Australia Tech News - Page 13 of 137 - Techbest - Top Tech Reviews In Australia

REVIEW: Upgrades to Google Pixel Watch 4 Render It an Essential Option to Weigh

Matthew Miller on November 9, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Google Pixel Watch 4 Review – TechBest

Quick Overview

  • Notable enhancements in display with superior resolution.
  • Introduction of Google Gemini for improved AI engagement.
  • Collaboration with Fitbit for all-encompassing health monitoring.
  • Refined design featuring thinner bezels and upgraded materials.
  • Latest Snapdragon W6 Gen 1 chipset for enhanced efficiency.
  • Improved battery longevity, lasting up to 40 hours per charge.
  • Offered in multiple models and sizes, starting at A$579.

Display and User Experience

The Google Pixel Watch 4 features a spacious, high-definition display, simplifying the reading of notifications and media right from your wrist. This enhancement allows users to check photos and intricate reminders without needing to access their phones, increasing the practicality of the watch.

AI Features with Google Gemini

With the inclusion of Google Gemini, the Pixel Watch 4 allows for voice commands and internet connectivity right from the wrist. This functionality removes the necessity of reaching for your phone, granting effortless access to information and enhancing usability.

Health Monitoring with Fitbit

Google’s purchase of Fitbit has facilitated robust health monitoring integration in the Pixel Watch 4. Fitness lovers can easily track their metrics and progress, with detailed data accessible directly on the watch and via the Fitbit app.

Design Enhancements

The Pixel Watch 4 retains its distinctive domed glass design while minimizing bezel size for a fresher appearance. Offered in both 41mm and 45mm sizes, the watch is safeguarded by upgraded Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, ensuring durability for active users.

Performance Upgrades

Equipped with the Snapdragon W6 Gen 1 chipset, the Pixel Watch 4 provides seamless performance and enhanced energy efficiency. Battery life has been remarkably extended, with the larger model achieving up to 40 hours, surpassing the limitations of earlier iterations.

Notable Features

  • Gemini On-Wrist: Delivers AI-driven functionality directly on the watch interface.
  • Extended Battery Duration: Facilitates prolonged usage without the need for frequent recharging.
  • Next-Gen Health Monitoring: Includes extensive health metrics such as ECG and SpO2.
  • Emergency SOS: Automatically connects to emergency services in critical situations.
  • Superior Display: Brightness up to 2500 nits assures readability in bright lighting conditions.

Challenges and Opportunities

While the Pixel Watch 4 represents a remarkable advancement, some users may find the default band design uncomfortable. Furthermore, a premium “Pro” variant could attract professionals desiring a more upscale design.

Pricing and Accessibility

The Pixel Watch 4 can be found throughout Australia, with entry prices beginning at A$579 for the 41mm Bluetooth/Wi-Fi version. It is available for purchase through Google’s official online store and various major retailers.

Overall Impression

The Google Pixel Watch 4 marks a significant advancement in the smartwatch landscape, delivering improvements in design, performance, and health monitoring capabilities. While it commands a premium price, the features it encompasses make it a worthy option for users looking to leverage its full abilities.

Summary

The Google Pixel Watch 4 is an excellent option for Android users in search of a feature-rich smartwatch. With considerable upgrades in display, AI features, and health monitoring, it distinguishes itself in the bustling wearable market, providing a seamless integration of style and technology.

Q&A

Q: What are the primary advancements in the Pixel Watch 4?

A: The Pixel Watch 4 offers a larger, high-quality display, Google Gemini AI functionality, and Fitbit health integration.

Q: How does the battery performance compare to earlier models?

A: The 45mm variant provides up to 40 hours of battery life, a major enhancement over previous models.

Q: Is the watch appropriate for fitness enthusiasts?

A: Absolutely, with Fitbit connectivity, users can conveniently track health metrics and progress.

Q: Are different design options available?

A: Yes, the watch is offered in 41mm and 45mm sizes, along with various band choices for personalization.

Q: What is the entry price for the Pixel Watch 4?

A: The entry price is A$579 for the 41mm Bluetooth/Wi-Fi model.

