Blog - Techbest - Top Tech Reviews In Australia

Technics AZ100 True Wireless Noise Cancelling Bluetooth Earbuds Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Technics AZ100 True Wireless Noise Cancelling Bluetooth Earbuds with Magnetic Fluid Driver, Voice Focus AI, 3 Device Multipoint Connectivity, LDAC Compatible, Black (EAH-AZ100E-K)

OPPO Enco Air4 Pro True Wireless Earphones Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

OPPO Enco Air4 Pro True Wireless Earphones, 44h Autonomy, Titanium Driver 12.4 mm, Bluetooth 5.4, Touch Controls, AI Noise Cancellation, Android and iOS, IP55, [Italian Version],White

Three Executives Associated with Spyware Removed from US Sanctions List


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

US Removes Intellexa Spyware Executives from Sanctions List

Quick Overview

  • Sanctions removed from three leaders associated with the Intellexa spyware group.
  • The US Treasury Department partially overturns prior sanctions set by Biden’s administration.
  • Intellexa’s Predator spyware implicated in global surveillance scandals.
  • Executives proved their separation from Intellexa to aid in their delisting.

US Relaxes Sanctions on Intellexa Leaders

Executives affiliated with Intellexa spyware have been removed from the US sanctions list

Context of Sanctions

The US administration, led by President Joe Biden, had previously imposed sanctions on seven individuals connected to the Intellexa group. This was part of a wider effort to address the spread of surveillance technologies to authoritarian governments.

Intellexa and Its Worldwide Influence

Led by former Israeli intelligence officer Tal Dilian, Intellexa has found itself at the center of controversies concerning its “Predator” spyware, including alleged spying on journalists and political opponents in Greece, as well as reported attempts by the Vietnamese government to breach the accounts of US Congress members.

Sanctions Overturned

The US Treasury Department’s recent move to lift sanctions on three executives—Sara Hamou, Andrea Gambazzi, and Merom Harpaz—signals a change in approach. A US official indicated that this was part of a standard administrative procedure following requests for a review, with the individuals taking steps to distance themselves from the consortium.

Continued Issues

Even with some individuals removed from the sanctions list, Intellexa and its founder Tal Dilian continue to be under investigation for their roles in enabling surveillance practices. The consortium remains a central topic in debates regarding the ethics and ramifications of commercial spyware.

Conclusion

The relaxation of sanctions on executives associated with Intellexa showcases the complexities surrounding the regulation of the global spyware sector. While some individuals have managed to show their disassociation from contentious practices, broader ethical dilemmas related to such technologies remain unresolved.

Q: Why were sanctions first applied to Intellexa leaders?

A: Sanctions were established due to Intellexa’s part in promoting the spread of spyware technology to authoritarian regimes and accusations of misuse in surveillance efforts.

Q: What prompted the removal of sanctions on the three executives?

A: The executives took actions to extricate themselves from the Intellexa group, leading the US government to reevaluate the sanctions as part of an administrative initiative.

Q: What significance does Intellexa’s “Predator” spyware have in these controversies?

A: “Predator” spyware is tied to numerous surveillance scandals, including the tracking of journalists and political officials in Greece, alongside attempts to hack US Congress members.

Q: Are all Intellexa leaders currently free of sanctions?

A: No, Tal Dilian, the head of Intellexa, is still on the sanctions list, indicating ongoing concerns about his involvement in the group’s activities.

Q: How has Intellexa responded to these charges?

A: Representatives of Intellexa have not issued statements regarding the lifting of sanctions, and Tal Dilian has denied involvement in specific claims, including those concerning Greece.

“Wireless Bluetooth 5.3 Sports Headphones Review”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Bluetooth Sports Headphones, in-Ear Headphones, Wireless Bluetooth 5.3 with HD Mic, Outstanding Sound, 40 Hours Playtime, Comfort Fit, Dual LED Display, IP7 Waterproof Earphones with Ear Hooks, Black

Soundcore by Anker AeroFit Pro Open-Ear Headphones Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Soundcore by Anker AeroFit Pro Open-Ear Headphones, Ultra Comfort, Secure Fit, Ergonomic Design, Rich Sound with LDAC, Bluetooth 5.3, IPX5 Water-Resistant, 46H Playtime, App Control (Dynamic Black)

Two US Cyber Specialists Acknowledge Responsibility in ALPHV Blackcat Partnership Scandal


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Cybersecurity Controversy: US Experts Admit Guilt

Brief Overview

  • Two American cybersecurity experts confess to working with the ransomware collective ALPHV Blackcat.
  • Ryan Goldberg and Kevin Martin could face a maximum of 20 years in prison for their extortion conspiracy.
  • The individuals previously held positions at esteemed cybersecurity firms DigitalMint and Sygnia.
  • This case reveals significant vulnerabilities in the digital security sector.
  • The identity of a third co-conspirator is still unknown.

