sydney and began operations in late 2023. The CCoE aims to identify and address vulnerabilities in telecommunication and IT systems through both offensive and defensive cybersecurity methods.

This facility hosts TPG’s red and blue cybersecurity teams and includes representatives from industry leaders like Ericsson, Nokia, and Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) on rotating 90-day assignments. In collaboration with the University of New South Wales (UNSW), the center also promotes academic partnerships focused on threat research and innovation.

TPG’s Forward-Looking Cybersecurity Strategy

Even though Barney’s departure signifies a pivotal moment, TPG Telecom’s commitment to cybersecurity continues to strengthen. The amalgamation of cloud and security functions is anticipated to enhance workflows, diminish silos, and bolster resilience against new threats. The future of this unit will likely place greater emphasis on automation, AI-driven threat detection, and comprehensive cloud-native security solutions.

Summary

TPG Telecom has redesigned its technology division to merge cloud and cybersecurity services into a unified, cohesive unit. This strategic initiative follows the exit of General Manager Lee Barney and mirrors wider trends in Australia’s critical infrastructure sectors towards adopting secure-by-design methodologies. With its Cyber Centre of Excellence and alignment with national cybersecurity objectives, TPG Telecom is positioning itself as a more agile and security-focused telecommunications provider in an increasingly complex digital environment.

Q: Why did TPG Telecom restructure its technology division?

A:

The restructure is meant to integrate cloud and cybersecurity teams to develop security-native solutions and enhance security adoption throughout the organization, in line with Australia’s secure-by-design strategy.

Q: What is the name of the new function?

A:

The newly formed organizational unit is referred to as Technology Security, Cloud & End to End Architecture.

Q: Who is in charge of the new function?

A:

Currently, TPG Telecom has not appointed a leader for the new function and has no immediate plans to replace Lee Barney.

Q: What impact did Lee Barney have on TPG Telecom?

A:

Barney was instrumental in establishing the Cyber Centre of Excellence, strengthening TPG’s overall security posture, and enhancing in-house cybersecurity capabilities during his time.

Q: What is the Cyber Centre of Excellence (CCoE)?

A:

Situated in Sydney, the CCoE is a facility focused on detecting vulnerabilities within telecom and IT systems. It hosts both red and blue teams, industry collaborators, and academic researchers working together to enhance cybersecurity outcomes.

Q: How does this restructuring connect with national policy?

A:

This restructure aligns with the Australian Government’s cybersecurity strategy, which promotes secure-by-design development and facilitates cooperation between public institutions and private enterprises.

Q: What are red and blue teams in cybersecurity?

A:

Red teams simulate actual cyberattacks to evaluate security systems, while blue teams protect against these threats to reinforce the organization’s defenses. Together, they elevate the security maturity of an organization.

Q: Will customers experience any changes due to this transition?

A:

No significant disruptions to customer services are anticipated. In the long run, customers may enjoy enhanced security and reliability in cloud-based offerings resulting from this integration.

Vodafone Raises Concerns About Telstra with ACCC Regarding Mobile Coverage Conflict


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Swift Overview

  • Vodafone has lodged a complaint against Telstra with the ACCC, accusing the latter of potentially deceptive mobile coverage assertions.
  • Reports indicate that Telstra’s coverage relies on external antennas typically not used by the general public.
  • Vodafone suggests that recent updates to Telstra’s website indicate a prior lack of clarity in representation.
  • The ACCC is contemplating a regulatory inquiry; Vodafone is considering legal action as well.
  • ACCAN is advocating for a formal investigation, citing significant consequences for consumers in regional areas.
  • The conflict arises from enduring disputes surrounding regional roaming and access to networks.
Vodafone refers Telstra to ACCC over misleading mobile coverage claims

Vodafone Targets Telstra’s Coverage Statements

Vodafone, a part of TPG Telecom, has officially submitted a grievance to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), claiming that Telstra has misled consumers regarding its mobile coverage assertions. The telecommunications company is also contemplating legal measures, emphasizing that Telstra’s touted network range relies on equipment that is generally not utilized by ordinary mobile users.

The Core of the Issue: Coverage vs. Reality

The central issue in this debate is the methodology for measuring mobile coverage. Vodafone argues that Telstra’s 3 million square kilometre coverage assertion depends on the availability of “external antennas and powered repeaters”—devices often situated on buildings or vehicles, as opposed to being carried by consumers.

This claim is corroborated by the ACCC’s 2024 Mobile Infrastructure Report, highlighting how coverage claims can be inflated with the use of signal-enhancing technology. Vodafone argues that Telstra’s public maps and promotional content didn’t initially clarify this distinction.

Telstra’s Take: Rejection and Rationale

Telstra has acknowledged that it utilizes external antennas in its coverage assessments but refutes any intention to mislead. A Telstra representative stated, “Customers in regional and remote locations benefit from utilizing external antennas… our maps allow users to view coverage with and without these devices.”