Australia and the US Take Action with Sanctions Against North Korean Cyber Operations

Nicholas Webb on November 9, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Australia and US Intensify Efforts with Sanctions on North Korean Cyber Operations

Quick Overview

  • Australia targets four entities and one individual associated with North Korean cybercrime through sanctions.
  • Sanctioned groups consist of the notorious Lazarus Group, Andariel, and Kimsuky.
  • US Treasury’s OFAC follows suit with similar sanctions against North Korean hackers.
  • Reportedly, North Korea’s cyber activities have yielded US$3 billion in illegal earnings.
  • Cooperative initiatives by Australia and its allies to monitor and mitigate North Korean cyber threats.

Australia’s Sanctions on North Korean Cyber Operations

Australia has enacted financial measures and travel restrictions on four entities and one individual tied to North Korea’s infamous cryptocurrency theft schemes. Foreign Minister Penny Wong revealed the sanctions directed at the Lazarus Group hackers, recognized for the 2014 Sony Pictures breach and the 2017 WannaCry ransomware incident.

Australia and US impose sanctions on North Korean cyber operations

Entities Under Investigation

The entities facing sanctions include the Lazarus Group and its subgroup Andariel, which targets international defense, aerospace, nuclear, and engineering sectors. Another group, Kimsuky, is focused on espionage against South Korean government bodies, think tanks, and foreign policy experts.

US Treasury’s Actions Against Cybercrime

At the same time, the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has imposed sanctions on North Korean hackers and organizations. OFAC states that North Korea depends on cybercrime to finance its weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile endeavors. Cybercriminals have allegedly accumulated US$3 billion, mainly through cryptocurrency heists.

OFAC’s Focused Measures

OFAC has placed sanctions on two North Korean bankers, Jang Kuk Chol and Ho Jong Son, connected to ransomware activities. Additionally, entities such as Korea Mangyongdae Computer Technology Company (KMCTC) and Ryojung Credit Bank have been singled out for money laundering and financial dealings supporting North Korean IT personnel.

Global Cooperation Against Cyber Threats

Australia, along with ten Western allies, has recently published a report from the Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team (MSMT), shedding light on North Korea’s cyber operations and breaches of United Nations Security Council resolutions. The report emphasizes the global community’s resolve to address North Korean cyber threats.

Conclusion

The coordinated sanctions by Australia and the US illustrate a robust response to North Korea’s cyber activities. By focusing on significant entities and individuals involved in cybercrime, both nations aim to curtail the illegal financial channels financing North Korea’s weapons programs. Through worldwide collaboration and ongoing oversight, the international community strives to diminish the danger posed by these cybercriminal operations.

Q: What motivated Australia to impose sanctions on North Korean entities?

A: Australia imposed sanctions in response to North Korea’s participation in cryptocurrency theft and cybercrime activities that support its weapons programs.

Q: Which entities are primarily targeted by Australia’s sanctions?

A: Australia’s sanctions focus on the Lazarus Group, Andariel, Kimsuky, and Park Jin Hyok, a programmer associated with these cyber activities.

Q: What is the estimated revenue generated by North Korean cyber activities?

A: North Korean cyber activities are estimated to have generated US$3 billion, mainly from cryptocurrency theft.

Q: What role does the US Treasury’s OFAC play in this context?

A: OFAC has sanctioned North Korean hackers and organizations, concentrating on those involved in ransomware activities and financial transactions linked to illicit operations.

Q: What is the importance of the MSMT report?

A: The MSMT report details North Korea’s cyber operations and breaches of UN resolutions, stressing the necessity for international collaboration to tackle these threats.

Q: What strategies does the international community plan to implement to combat North Korean cyber threats?

A: Through coordinated sanctions, oversight, and collaboration, the international community aims to disrupt the financial streams and mitigate the cyber threat posed by North Korea.

