Blog - Page 42 of 190 - Techbest - Top Tech Reviews In Australia

“Could Tesla Autopilot V14 Be the Beginning of Integrating AP and FSD Next Month?”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Quick Read

  • Elon Musk reveals Tesla Autopilot V14 is scheduled for release next month.
  • This will be the first occasion where Autopilot’s version matches that of Full Self-Driving (FSD).
  • The change may indicate a transition towards an all-encompassing AI model for Autopilot.
  • Expected enhancements include a more seamless driving experience and minimized phantom braking.
  • Autopilot V14 might facilitate activation on roads without markings.
  • Tesla owners in Australia are looking forward to the FSD launch amidst ongoing trials.

Could Tesla Autopilot V14 Signal the Integration of AP and FSD Next Month?

Elon Musk has recently unveiled plans for Tesla Autopilot V14, which is set to debut next month. This development is notable as it’s the first time that Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) share the same version identification. The news has ignited enthusiasm regarding potential advancements for Tesla owners who do not have FSD.

Possible Transition to End-to-End AI

Traditionally, Tesla’s Autopilot has relied on an older code structure, lagging behind the end-to-end neural network model of FSD. The launch of ‘Tesla Autopilot V14’ indicates a potential switch to FSD’s codebase with certain functions disabled for Autopilot. This shift could boost Autopilot’s efficiency, tackling prevalent problems such as phantom braking by enhancing the AI’s ability to perceive and navigate its surroundings.

Smoother and More Trustworthy Features

This update may render aspects of Tesla’s software stack, including smart summon, autopark, and navigate on autopilot, more fluid and dependable. This change would allow Tesla to concentrate on honing AI models through training data instead of relying on human-written code.

Challenges and Hardware Enhancements

Musk has pointed out that FSD V14 will substantially increase the count of model parameters, presenting challenges for older Tesla vehicles equipped with HW3 hardware. While there is an assurance to provide hardware updates for these models, a timeline remains unspecified.

Capabilities on Unmarked Roads

Another fascinating prospect with Autopilot V14 is the ability to activate the system on unmarked roads, a feature previously noted internationally with FSD. For users in Australia, this could provide greater adaptability in navigating unmarked routes, enhancing the driving experience.

Expected Performance Advances

Owners anticipate that phantom braking will be diminished or eradicated, as observed with the latest FSD V13 iterations. The forthcoming version is expected to deliver heightened performance by a considerable margin.

Tesla Autopilot V14 merging AP and FSD

FSD Launch in Australia

Even after displaying FSD in Melbourne and Sydney, Tesla owners in Australia are still waiting for its launch. Tesla’s Country Director confirmed that testing is nearing completion, but the software has yet to be released to the public. The anticipated V14 launch could explain this holdup, as Tesla may prefer to roll out the latest version directly to new markets.

Conclusion

The forthcoming launch of Tesla Autopilot V14 could signify a pivotal change toward integrating Autopilot with FSD, utilizing a cohesive end-to-end AI framework. This update holds promises for smoother operations, fewer complications like phantom braking, and potential additional features such as navigating unmarked roads. Tesla owners in Australia remain optimistic about the FSD rollout as the launch of V14 approaches.

Q&A

Q: What is noteworthy about the Tesla Autopilot V14 announcement?

A: It marks the initial occasion where Autopilot’s version number coincides with Full Self-Driving (FSD), indicating a possible integration of the two systems.

Q: In what ways might Autopilot V14 enhance the driving experience?

A: The update might result in smoother driving and lesser phantom braking by implementing an end-to-end AI model similar to FSD.

Q: Will Autopilot V14 permit driving on unmarked roads?

A: There is a chance that Autopilot V14 could enable driving on unmarked roads, providing users with more flexibility.

Q: What is causing the delay in the FSD rollout in Australia?

A: Tesla might be postponing the release until the V14 is launched to directly introduce the most recent version in fresh markets, including Australia.

Q: What difficulties are anticipated with the new FSD V14?