US Cybersecurity Experts Linked to Ransomware Controversy

Two American cybersecurity experts, Ryan Goldberg and Kevin Martin, have admitted guilt in their collaboration with the ALPHV Blackcat group. The US Justice Department reported that the pair confessed to conspiring to disrupt commerce through extortion. Their connections to this infamous ransomware organization have rocked the cybersecurity landscape.

Cybersecurity experts guilty of collaborating with ALPHV Blackcat

Background of the Accused

Ryan Goldberg, age 40, and Kevin Martin, age 36, were prominent names in the cybersecurity domain. Goldberg had previously been with Sygnia, while Martin served at DigitalMint. Both firms have distanced themselves from their former employees’ actions, stressing that the illegal acts occurred without their awareness or participation.

The Connection to ALPHV Blackcat

The ALPHV Blackcat group earned infamy for targeting several US firms. Goldberg and Martin, together with an unnamed third co-conspirator, leveraged their expertise to assist the gang in encrypting corporate networks to extract millions in cryptocurrency. The group’s activities ceased following a significant cyberattack on UnitedHealth Group last year, after which they disappeared.

Implications for the Industry

This case highlights the vulnerabilities present in the cybersecurity industry, where insiders may exploit their roles to collaborate with cybercriminals. It also underlines the necessity for rigorous vetting and surveillance procedures for cybersecurity professionals.

Conclusion

Two American cybersecurity experts have confessed to conspiring with ALPHV Blackcat, a well-known ransomware organization, to extort US companies. With their sentencing set for March, this case raises alarms about insider threats in the cybersecurity sector.

Inquiries and Responses

Q: What charges have Goldberg and Martin confessed to?

A: They have confessed to conspiring to disrupt commerce through extortion.

Q: What potential sentences do they face?

A: They confront a possibility of up to 20 years in prison.

Q: Which companies did Goldberg and Martin work for in the past?

A: Goldberg was associated with Sygnia, and Martin worked for DigitalMint.

Q: What is ALPHV Blackcat renowned for?

A: ALPHV Blackcat is recognized for utilizing ransomware to extort cryptocurrency from American firms.

Q: How did the companies react to the scandal?

A: Both Sygnia and DigitalMint condemned their former employees’ actions and cooperated with the inquiry.

Q: Is the third co-conspirator known?

A: No, the identity or condition of the third alleged co-conspirator is still unknown.

Q: What lessons can the industry take from this case?

A: The situation emphasizes the necessity for solid security measures and monitoring to stave off insider threats within cybersecurity firms.

Soundcore Liberty 5 by Anker Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

soundcore Liberty 5 by Anker, Noise-Cancelling Wireless Earbuds, 2x Stronger Voice Reduction, Real-Time Adaptive Noise Cancellation, Fast Charging, Dolby Audio, 6-Mic AI Clear Calls

Meta Hit with Lawsuit by US Virgin Islands Regarding Fraudulent Advertisements and Issues of Child Safety


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Meta Engages in Legal Dispute Over Alleged Fraudulent Advertisements and Child Safety Concerns

Lawsuit filed against Meta by US Virgin Islands regarding fraudulent ads and child safety

Overview

  • The US Virgin Islands is suing Meta regarding purported scam advertisements and child safety issues.
  • The lawsuit suggests that 10% of Meta’s anticipated 2024 income may originate from deceptive advertisements.
  • Two US senators have called for an investigation into Meta’s advertising practices.
  • Meta refutes the allegations, pointing to a decline in reported scams.
  • Internal documents indicate contentious guidelines for chatbots.

Charges Against Meta

The government of the US Virgin Islands has filed a lawsuit against Meta Platforms, the parent entity of Facebook and Instagram, claiming it has gained financially from scam advertisements while failing to adequately protect children on its platforms. The complaint alleges that Meta deliberately exposes users to deceptive material to enhance engagement and profit.

Expected Income from Deceptive Advertisements

As outlined in court filings, Meta is expected to generate around US$16 billion (AU$23.9 billion) in 2024 from advertisements related to scams, illegal gambling, and prohibited products, according to a Reuters report. The lawsuit alleges that Meta’s algorithms only prevent advertisers suspected of scams when there is a 95% chance of wrongdoing.

Reactions from Industry and Government

In light of these disclosures, US senators have urged the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Trade Commission to investigate and take necessary action. The lawsuit seeks sanctions against Meta for infringing upon consumer protection laws.