DVA Evaluates ChatGPT-Powered Tool with 300 Staff Members

Nicholas Kinports on November 8, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

AI in Governance: DVA’s ChatGPT-Driven Tool Experiment

Quick Overview

  • The Department of Veteran’s Affairs (DVA) is piloting an AI chatbot called CLIKChat.
  • This proof-of-concept phase includes participation from 300 DVA personnel.
  • CLIKChat’s goal is to facilitate access to policy and compensation details.
  • The tool utilizes the OpenAI ChatGPT 4.1 Mini model.
  • CLIKChat does not have the capability to access personal or veteran files.
  • Only staff trained in AI are authorized to use this tool.
  • The public and DVA clients will not have access to CLIKChat.
  • Its development aligns with national AI guidelines for responsible governmental use.

DVA’s AI Project: CLIKChat

The Department of Veteran’s Affairs (DVA), Australia’s foremost veterans’ support agency, has initiated a new technological venture by commencing a proof-of-concept trial for a chatbot named “CLIKChat.” Composed of 300 employees from the claims benefits sector, this initiative seeks to assess whether the tool can enhance customer interaction efficiency.

DVA tests ChatGPT-based tool with 300 staff members

Design and Features

Utilizing OpenAI’s ChatGPT 4.1 Mini model, CLIKChat is crafted to simplify the access to DVA records and policy details. Nevertheless, it is important to note that it does not retrieve personal information or veteran records, nor does it render decisions or offer recommendations. Instead, it acts as a digital assistance tool, ensuring claims teams can swiftly explore publicly accessible information with increased precision.

Internal Application and Training

CLIKChat is exclusively intended for internal use. Access to the tool is restricted to staff members who have undergone necessary AI training, though specifics regarding the training program are not revealed. The tool remains unavailable to the public or DVA clients, emphasizing its function as a support system for internal processes.

Development Protocols and Guidelines

Commencing in May and beginning its trial in October, the development of CLIKChat adheres to national AI policies and frameworks, specifically the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government. This ensures that the application of AI remains ethical and effective within governmental functions.

Comparable Initiatives and Future Directions

The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations has created a similar AI tool named Parlihelper, which summarises Senate estimates sessions. Moreover, other governmental entities, such as the National Archives, are investigating AI applications to assist with vital tasks, reflecting a wider trend towards AI incorporation in public services.

Conclusion

The DVA’s trial of the CLIKChat AI tool signifies a notable advancement in utilizing technology to improve operational effectiveness. By complying with national guidelines and focusing on internal enhancements without jeopardizing personal information, the initiative highlights a careful yet forward-thinking stance towards AI adoption within governmental systems.

Q&A Session

Q: What is the primary objective of CLIKChat?

A: CLIKChat’s goal is to improve access to policy and compensation information for DVA staff, enhancing customer engagement and accuracy.

Q: Who is permitted to use CLIKChat?

A: CLIKChat is strictly for internal purposes and available to DVA staff who have completed the AI training. It is not open to the public or DVA clients.

Q: Does CLIKChat have access to personal or veteran information?

A: No, CLIKChat does not access personal or veteran records and does not provide decisions or recommendations.

Q: On what model is CLIKChat based?

A: CLIKChat is based on OpenAI’s ChatGPT 4.1 Mini model.

Q: How does CLIKChat maintain ethical standards?

A: The development of CLIKChat is aligned with national AI policies and frameworks, particularly the Policy for the responsible use of AI in government.

M365 Portal Faces Challenges Due to Increase in Copilot Refund Requests

David Leane on November 8, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Microsoft Confronts Refund Issues Amid Copilot Dispute

Brief Overview

  • Microsoft is inundated with refund requests for its Copilot AI add-on to M365.
  • Australia’s ACCC has charged Microsoft with deceiving consumers regarding M365 pricing.
  • Customers are facing difficulties in securing refunds and downgrading their subscriptions.
  • The ACCC’s legal actions persist despite Microsoft’s proposal for refunds.

Microsoft’s Refund Challenges

Microsoft has been flooded with refund requests for its Copilot AI add-on to the Microsoft 365 (M365) suite. Following the announcement of a refund initiative, the company experienced unexpectedly long customer support wait times. Microsoft claims it has been working to resolve this influx, which has now decreased.