A: The increase in model parameter counts may create challenges for older Tesla vehicles equipped with HW3 hardware, resulting in potential upgrade needs.

Q: How could this update influence Tesla’s software framework?

A: Features such as smart summon, autopark, and navigate on autopilot are projected to be more fluid and reliable.

Microsoft pledges to finalize the transition to quantum-resistant cryptography by 2033


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Microsoft’s Initiative for Quantum-Resistant Cryptography

Quick Overview

  • Microsoft intends to finalize its shift to quantum-safe encryption by 2033, ahead of the 2035 international deadline.
  • Scalable quantum computing presents dangers to existing encryption techniques, potentially endangering digital security.
  • Microsoft’s methodology encompasses a three-step incorporation of quantum-safe cryptography within its offerings.
  • The company partners with worldwide standards organizations to guarantee global compatibility of quantum-safe standards.
  • Microsoft’s Majorana 1 quantum processor signifies a major advancement in its journey towards quantum safety.

Recognizing the Quantum Threat

As quantum computing technology evolves, it has the capability to undermine current cryptographic systems. Microsoft cautions that forthcoming scalable quantum computers could dismantle existing public-key cryptography, threatening digital signatures, authentication processes, and identity validation.

Microsoft’s Proactive Strategy

Microsoft is devoted to shifting all its products and services to quantum-resistant cryptographic techniques by 2033. This initiative is driven by the anticipated power of quantum computing and the possibility of the “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later” (HNDL) attack method, wherein encrypted information could be retained now and decrypted later when quantum capabilities advance.

Three-Step Transition Strategy

Microsoft’s transition plan is organized into three stages:

Stage 1: Foundational Security

The initial stage includes the incorporation of post-quantum cryptography algorithms into SymCrypt, Microsoft’s main cryptographic library, ensuring uniform security across platforms like Windows, Azure, and Microsoft 365.

Stage 2: Core Infrastructure

The second stage is centered on upgrading core infrastructure services, including authentication and key management systems, to accommodate quantum-safe encryption.

Stage 3: Complete Integration

The concluding stage aims to apply quantum-safe measures throughout all Microsoft services, facilitating early adoption of these capabilities by 2029 and establishing them as defaults where feasible.

Working Together for Global Standards

Microsoft is collaborating with essential regulatory and technical organizations like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) to establish consensus on quantum-safe encryption standards. This cooperation guarantees global compatibility and a smooth transition to new cryptographic standards.

Overview

Microsoft is making substantial efforts to protect its services against impending quantum computing threats. By outlining a thorough transition to quantum-resistant cryptography, the company is establishing a proactive benchmark in the tech sector. With strategic alliances and staged implementations, Microsoft is prepared to spearhead the effort in preserving digital security in the quantum age.

Q: Why is Microsoft prioritizing quantum-resistant cryptography at this time?

A:

Microsoft seeks to counteract potential future threats from quantum computing that may undermine current encryption techniques. By taking early action, they can facilitate a seamless transition and uphold security standards.

Q: What does the “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later” scenario entail?

A:

This concept involves malicious actors saving encrypted data today with the plan to decrypt it later when quantum computers are capable of breaching existing encryption mechanisms.

Q: What is the functioning of Microsoft’s three-step approach?

A:

The method includes embedding quantum-safe cryptography into foundational security elements, upgrading the core infrastructure, and thoroughly integrating these strategies across all services.

Q: What is the role of global standards organizations in this transition?

A:

These organizations assist in aligning quantum-safe encryption standards internationally, ensuring interoperability and a cohesive transition to new cryptographic techniques.

Q: What importance does Microsoft’s Majorana 1 quantum processor hold?

A:

The Majorana 1 processor symbolizes a critical leap in Microsoft’s quantum research, bolstering the company’s wider objectives in attaining quantum-safe cryptography.

