Overview

• ANCAP will refresh vehicle rating criteria starting in 2026, concentrating on advanced driver assistance technologies (ADAS).
• New guidelines aim to decrease deaths and serious injuries related to vehicles.
• ADAS will be assessed under actual conditions, considering factors like weather and visibility.
• Driver monitoring systems will receive recognition for offering non-intrusive, smart assistance.
• Physical controls for key functions will be promoted to minimize driver distraction.
• Electric vehicles must ensure that door handles and high-voltage systems are safe after a crash.
• Increased focus will be directed towards the effectiveness of eCall systems for emergency responses.

Transforming Vehicle Safety with Advanced Driver Assistance Technologies

The Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) is poised to transform vehicle safety benchmarks from 2026, highlighting advanced driver assistance technologies (ADAS) to bolster the safety of new vehicles. This transformation signifies a major change in vehicle evaluations, centering around four fundamental safety phases—Safe Driving, Crash Avoidance, Crash Protection, and Post-Crash.

Key Updates Explained

Despite progress in vehicle safety and an increasing number of affordable 5-star rated vehicles, road fatalities remain a serious issue. The new ANCAP protocols are intended to tackle this challenge by integrating consumer insights and adapting to technological advancements, ensuring safety features perform reliably in real-world scenarios.

Innovative Evaluation for Advanced Driver Assistance Technologies

Real-World Assessment

ANCAP will conduct thorough testing of ADAS to verify that features such as Automatic Emergency Braking operate effectively in various situations—day or night, rain or shine. This method aims to ensure that crash avoidance technologies safeguard drivers in everyday circumstances, rather than only in controlled settings.

Enhancements to Driver Monitoring

A significant introduction is the “Driver State Link,” which rewards systems that assess driver engagement, distraction, and fatigue without issuing intrusive alerts. This initiative fosters a smooth driving experience, activating only when deemed necessary to avert potential incidents.

Lane Support Technologies

Beginning in 2026, ANCAP will favour lane support technologies that seamlessly integrate with the driver, preventing collisions without being obtrusive. The evaluation will take into account the system’s responsiveness and how easily drivers can counteract any corrections.

Simplicity in Design and Safety

Physical Interfaces

ANCAP will commend manufacturers that emphasize straightforward, accessible controls for critical functions, thereby reducing driver distraction and increasing safety. While voice controls provide a modern solution, the emphasis remains on tactile interfaces for quick, intuitive interaction.

Considerations for Electric Vehicles

Electric vehicle door handles, commonly found in EVs, must remain operational after a collision. Additionally, EVs should automatically disconnect their high-voltage battery following an accident and alert first responders, ensuring prompt and safe emergency actions.

Enhancing Post-Crash Safety

ANCAP will place a stronger focus on the efficacy of eCall systems, which automatically reach out to emergency services after an accident. Although adoption is increasing in Australia, New Zealand is lagging, leading ANCAP to advocate for wider implementation of this life-saving technology.

Conclusion

The 2026 modifications to ANCAP’s safety protocols signify a holistic approach to automotive safety, merging advanced technologies for a more secure driving landscape. By prioritizing real-world applicability and unobtrusive assistance, ANCAP aims to lessen road fatalities and elevate vehicle safety standards across Australia and New Zealand.

Questions & Answers

Q: What new emphasis areas will ANCAP’s 2026 protocols cover?

A: The new areas of emphasis include Safe Driving, Crash Avoidance, Crash Protection, and Post-Crash phases, with a focus on advanced driver assistance technologies (ADAS).

Q: How will ANCAP assess Advanced Driver Assistance Technologies?

A: ANCAP will evaluate ADAS under diverse real-world conditions, measuring their effectiveness in various weather and visibility contexts.

Q: What updates are expected for driver monitoring technologies?

A: Systems will be recognised for tracking driver engagement without intrusive alerts, promoting a seamless driving experience.

Q: What measures will be taken for electric vehicle safety?

A: EVs will need to maintain functional door handles post-crash and automatically isolate high-voltage batteries, enhancing safety during emergencies.

Q: How does the eCall system factor into ANCAP’s new protocols?

A: The eCall system, which communicates with emergency services after a crash, will be a central point for improving post-crash safety, with ANCAP encouraging wider adoption in New Zealand.

Brief Overview

• ATA calls on the government to make public a list of devices that can make dependable emergency calls.
• Presently, compliance is optional and may miss several devices with problems.
• Telecom providers are creating a private database for in-house purposes.
• Recent failures in devices tied to deaths are sparking public and governmental alarm.

The Demand for a Public Device Registry

The Australian Telecommunications Alliance (ATA) is urging the federal government to set up a public registry of mobile phones that can securely make emergency calls, referred to as “triple zero” calls. This demand comes after a deadly outage on the Optus network led to a parliamentary investigation.

The Justification for a Public Registry

The ATA contends that the existing device compliance framework is inadequate. The Telecommunications Labelling Notice is voluntary, requiring manufacturers to self-report compliance without obligatory public sharing. The suggested public registry would serve as a dependable reference for both consumers and regulators to confirm device compliance and safety.

Ongoing Initiatives by Telecoms

In response to persistent rejection from the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), telecommunications companies have begun to develop their own database. This internal system aims to monitor devices known to have emergency call issues, assisting telcos in fulfilling regulatory requirements. However, this database will not be accessible to the public.

Issues with Device Compliance

The challenge of testing for compliance is currently significant. With more than 40,000 different phone models in Australia, the existing systems only assess a small percentage. This implies that numerous devices that may have problems could escape regulatory oversight, particularly those entering through grey markets.

Government and Regulatory Reactions

The ACMA has tightened testing regulations for devices, especially concerning their ability to switch networks in emergencies. Nonetheless, public scrutiny and recent incidents have intensified demands for more thorough measures.

Recent Events and Public Anxiety

Recent news has connected defective handsets with several fatalities, raising public alarm. For example, certain older Samsung devices have been flagged as problematic, leading carriers to block these models if they are not updated or exchanged within a specified timeframe.

Conclusion

The ATA’s request for a public device registry underscores significant shortcomings in the current compliance framework. While telcos develop internal solutions, the urgency for a publicly available registry is highlighted by recent failures and deaths. The ongoing parliamentary inquiry and governmental actions will likely influence future regulatory directions.

Q: What is the necessity for a public register of compliant devices?

A: A public register would offer a trustworthy source of information for consumers and regulators, ensuring that devices can reliably make emergency calls and minimize the potential for failures.

Q: What are the existing issues with the voluntary compliance structure?

A: The voluntary structure depends on manufacturers self-reporting compliance, which may allow devices with problems to evade scrutiny, especially those entering from grey markets.

Q: How have recent failures affected public opinion?

A: Recent fatalities linked to device failures have heightened public concern and attention, leading governmental and regulatory bodies to rethink current practices.

Q: What measures are telecom companies taking to tackle these problems?

A: Telecom companies are establishing private databases to track non-compliant devices internally, although these will not be accessible to the public.

Q: What role does the ACMA have in ensuring device compliance?

A: The ACMA establishes technical standards and supervises the Telecommunications Labelling Notice, requiring manufacturers to declare device compliance, albeit currently on a voluntary basis.

Q: Are all problematic devices being adequately addressed by the current system?

A: No, only a limited number of devices are tested each year, leaving many problematic devices without resolution, particularly those from grey markets.

Q: What potential actions might the government undertake in the future?

A: The ongoing parliamentary inquiry and public demand may result in the creation of a public register and stricter compliance requirements.