The ACCC’s Claims

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has charged Microsoft with misleading 2.7 million Australian users concerning the pricing available for its M365 plans. The core issue centers on whether Microsoft hid a less expensive “classic” subscription option without Copilot, directing customers toward pricier plans that included the AI feature.

Customer Reports

Despite Microsoft’s apology and refund offer, several customers are reporting challenges when attempting to downgrade to the classic version without AI, asserting that a clear option to do so is absent in their account settings. Moreover, some have been advised to contact Microsoft during US business hours for assistance with their problems.

Ongoing Legal Actions

The ACCC has indicated that its legal pursuit against Microsoft continues independently of the company’s refund strategy. The regulator is seeking penalties, injunctions, and court declarations, striving for effective remedy for consumers.

Conclusion

Microsoft is currently tackling major hurdles regarding refund requests for its M365 Copilot AI add-on. With legal pressures from the ACCC and dissatisfaction among customers, the tech giant is managing a complex situation that highlights the importance of transparency in subscription services. The resolution of these developments may have significant implications for Microsoft’s business activities in Australia.

Q&A

Q: What is the primary concern regarding Microsoft’s Copilot refund process?

A: Customers are facing challenges in obtaining refunds and downgrading to a “classic” M365 subscription without the Copilot AI add-on.

Q: Why is the ACCC involved in this case?

A: The ACCC has accused Microsoft of misleading Australians about the pricing options for M365 plans, leading to legal intervention.

Q: Has Microsoft cleared the backlog of refund requests?

A: Microsoft reports that the influx of refund requests has decreased following the initial surge.

Q: What actions can affected customers take?

A: Customers encountering issues should reach out to Microsoft support, although some may need to contact them during US business hours for resolution.

Q: Will the ACCC cease its legal actions after Microsoft’s refund initiative?

A: No, the ACCC continues to pursue legal action, seeking penalties and effective consumer redress despite the refund program.

Q: What potential effects could this situation have on Microsoft in Australia?

A: Ongoing legal issues and customer dissatisfaction could affect Microsoft’s reputation and operations in the Australian market.

M365 portal buckling as demand for Copilot refunds soar

Tesla’s Daring Step: Text Messaging While Driving Function Undergoes Regulatory Review in Australia

Matthew Miller on November 7, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Australia scrutinizes Tesla's texting feature while driving

Brief Overview

  • Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology could soon permit texting while driving.
  • This capability encounters legal and regulatory obstacles in Australia.
  • Handheld mobile phone usage while driving is currently prohibited by Australian law.
  • Severe penalties and demerit points are enforced for infractions in Australia.
  • Tesla may have to take on liability for accidents that occur with FSD activated.
  • AI-enhanced surveillance cameras are utilized in Australia to enforce mobile usage laws.

Tesla’s Ambitious Plans: Texting and Driving

Elon Musk, famous for his bold declarations, recently stated at the 2025 Tesla Shareholder Meeting that Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology might soon permit drivers to “text and drive” safely in the near future. This announcement has ignited considerable discussion and regulatory examination, particularly in countries like Australia, where mobile phone use while driving is heavily regulated.

Legal Challenges in Australia

Australia’s traffic safety laws are strict, making handheld mobile phone use while driving illegal throughout the nation. This encompasses all forms of texting, scrolling through social media, or even holding the device while stopped at lights. The legal consequences of Tesla’s upcoming FSD features are substantial, as this technology challenges established laws meant to maintain road safety.

Existing Laws and Consequences

In Australia, drivers with valid licenses must follow rigorous regulations that ban most mobile phone usage. Violating these rules can lead to significant fines and demerit points that vary across states. For example, in New South Wales, fines can be as high as A$562 in school zones, along with five demerit points. Repeat offenders face potential license revocation and increased insurance costs, highlighting the necessity of these protective measures.

Technology’s Role in Enforcement

To address unlawful mobile phone usage, Australian states such as NSW, VIC, and QLD utilize AI-powered detection systems to observe drivers. These technologies capture and analyze images for violations, resulting in infringement notices being sent by mail. This automated enforcement supports immediate fines enforced by law enforcement, thereby improving road safety.