Kanye West Unveils Memecoin (YZY), Soars to $3 Billion Before Plummeting Amid Internal Turmoil


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Kanye West's Memecoin YZY Launches and Crashes

Quick Read

  • Kanye West, now referred to as Ye, debuts memecoin YZY on the Solana blockchain.
  • YZY’s market capitalization skyrocketed to US$3 billion before plummeting amid insider turmoil.
  • Initially, 94% of YZY’s total supply was held by insiders, prompting fears of market manipulation.
  • YE Pay and YZY Card enhance YZY’s functionality beyond being merely a meme.
  • Within 24 hours, the memecoin’s market cap fell below US$1 billion.
  • Critics alleged that the venture might be a potential “rug pull” scheme.
  • The launch sparked legal issues and a backlash on social networks.

Kanye West Steps into Cryptocurrency With YZY

Kanye West, now recognized as Ye, has embarked on a journey into cryptocurrency with the introduction of his memecoin, YZY. The announcement was made through a post on X, presenting the coin as an innovative financial concept tied to his Yeezy label. However, the launch quickly became one of the most disputed crypto events since Hawk Tuah.

Technical Overview of YZY

YZY is developed on the Solana blockchain, selected for its rapidity and economical nature, making it a preferred choice for memecoins. Most trading takes place on the Meteora decentralized exchange. Even with a liquidity pool established, early worries surfaced regarding its capacity for swift exits.

Supply and Allocation

The aggregate supply of YZY is limited to 1 billion tokens. The distribution approach aimed to discourage sniping, yet it was unsuccessful. An innovative anti-sniping mechanism was applied, employing 25 contract addresses with one being randomly selected for the official YZY. Nevertheless, 94% of the supply was initially in the hands of insiders, including a multisig wallet controlling 87%, which raised concerns.

Connected Tools

In addition to the coin, Kanye launched YE Pay, a cryptocurrency payment processor that promises lower fees for businesses. Furthermore, the YZY Card enables users to utilize YZY and USDC in transactions worldwide. These features place YZY within a larger ecosystem, although its success depends on sustaining value and trust.

Price Boom and Collapse

YZY saw a dramatic increase, surging by over 1,000% in just 40 minutes from the launch, hitting a market capitalization of US$3 billion (A$4.5 billion). This increase drew a large number of traders. However, within a day, the value of the coin decreased by 66%, reducing the market cap to below US$1 billion. Currently, YZY is trading at approximately US$0.86 per token, with a market cap of US$258 million (A$387 million).

The Emerging Controversy

What started as a buzz soon unraveled into controversy, with claims of insider trading and biased distribution. The single-sided liquidity pool on Meteora allowed insiders to retain control, leading to allegations of prospective “rug pull” strategies. Investigations indicated that a small number of wallets gained a substantial profit, while more than 56,000 users incurred losses.

Legal Escapes and Reactions

The project’s terms encompass a class action waiver, transferring potential legal responsibilities to users. Social media platforms were filled with claims of scams and rug pulls. This situation underscores the dangers of celebrities initiating memecoins, often resulting in monetary losses for supporters and tarnishing reputations.

Conclusion

Kanye West’s venture into the cryptocurrency market with the YZY memecoin rapidly became contentious. Despite an initial valuation surge, insider conflicts and distribution challenges led to a notable decline. The complexities of the launch and the following backlash serve as a cautionary tale for celebrities entering the digital currency landscape.

Q: What is YZY?

A: YZY is a memecoin launched by Kanye West, built on the Solana blockchain, intended to offer a new financial concept tied to his Yeezy brand.

Q: Why did YZY’s value crash?

A: YZY’s value crashed due to allegations of insider trading, unfair distribution, and concerns of potential manipulation, leading to a dramatic drop in market cap.

Q: What tools are associated with YZY?

A: Associated tools include YE Pay, a crypto payment processor, and YZY Card, allowing users to spend YZY and USDC globally.

Q: What legal concerns arose from the YZY launch?

A: The project’s terms include a class action waiver, leading to backlash and accusations of shielding against lawsuits if the venture fails.

Q: How was the YZY distribution model intended to work?