Telstra asserts that it has consistently been transparent through its online resources, claiming that the recent enhancements to its website were aimed at better informing the public post-discussion with Vodafone—not an admission of misleading behavior.

Vodafone Calls for Action

Vodafone asserts that its ongoing appeals for Telstra to rectify or clarify the contested coverage claims were disregarded until recent modifications were made on Telstra’s site. Vodafone contends that these alterations are a tacit acknowledgment that the previous assertions were misleading.

Regardless, Vodafone insists that Telstra’s updates fail to resolve the issue adequately and has formally requested the ACCC to investigate. Legal routes are also being contemplated to compel Telstra to terminate its practices and possibly offer compensation.

Wider Industry Ramifications and MVNO Concerns

Vodafone emphasizes that mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) utilizing Telstra’s infrastructure may have gained advantages from the purportedly exaggerated claims, implying that the matter transcends the two primary telecoms, affecting the broader industry.

Access to Telstra’s regional infrastructure has long been contentious. Vodafone previously sought roaming privileges via the ACCC, which were denied in 2022. A subsequent network-sharing agreement between TPG Telecom and Telstra was also turned down by the Competition Tribunal due to potential anti-competitive effects. Following these setbacks, TPG has allied with Optus for a regional network collaboration.

ACCAN Urges ACCC to Intervene

The Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN) has lent its support to Vodafone’s appeal for regulatory action. CEO Carol Bennett termed the allegation that Telstra has exaggerated its network coverage for over a decade as “grave and harmful.”

“Many Australians in remote locales depend on Telstra under the assumption that it’s the sole provider with dependable service,” she remarked. “If the coverage benefits have been overstated, then consumers are being misled into paying higher prices for potentially illusory advantages.”

ACCAN is urging the ACCC to take decisive measures if the allegations hold true, asserting that “misleading and deceptive practices are unacceptable in any market, particularly one dealing with essential services.”

Conclusion

Vodafone has placed Telstra under scrutiny, accusing its competitor of misleading Australians—especially those in rural and remote areas—by inflating its mobile coverage claims. The debate revolves around whether Telstra’s network assertions accurately reflect actual device functionality or depend on specialized signal-enhancing equipment. With the ACCC now contemplating an inquiry and ACCAN backing the initiative, the eventual outcome could significantly impact mobile competition and consumer confidence throughout Australia.

Q: What is the main issue between Vodafone and Telstra?

A:

Vodafone contends that Telstra misrepresented its mobile coverage by encompassing areas only accessible via external antennas, which are not normally utilized by regular mobile users. This, they claim, misleads individuals about the practical usability of Telstra’s network.

Q: Has Telstra responded to the accusations?

A:

Yes. Telstra refutes any accusations of misconduct and argues that its maps and marketing materials have consistently enabled users to view coverage with and without the use of external antennas. It states that the recent adjustments to its website were made to clarify this distinction further after discussions with Vodafone.

Q: What action is Vodafone pursuing?

A:

Vodafone is advocating for a regulatory inquiry by the ACCC and is exploring legal options to compel Telstra to halt its practices and potentially provide restitution for any misleading statements.

Q: What is the ACCC’s position so far?

A:

The ACCC has confirmed it is “considering” Vodafone’s referral but has not yet declared a formal investigation.

Q: What role does ACCAN play in this dispute?

A:

ACCAN, Australia’s foremost consumer advocacy organization for communications, backs Vodafone’s call for an examination. It has highlighted the possible detriment to regional consumers and called for stringent regulatory measures should Telstra’s actions be found misleading.

Q: How does this impact regional customers?

A:

If Telstra’s coverage assertions are proven to be overstated, regional Australians may have been misled into selecting Telstra over more cost-effective or comparable options under the false impression that it was the only trustworthy alternative.

Q: Has Vodafone previously attempted to access Telstra’s regional network?

A:

Yes. Vodafone has previously approached the ACCC to obtain access to Telstra’s regional network for roaming, but that request was rejected. Additionally, a later network-sharing proposal between TPG Telecom and Telstra was also blocked by the Competition Tribunal.

Q: What steps follow?

A:

The ACCC is assessing the complaint. Should it find substance in Vodafone’s allegations, it may initiate a formal inquiry, which could lead to penalties, required clarifications from Telstra, or more extensive modifications in how mobile coverage marketing is conducted across the sector.

Cyber Criminals Utilize AI to Mimic Senior US Officials, Experts Caution


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Quick Read

  • Cybercriminals are faking identities of high-ranking US officials utilizing AI-driven voice and text messages.
  • Victims are manipulated into clicking harmful links under the guise of continuing discussions on alternative platforms.
  • These links redirect users to websites controlled by hackers that aim to steal login details.
  • The operation is focused on notable persons, including both current and former government officials.
  • The FBI has alerted the public to the rising utilization of AI in cybercrimes such as deception and coercion.
  • Experts in Australian cybersecurity caution that similar strategies might be implemented domestically.