Concerns Over Insurance and Liability

Should Tesla move forward with its FSD feature, the company might have to accept liability for accidents that happen while the software is in use. Tesla already provides its own insurance offerings in select areas, possibly leveraging data to assess fault. However, third-party insurance providers may reject claims against Tesla unless there is an official admission of liability, leaving drivers at risk of lacking coverage during incidents.

Conclusion

Tesla’s ambitious initiative to integrate a texting capability via its Full Self-Driving technology faces major regulatory and legal barriers in Australia. While the innovation promises improved safety, it contradicts existing laws meant to minimize distractions while driving. As this discussion progresses, Tesla and regulatory agencies will need to navigate these intricacies to ensure the safety of drivers and compliance with legal standards.

Q: What is Tesla’s upcoming FSD feature?

A: Tesla plans to permit texting while driving with its Full Self-Driving software, anticipated to launch soon.

Q: Are there legal issues in Australia?

A: Indeed, Australia enforces strict regulations against handheld phone usage while driving, presenting challenges for Tesla’s feature.

Q: What penalties exist for unlawful phone usage in Australia?

A: Penalties include fines up to A$1,251 and demerit points, varying by state, with possible license suspension for habitual offenders.

Q: How is mobile phone usage monitored in Australia?

A: AI-driven cameras along with police enforcement issue penalties for violations, ensuring adherence to traffic safety laws.

Q: Will Tesla take responsibility for accidents?

A: Tesla may need to embrace liability for accidents that occur under FSD usage to reduce legal exposure and provide insurance coverage.

Q: What are the insurance concerns for Tesla owners?

A: Owners could encounter difficulties with third-party insurers unless Tesla formally acknowledges liability for incidents related to FSD.

Q: How does this affect new drivers?

A: Learner and P1 license holders face stricter bans on phone usage, reinforcing the development of safe driving practices early on.

Microsoft reveals an innovative ‘superintelligence’ group

Vanessa May on November 7, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Brief Overview

  • Microsoft is establishing the MAI Superintelligence Team to create AI that outperforms human abilities in particular fields, beginning with medical diagnostics.
  • The initiative seeks to achieve “humanist superintelligence,” concentrating on addressing specific challenges for the benefit of humanity.
  • Microsoft is making substantial investments in this project, led by AI leader Mustafa Suleyman.
  • The team’s focus will be on specialized AI models that deliver superhuman results without existential dangers.
  • Microsoft aims to realize medical superintelligence within two to three years, potentially extending lifespan.

Establishment of the MAI Superintelligence Team

Microsoft has unveiled the creation of a new team committed to developing artificial intelligence (AI) that transcends human capabilities in specific areas. This bold endeavor, named the MAI Superintelligence Team, will initially hone in on medical diagnostics, intending to transform this vital sector.

Microsoft establishes MAI Superintelligence Team

Funding and Recruitment Plans

Under the guidance of Mustafa Suleyman, the head of AI at Microsoft, the company intends to allocate a significant financial investment to this venture. While specifics on recruitment strategies have not been revealed, Suleyman has indicated that Microsoft AI will continue to draw talent from leading laboratories, strengthening its team with existing researchers and appointing Karen Simonyan as the chief scientist.

A Human-Centric AI Vision

In contrast to some competitors, Microsoft’s strategy does not aim to develop “infinitely capable generalist” AI. Suleyman has voiced doubts about the controllability of autonomous, self-enhancing machines. Instead, the emphasis is on “humanist superintelligence,” dedicated to solving specific, tangible issues that benefit humanity.

Emphasis on Specialized AI Models

The MAI Superintelligence Team will be dedicated to creating specialized AI models that can reach superhuman levels of performance in specific fields without introducing existential threats. Examples include AI that tackles battery storage challenges or innovates new molecules, similar to DeepMind’s AlphaFold, which forecasts protein structures.

Goals for Medical Superintelligence

Microsoft envisions reaching medical superintelligence within two to three years. This progression could greatly enhance life expectancy by facilitating the early detection of preventable diseases, potentially granting individuals worldwide more healthy years. However, major advancements are still required to make this ambition a reality.