A: The distribution model was designed to deter snipers by using 25 contract addresses, with one randomly chosen for the official YZY, but it failed to prevent insider control.

Q: How has the public reacted to YZY?

A: The public reaction has been largely negative, with accusations of scams and manipulation, resulting in significant financial losses for many traders.

JBL Live Free NC+ True Wireless in-Ear Noise Cancelling Headphones Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

JBL Live Free NC+ – True Wireless in-Ear Noise Cancelling Bluetooth Headphones with Active Noise Cancelling, Microphone, Up to 21H Battery, Wireless Charging (Black)

AI Browsers Prone to Scams and Phishing, Security Professionals Caution


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

AI Browsers Prone to Fraud and Phishing, Experts in Security Warn

AI Browsers Succumb to Fraud and Phishing Attempts

Quick Read

  • AI browsers such as Comet have weaknesses against fraud and phishing.
  • Research by Guardio called “Scamlexity” evaluated AI vulnerabilities.
  • While AI browsers can automate processes, they lack human skepticism.
  • It’s essential to incorporate security protocols into AI browsing systems.
AI browsers susceptible to fraud and phishing, researchers in security reveal

The Weaknesses of AI Browsers

Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) web browsers, which are created to carry out tasks independently, are demonstrating a high level of vulnerability to fraud and phishing, as indicated by a report from Guardio, a consumer security firm. The study, referred to as “Scamlexity,” showcases the naivety of AI browsers when confronted with both traditional and novel cyber threats.

Guardio’s “Scamlexity” Study

Guardio’s investigation concentrated on the Comet browser developed by Perplexity.ai, featuring agentic AI abilities that enable it to automate intricate online tasks, such as comparing prices and adding products to shopping carts. Despite its sophisticated capabilities, Comet imposes certain restrictions for security purposes, like not inputting personal or payment details.

Evaluating AI Vulnerabilities

Guardio devised scenarios to examine how AI browsers like Comet react to counterfeit ecommerce and phishing websites, along with prompt injection assaults. In one scenario, Comet was deceived into processing a purchase on a counterfeit Walmart site, acquiring an Apple Watch. In another instance, Comet was duped by a phishing email that presented itself as a task from Wells Fargo Bank, leading to the input of user credentials on a fraudulent login interface.

AI Browsers and Security Hazards

The weaknesses observed in AI browsers stem from their design, which emphasizes user experience and lacks the skepticism inherent in human judgment. AI systems generally exhibit excessive trust and execute commands devoid of context, rendering them susceptible to exploitation.

Requirement for Integrated Security Protocols

Guardio underlines the critical need for incorporating established security measures such as phishing detection, URL reputation assessments, domain spoofing notifications, and malware file scanning into the decision-making frameworks of AI browsers.

Industry Reaction

Perplexity, the firm behind the Comet browser, recognizes the security issues underscored by Guardio, highlighting the significance of seriously addressing these vulnerabilities instead of dismissing them.

Conclusion

AI browsers, despite providing sophisticated autonomous features, are exposed to fraud and phishing attempts due to their intrinsic trust and absence of human-like skepticism. Guardio’s “Scamlexity” study reveals notable security threats, accentuating the necessity for integrated security measures to protect AI browsing activities.

FAQs

Q: What are AI browsers?

A: AI browsers are web browsers that utilize artificial intelligence technologies to carry out tasks independently for users.

Q: What vulnerabilities do AI browsers have?

A: AI browsers are susceptible to fraud and phishing attempts due to their inclination to trust readily and lack human skepticism.

Q: How did Guardio assess AI browsers?

A: Guardio executed tests with scenarios involving false ecommerce and phishing websites, as well as prompt injection attacks, to evaluate AI vulnerabilities.

Q: What security protocols are necessary for AI browsers?

A: Security protocols such as phishing detection, URL reputation assessments, and domain spoofing warnings need to be built into AI browsers’ decision-making systems.

Q: What has been the industry’s response to AI browser vulnerabilities?