AI-Enhanced Impersonation Scams Escalate Cyber Risks

Cybercriminals utilizing AI-generated voices to imitate US government officials

Cybercriminals are exploiting artificial intelligence to masquerade as prominent US officials in an intricate phishing scheme, according to recent alerts. The FBI has disseminated a public service announcement stating that nefarious individuals are employing AI-generated voice and text communications to illicitly access the personal accounts of state and federal officials.

This scam entails developing a connection with the victims before maneuvering the dialogue to another messaging medium. In numerous situations, this secondary platform is a facade—a phishing site designed to capture sensitive information like usernames and passwords.

Understanding the Scam Dynamics

Transitioning from Messages to Harmful Links

Cybercriminals initiate engagement through text or voice communication, masquerading as significant individuals such as senior officials. Once trust is garnered, they steer the target towards another communication medium. This new platform serves as a disguise—a phishing operation meant to extract confidential data.

The Contribution of AI to the Deception

Criminals are increasingly adopting generative AI technologies to produce convincingly realistic materials. These tools can replicate voices, craft believable text messages, and even emulate video representations. The FBI’s caution corresponds with wider global anxieties concerning the use of AI in deepfake scams, misinformation, and identity theft.

What This Means for Australia

Are Australian Officials Next in Line?

Although this campaign primarily focuses on US government officials, cybersecurity specialists in Australia anticipate that similar efforts will inevitably extend to Australian territory. High-ranking officials, business leaders, and even journalists could emerge as targets in forthcoming AI-driven impersonation attempts.

The Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC) notes that phishing continues to be one of the most pervasive threats to Australians, recording over 74,000 cybercrime incidents in 2023 alone—an almost 23% increase compared to the prior year. AI-driven assaults may drastically enhance the effectiveness of such scams.

Cybersecurity Experts Urge for Increased Awareness

Recognising Deepfake Threats

Experts advise validating the identity of any unexpected messages, even when they appear to originate from familiar sources. Look for inconsistencies in tone, grammar, or unexpected demands. Strongly recommended are multi-factor authentication and the adoption of encrypted mediums for sensitive conversations.

The Importance of Public Education

Awareness and education play essential roles in counteracting these risks. Organizations should equip employees to identify signs of impersonation attacks and invest in tools that can detect synthetic media and phishing URLs. Governments and businesses must also proactively utilize AI defensively to identify anomalies.

Conclusion

Cybercriminals are harnessing artificial intelligence to impersonate prominent officials in a recent series of phishing schemes. By using AI-driven voice and text communications, they build trust before leading targets to harmful websites. These frauds represent a concerning trend where generative AI is misused for cybercrime, prompting serious worries for both global and Australian cybersecurity. Awareness, education, and advanced protective measures are crucial in addressing this escalating threat.

FAQs

Q: How do cybercriminals exploit AI in phishing scams?

A:

They utilize AI to create authentic-sounding voice messages and texts mimicking public figures. This enables them to gain the trust of victims prior to diverting them to phishing websites that collect sensitive information like usernames and passwords.

Q: Who primarily falls victim to these AI-based impersonation schemes?

A:

Current and former senior officials in the US government and their associates are the main targets. Nevertheless, cybersecurity experts caution that similar methodologies might soon be applied to target leaders in government and industry worldwide, including Australia.

Q: What actions should I take if I receive a questionable message from a public figure?

A:

Avoid clicking on any links or sharing personal data. Confirm the sender’s identity through official channels or reach out to them using known contact numbers. Report the message to pertinent authorities or your organization’s IT division.

Q: Can AI-generated content be detected?

A:

Yes, there are developing tools and software capable of identifying AI-generated content, particularly deepfake audio and visuals. However, these technologies are still in progress, making human awareness critical.

Q: Is Australia vulnerable to similar AI phishing operations?

A:

Indeed. As cybercriminals refine their tactics, Australian officials and corporations may find themselves at risk. The ACSC has highlighted the growing complexity of scams, and AI is likely to be a significant factor in future threats.

Q: What measures can organizations implement to safeguard themselves?

A:

Employ multi-factor authentication, provide ongoing cybersecurity training, and invest in AI detection technologies. Additionally, fostering a culture of caution regarding unsolicited messages or demands is vital.

Q: How can individuals protect themselves from such scams?

A:

Maintain skepticism towards unsolicited communications, especially those requesting personal information or encouraging link clicks. Always verify the source independently and utilize robust, unique passwords for each account.

Q: What role does TechBest play in cybersecurity education?

A:

TechBest is dedicated to keeping Australians informed about the latest technological and cybersecurity threats. We offer timely updates, threat assessments, and expert insights to help you stay secure in a progressively digital environment.