Conclusion

Microsoft’s launch of the MAI Superintelligence Team signifies a pivotal move toward crafting AI that exceeds human competence in particular fields. By adopting a humanistic approach, the initiative aims to tackle real-world issues without the dangers linked to generalist AI. With prospective advancements in medical diagnostics, this effort could transform healthcare, improving both longevity and quality of life.

Q: What is the main focus of Microsoft’s new AI team?

A: The MAI Superintelligence Team is set to develop AI that excels beyond human capabilities in designated areas, starting with medical diagnostics.

Q: How does Microsoft’s approach differ from other companies?

A: Microsoft prioritizes “humanist superintelligence,” targeting specific problems for human benefit, rather than designing autonomous, self-enhancing machines.

Q: What is the timeline for achieving medical superintelligence?

A: Microsoft seeks to achieve medical superintelligence within the next two to three years, depending on essential breakthroughs.

Q: What potential advantages does medical superintelligence offer?

A: Medical superintelligence could increase life expectancy and provide additional healthy years through earlier detection of preventable diseases.

Q: Who is at the helm of the MAI Superintelligence Team?

A: The initiative is spearheaded by Mustafa Suleyman, the AI chief, with Karen Simonyan as the chief scientist.

Q: What kind of AI models is Microsoft focusing on?

A: Microsoft is centering its efforts on specialized AI models capable of delivering superhuman performance in specific areas while avoiding existential risks.

NAB Reaches Significant Landmark by Moving Tech Positions In-House

Matthew Miller on November 7, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

NAB’s Tech Evolution: Internal Growth and AI Emphasis

Quick Overview

  • NAB changes its employee-contractor ratio to 70/30, prioritizing employees.
  • 90% of NAB’s applications have transitioned to the cloud.
  • AI adoption has increased to 15,000 team members for improving task efficiency.
  • Over 4,500 engineers at NAB are now employing generative AI for development tasks.
  • Pete Steel is set to join NAB as Group Executive for Digital, Data, and AI soon.
  • NAB’s statutory net profit for FY25 amounts to $6.76 billion.

Reducing Contractor Reliance

The National Australia Bank (NAB) has successfully transformed its workforce structure, emphasizing in-house employees over contractors. At the close of FY25, 71% of the technology and enterprise operations team consists of NAB employees, a notable change from 2018 when contractors accounted for 70% of the workforce. This adjustment underscores the bank’s dedication to lessening external reliance and bolstering internal strengths.

NAB achieves milestone with tech role insourcing

Cloud Transition Achievements

NAB has achieved significant milestones in migrating its applications to the cloud. Currently, 90% of its applications have been transitioned, an increase from 85% just half a year ago. This initiative is part of NAB’s overall plan to enhance operational efficiency and scalability through cloud solutions.

Enhancing AI Integration

AI is increasingly embedded in NAB’s operations. The bank now has more than 4,500 engineers utilizing generative AI for software development, up from 2,500 six months ago. Additionally, 15,000 employees are leveraging AI to optimize routine tasks, and 1,400 frontline staff are using AI-driven tools to improve customer service.

Leadership and Future Directions

The forthcoming appointment of Pete Steel as Group Executive for Digital, Data, and AI is anticipated to further drive NAB’s AI initiatives. Steel’s expertise will aid the bank’s strategic objectives regarding customer experience, employee efficiency, software development, and operational productivity.

Financial Performance

In spite of technological advancements, NAB reported a statutory net profit of $6.76 billion for FY25, a slight decrease from $6.96 billion in FY24. The bank remains committed to aligning technology investments with its long-term strategic vision.

Conclusion

NAB’s technological evolution illustrates a strategic pivot towards insourcing and significant AI adoption. The bank’s initiatives in cloud migration, AI integration, and diminishing contractor reliance reflect its commitment to modernization and operational excellence.

Q: What is NAB’s current employee-contractor ratio?

A: NAB currently operates with a 70/30 ratio favoring employees, reversing the former 30/70 ratio.

Q: What percentage of NAB’s application portfolio has been migrated to the cloud?

A: 90% of NAB’s applications have made the transition to the cloud.

Q: How many NAB employees are utilizing AI for routine tasks?