A: Companies such as Perplexity acknowledge the security issues and emphasize the importance of addressing these vulnerabilities with seriousness.

OnePlus Buds 4 Wireless Earbuds Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

OnePlus Buds 4 Wireless Earbuds,Bass Wave in-Ear Buds,IP55 Tri-Mics AI Earphone,Up to 55dB Adaptive Noise Cancellation,Up to 45Hrs Battery,Grey

Microsoft restricts China’s entry to cyber early warning system


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Microsoft Implements New Cybersecurity Restrictions Against Chinese Entities

Brief Overview

  • Microsoft has limited access to its cyber early warning system for specific Chinese companies.
  • This decision follows accusations of China’s participation in a hacking operation targeting SharePoint servers.
  • Some cybersecurity analysts believe there may be a leak within Microsoft’s Active Protections Program (MAPP).
  • Microsoft is taking measures to safeguard the information provided to its partners from being misused.

A Detailed Examination of Microsoft’s Cybersecurity Measures

Microsoft restricts Chinese access to cyber early warning system

In a pivotal action, Microsoft has restricted several Chinese organizations from accessing its early warning system for cybersecurity threats. This move comes amid allegations that the Chinese government was linked to a recent hacking campaign aimed at Microsoft’s SharePoint servers.

Reasons Behind the Restrictions

The restrictions respond to last month’s extensive hacking attempts on SharePoint servers. Microsoft and various cybersecurity experts have implicated Beijing in these attempts, raising alarms regarding a possible leak from Microsoft’s Active Protections Program (MAPP), which is intended to alert security vendors, including those in China, about potential cyber threats in order to enhance their defenses.

What is Proof-of-Concept Code?

Microsoft has chosen to cease the distribution of “proof-of-concept code” to selected Chinese companies. Although designed to aid cybersecurity professionals in bolstering their systems, this code can also be exploited by hackers to exploit defenders’ vulnerabilities.

Beijing’s Response and Microsoft’s Measures

Despite Beijing’s denial of any role in the hacking events, Microsoft has enacted preventive measures. The company recognizes the risk that information shared with its partners could be misused and has adopted known and confidential strategies to mitigate this risk.

Microsoft’s Inquiry and Future Actions

Microsoft has not revealed specific information about the companies impacted by these restrictions or the progress of its investigation into the hacking events. Nonetheless, the company has reiterated its dedication to evaluating participants and suspending or terminating relationships with any that breach their contractual obligations, particularly those against engaging in offensive cyber operations.

Conclusion

Microsoft’s choice to restrict access for certain Chinese companies to its cyber early warning system underscores the ongoing tensions and challenges present in the global cybersecurity landscape. With allegations of hacking and potential vulnerabilities, the technology leader is taking decisive actions to safeguard its systems and ensure its information remains secure.

Questions & Answers

Q: Why did Microsoft limit access for companies in China?

A: Microsoft implemented restrictions following accusations that Chinese organizations participated in hacking efforts against its SharePoint servers.

Q: What is the Microsoft Active Protections Program (MAPP)?

A: MAPP is a program that alerts security vendors globally about cybersecurity threats ahead of the general public, enabling them to enhance their protective measures.

Q: What is proof-of-concept code, and why does it matter?

A: Proof-of-concept code simulates the operations of malicious software, assisting cybersecurity professionals in fortifying their systems, but it can also be misappropriated by hackers.

Q: How has Beijing reacted to the hacking accusations?

A: Beijing has refuted any claims of involvement in the hacking events aimed at Microsoft’s SharePoint servers.

Q: What measures is Microsoft taking to prevent the misuse of its information?

A: Microsoft is employing both known and confidential strategies to avert misuse while conducting ongoing reviews of participants to identify contractual violations.

House of Marley Champion 2: True Wireless Earbuds Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

House of Marley Champion 2: True Wireless Earbuds with Microphone, Bluetooth Connectivity, 35 Hours Total Playtime, and Sustainable Materials, Signature Black