Meta’s Response

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone has rejected the allegations contained in the lawsuit, stating that the company is actively pursuing the elimination of scams on its platforms. He claims that reports of scams have decreased by half over the last 18 months. Stone further denied assertions regarding the safety of young users on Meta’s platforms, emphasizing a dedication to child protection.

Contentious Chatbot Protocols

In a related matter, internal documents from Meta reportedly permitted AI chatbots to have inappropriate discussions with minors. Subsequently, Meta has updated these protocols to eliminate any allowances for romantic interaction with children.

Conclusion

The US Virgin Islands has initiated legal action against Meta, alleging that the company has profited from fraudulent advertisements and has not sufficiently safeguarded children on its platforms. While Meta denies these allegations, the lawsuit has prompted demands for regulatory scrutiny and has brought to light ongoing issues surrounding online safety and advertising ethics.

Q&A Section

Q: What are the primary accusations against Meta?

A: The lawsuit claims that Meta is profiting from fraudulent advertisements and is not adequately protecting children on its platforms, including Facebook and Instagram.

Q: What is the projected revenue for Meta from deceptive ads?

A: Meta is projected to earn approximately US$16 billion (AU$23.9 billion) from scam-related advertisements in 2024.

Q: What steps have US senators taken concerning these allegations?

A: US senators have requested that the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Trade Commission investigate Meta’s advertising practices.

Q: How has Meta reacted to the lawsuit?

A: Meta has rejected the allegations, citing a notable decrease in reports of scams and reaffirming its commitment to user safety.

Q: What adjustments were made to Meta’s chatbot protocols?

A: Meta revised its protocols to exclude any provisions allowing chatbots to engage in romantic or inappropriate conversations with minors.

NBN’s “50 Gig” Experiment: Groundbreaking Innovation or Just a Reddit Prank?


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Brief Overview

  • A Reddit entry purports a 50Gbps NBN test, but it is likely a fabrication.
  • The supposed speed test reveals significant technical anomalies.
  • NBN’s current top enterprise speed is capped at 10Gbps.
  • Current residential offerings peak at 2Gbps for home connections.
  • There are lab tests for 50G-PON, although they are not accessible to the public.

The Controversial Assertion: 50Gbps NBN Test

A message on the subreddit r/nbn has stirred interest, proposing a covert 50Gbps NBN Enterprise Ethernet trial. The poster, using the alias Future_Muffin_8248, shared a screenshot displaying an alleged 46,059 Mbps download speed utilizing an unpublished Nokia ONT and UniFi configuration. Upon investigation, this assertion seems questionable.

NBN's 50Gbps Trial: Reality or Myth?

The Truth Check: Technical Warning Signs

1. The Asymmetry Dilemma

The reported speed test indicates a notable difference between download (~46,000 Mbps) and upload (~4,800 Mbps) speeds. NBN’s Enterprise Ethernet provides symmetrical speeds, which makes such a disparity a definite warning sign.

2. The Server Limitation

The speed assessment was performed on an Aussie Broadband server, currently capable of a maximum of 10Gbps for business clients. Public Speedtest servers typically operate at 10Gbps or 40Gbps, rendering the 46Gbps claim physically improbable.

3. Equipment Constraints

The assertion involves UniFi equipment, which is now optimized for up to 25Gbps. Attaining 50Gbps would necessitate specialized hardware not offered in the current market.

Current NBN Status (December 2025)

  • Residential Multi-Gig: As of September 2025, NBN Co has launched a 2Gbps “Hyperfast” tier.
  • Enterprise Maximums: The highest tier available for commercial use is 10Gbps.
  • Next-Generation Equipment: New NTDs are being rolled out, capable of supporting up to 8Gbps.

The Conclusion: Fabrication

Although NBN Co has experimented with advanced 50G-PON and 100G-PON technologies, these experiments are not available for public or consumer application. The blend of asymmetrical speeds, server limitations, and non-compliant hardware strongly suggests that this assertion is a “Speedtest Spoof.” Remain alert, and be aware that unmatched upload and download speeds typically indicate a false claim.

FAQ

Q: What prompted the 50Gbps NBN assertion?

A: A Reddit user shared a screenshot claiming to take part in a secret NBN test, displaying extremely high download speeds.

Q: Why is this claim deemed a fraud?

A: The claim exhibits technical discrepancies, such as unequal speeds and equipment limits, which are consistent with typical spoofing practices.

Q: What are the current speed offers from NBN?

A: NBN’s maximum enterprise speed is 10Gbps, while residential options recently reached a “Hyperfast” 2Gbps tier.

Q: Are there any legitimate tests for higher NBN speeds?

A: Indeed, NBN Co has performed lab trials for 50G-PON and 100G-PON, but these are not yet public.