A: 15,000 NAB employees are using AI to enhance efficiency for routine tasks.

Q: Who is the newly appointed Group Executive for Digital, Data, and AI at NAB?

A: Pete Steel will be joining NAB as the Group Executive for Digital, Data, and AI.

Q: What is NAB’s net profit for FY25?

A: NAB recorded a statutory net profit of $6.76 billion for FY25.

Microsoft rushes to rectify Copilot packaging mistake

Vanessa May on November 6, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Microsoft’s Reply to ACCC Claims About M365 Pricing

Microsoft’s Reply to ACCC Claims About M365 Pricing

Microsoft managing Copilot pricing controversy

Quick Overview

  • Microsoft Australia is confronting ACCC claims concerning M365 subscription pricing.
  • The firm is alleged to have obscured a non-AI subscription choice.
  • Microsoft has initiated refunds for Australian customers who may be impacted.
  • Possible refunds could reach as high as $175 million.
  • The ACCC asserts that customers experienced automatic price increases due to AI integration.

Context of the ACCC Claims

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accused Microsoft of misleading 2.7 million Australians. The allegation focuses on the pricing structures for Microsoft’s M365 offerings, particularly regarding the integration of the AI tool, Copilot, into these subscriptions.

Microsoft’s Reaction and Customer Refunds

In light of the allegations, Microsoft has enacted measures to address potential fallout. Recently, the company has made offers for refunds to Australian clients, which may amount to millions of dollars. In an official statement, Microsoft expressed regret for not being more transparent about the existence of a non-AI subscription option.

The corporation has reached out to subscribers via email, outlining more affordable alternatives without AI and providing refunds to those qualified for switching to the original version of the M365 subscription.

Specifics of the Allegations

The ACCC claimed that Microsoft did not disclose the availability of a classic subscription plan devoid of Copilot. Since late October last year, customers on auto-renewing subscriptions reportedly were informed that their only choice to maintain M365 access was to accept increased charges for Copilot or cancel the service entirely.

This tactic allegedly led to an annual cost increase of $50 for the M365 Personal edition, raising the annual total to $159. The ACCC contends that this approach was intended to reduce the rate of customers opting out of AI integration while elevating prices.

Prospective Financial Consequences and Microsoft’s Future Actions

It remains uncertain how many customers qualify for the refund or how many will take advantage of the offer. Nevertheless, based on subscription costs, Microsoft might need to refund as much as $175 million if a notable number of customers decide to revert to the unbundled plan.

Conclusion

Microsoft Australia is under examination from the ACCC due to claims of deceptive subscription pricing concerning its M365 offerings. The company is criticized for concealing a non-AI subscription alternative, which led to automatic price increases for consumers. In response, Microsoft has proposed refunds to impacted customers, which could have substantial financial ramifications.

Q: What are the primary allegations made by the ACCC against Microsoft?

A: The ACCC claims that Microsoft misled clients by failing to disclose a non-AI subscription choice for its M365 plans and automatically raised prices to include Copilot.

Q: What has been Microsoft’s response to these allegations?

A: Microsoft has issued refunds to Australian customers potentially affected by the pricing situation and highlighted the availability of a non-AI subscription option.

Q: What financial repercussions might Microsoft encounter due to these claims?

A: Microsoft could face refunds reaching up to $175 million if many customers opt to switch back to the unbundled plan without Copilot.

Q: How did the ACCC assert that Microsoft limited customer awareness of the classic subscription option?

A: The ACCC alleges that Microsoft provided only a seven-day notice of the price increase and did not mention the unbundled option in communications, thereby reducing customer awareness and choices.

Q: What options do affected customers have in regard to this matter?

A: Customers may choose to stay on their current subscription with Copilot, switch to the classic plan without Copilot, or accept a refund if they qualify.

Australia Unveils Innovative Quantum Diamond Foundry, Indicating a Significant Advancement in Tomorrow’s Technology

Vanessa May on November 6, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Victoria’s Quantum Breakthrough: A Pioneering Advance in Diamond Technology

Victoria’s Quantum Breakthrough: A Pioneering Advance in Diamond Technology

Brief Overview

  • Victoria unveils the first-ever commercial quantum diamond foundry globally.
  • Diamonds cultivated in labs are integrated into circuits to amplify computing strength.
  • Facility backed by A$31 million from government funding.
  • Quantum technology promises advancements in medical and technological fields.
  • Facility aims to foster a skilled workforce and enhance local proficiency.
  • Australia’s quantum sector may reach a value of A$6 billion by 2045.

Launching the Quantum Diamond Foundry

Victoria has initiated a revolutionary quantum diamond foundry, signifying a crucial step in the domain of quantum technology. This state-of-the-art facility emphasizes incorporating lab-grown diamonds into computer circuits, significantly boosting computing power. These diamond-based innovations promise the development of smaller, portable quantum devices that operate effortlessly at room temperatures.

Financial Support and Investments

The creation of this foundry has been reinforced by major financial support from the State Government. A preliminary A$8 million investment was succeeded by an extra A$10 million, along with assistance from the Made in Victoria: Industry R&D Infrastructure Fund. Additionally, the National Reconstruction Fund contributed A$13 million, enhancing local manufacturing capabilities and ensuring the ethical production of these advanced diamonds domestically.

Repercussions for Quantum Technology

Quantum technology is prepared to transform computing and sensing, surpassing the capabilities of conventional systems. This advanced technology is set to fast-track discoveries in medical remedies and drug creation. The local fabrication of quantum diamond devices will not only enhance Victoria’s expertise but also generate a skilled workforce, positioning Victoria at the forefront of diamond quantum technologies. Forecasts from CSIRO indicate that Australia’s quantum technology sector could reach a valuation of A$6 billion, providing jobs for 19,400 people by 2045.

Addressing Technological Hurdles

A significant obstacle in quantum technology has been the requirement for cooling quantum systems. Quantum Brilliance is leading efforts to overcome this limitation, aiming to establish quantum computing as a mainstream technology. The foundry’s debut signals a transition from prototype research to commercial production, satisfying future demands across diverse sectors.

Voices from the Industry and Government

“The Albanese Labor Government is delighted to support a Future Made in Australia – where innovation aligns with sovereign capability. With investment from the NRF, Quantum Brilliance’s new quantum diamond foundry in Victoria is a global pioneer, providing a compelling example of how public funding can unleash private creativity and stimulate economic expansion. Australia boasts a distinguished history of excellence in quantum technology research. Through this investment, we are actualizing our National Quantum Strategy’s objectives by empowering the local quantum sector to flourish.”

– Tim Ayres, Minister for Industry and Innovation and Minister for Science.

Prospective Developments

Dr. Marcus Doherty, CTO of Quantum Brilliance, emphasized the foundry’s capacity to unveil diamond-based quantum technologies. By producing high-quality quantum diamonds at scale, the facility aims to speed up the design and manufacturing of quantum diamond devices. This advancement intends to build a resilient local supply chain, potentially catering to global quantum hardware producers.

Australia's Quantum Diamond Foundry: A Technological Milestone

Conclusion

The inauguration of Victoria’s quantum diamond foundry signifies a key leap in quantum technology, powered by extensive government investment and strategic collaborations within the industry. This facility is set to propel Australia into a leading role in global quantum research and development, with potential uses across various sectors.

FAQ Section

Q: What distinguishes the quantum diamond foundry?

A:

It stands as the world’s inaugural commercial facility weaving lab-grown diamonds into computer circuits, boosting quantum computing capabilities.

Q: In what ways has the government facilitated this project?

A:

The State Government has invested A$31 million, with further backing from the National Reconstruction Fund and the Made in Victoria Fund.

Q: What are the potential uses for this technology?

A:

Quantum technology holds the potential to transform medical treatments, pharmaceutical development, and a variety of computing and sensing functions.

Q: What economic impacts are anticipated for Australia?

A:

Australia’s quantum sector might be valued at A$6 billion by 2045 and create approximately 19,400 jobs, boosting economic development.

Q: What challenges does quantum technology encounter?

A:

The primary challenge has been the cooling needs for quantum systems, which the new foundry seeks to address.