Blog - Page 41 of 91 - Techbest - Top Tech Reviews In Australia

Gov Copilot Experiment Encounters Challenges Due to Usage Issues and Unfulfilled Anticipations


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Challenges in the Microsoft 365 Copilot Trial for Australian Government

Concerns over Microsoft 365 Copilot trial usage in Australia

Summary

  • Two-thirds of the participants in the Microsoft 365 Copilot federal government trial engaged with the tool “a few times a week” or less.
  • Only one-third of the participants accessed Copilot daily, mainly for summarising meetings and rewriting documents.
  • Challenges included insufficient user interface clarity and outdated Microsoft Outlook versions.
  • Expectations from participants were largely unfulfilled, leading to a decrease in positive perceptions regarding the tool’s efficiency in saving time.
  • Training was linked to the frequency of tool usage, yet many staff members found it challenging to make time for this training.
  • Concerns were expressed about AI-generated meeting transcriptions being exposed to Freedom of Information requests.

Limited Usage Despite High Hopes

A report from the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) has provided insights into the six-month trial of Microsoft 365 Copilot within the Australian federal government. Out of around 5765 licences deployed, it was noted that only a third of the participants used Copilot on a daily basis, while two-thirds engaged with the tool “a few times a week” or less.

The main uses for Copilot included summarising meetings, rewriting content, and providing information. Despite the anticipation surrounding generative AI tools, the trial indicated that many participants felt their expectations were not met, resulting in diminished perceived value after the initial excitement.

Limitations of Self-Reporting and Executive Bias

A significant drawback of the evaluation was its dependency on user self-assessments, which may have influenced the results’ objectivity. Additionally, the trial saw a higher representation of executives, potentially skewing the overall findings.

Nevertheless, the report presents important insights regarding how federal agencies in Australia are incorporating AI tools like Copilot. Despite moderate usage, the findings indicate persistent barriers, particularly related to user interface and accessibility.

Link Between Training and Utilisation

The evaluation identified a distinct correlation between the level of training received and how frequently users engaged with Copilot. The more that training was specifically adapted for the Australian Public Service (APS) environment, the more the tool was utilised.

However, numerous staff found it difficult to carve out time for training amid their work schedules. For those lacking adequate training, the tool often appeared unwieldy as users realized that editing and validating Copilot’s results took longer compared to completing tasks manually.

User Interface Challenges Affect Adoption

One unexpected finding was the frequency with which trial participants overlooked the integration of Copilot within Microsoft 365 applications. For instance, at the CSIRO, many users simply forgot about Copilot’s existence due to the lack of clarity in the user interface.

Focus groups indicated that because the features of Copilot were not immediately apparent, users missed out on recording meetings for transcription or leveraging other beneficial functions. Internal CSIRO research highlighted that the integration with existing Microsoft workflows—considered one of the tool’s significant strengths—was largely undermined due to its lack of visibility.

Varied Experiences Across Microsoft Applications

Users’ experiences with Copilot varied across different Microsoft applications. Those anticipating smoother Excel analysis found themselves disappointed, while others hoping for better Outlook integration were let down when it became clear that their organization used an outdated version of Outlook incompatible with Copilot.

While these technical issues may not solely fall on Microsoft, they complicate the decision of whether Copilot represents a worthwhile long-term investment, particularly when updates are necessary for full functionality.

High Hopes, Disappointing Outcomes

The report emphasizes that participants began the trial with elevated expectations, influenced by marketing that implied Copilot would greatly decrease the time spent on emails and meetings. Unfortunately, these expectations were not realised.

A 32% decline was observed in the belief that Copilot helped save time on emails, alongside a 54% reduction in expectations regarding fewer meetings. Although initial sentiments were optimistic, it soon became evident that the tool did not meet the inflated expectations.

Worries About AI-Generated Meeting Records

A major concern that surfaced during the trial was the possible legal consequences of employing AI for transcribing meeting discussions. Some participants expressed apprehensions that comprehensive AI-produced meeting transcripts might be subject to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, potentially hindering frank discussions in meetings.

The report advises federal agencies to carefully weigh the ramifications of using generative AI technologies like Copilot, especially within sensitive contexts where FOI requests could introduce risks.

Conclusion

The six-month examination of Microsoft 365 Copilot within the Australian government has displayed varied outcomes. While certain users recognized the platform’s utility, especially in meeting summaries, the trial fell short of the high initial expectations. Primary issues included insufficient user interface visibility, outdated software versions, and challenges in training participation. The evaluation also surfaced concerns regarding AI-generated meeting records being susceptible to Freedom of Information inquiries, which could restrict open communication. For now, it appears Copilot has yet to fully demonstrate its worth within the federal government framework.

Q: What was the primary goal of the Microsoft 365 Copilot trial?

A:

The trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and practical value of Microsoft 365 Copilot in assisting federal government employees with tasks such as summarising meetings, rewriting documents, and managing emails. It sought to determine whether Copilot could fulfill its marketing commitments to enhance productivity and save time.

Q: What led to the unmet expectations of the trial participants?

A:

Participants entered the trial with lofty expectations that Copilot, alongside broader generative AI tools, would considerably lessen the time spent on tasks like email management and meeting attendance. Nevertheless, many users found that the outputs required extensive verification and editing, and the tool’s presence within the Microsoft 365 suite was not always evident, resulting in decreased usage and unmet anticipations.

Q: Were there any technical complications that affected the trial?

A:

Yes, several technical challenges impacted the trial. For example, some users were dissatisfied with Copilot’s performance in Excel, while others couldn’t harness its full capabilities in Outlook due to their organization using a less current software version. Additionally, the tool’s lack of visibility within the Microsoft 365 suite was a critical issue, causing users to frequently overlook Copilot’s availability.

Q: How did training affect Copilot usage during the trial?

A:

A clear relationship was found between the level of training users completed and their frequency of Copilot usage. When the training was customized to the context of the Australian Public Service, usage levels improved. Nonetheless, many staff members found it difficult to dedicate time to training, which limited the potential benefits.

Q: What concerns were associated with AI-generated meeting records?

A:

Participants voiced concerns that AI-generated meeting transcripts could be subject to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests. This consideration could hinder candid conversations during meetings, as participants might be more guarded about their statements, aware that detailed transcripts could become public through FOI legislation.

Q: What are the forthcoming actions for the Australian government concerning Copilot?

A:

The report does not specify concrete recommendations for incorporating Copilot into regular government operations. However, it suggests federal agencies thoughtfully consider the consequences of using generative AI tools and provide clearer guidance on the potential legal and ethical issues, particularly concerning matters like FOI requests.

Sony WF-C510 Truly Wireless Earbuds Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Sony WF-C510 Truly Wireless Earbuds – Small, Light, Bluetooth in Ear Headphones with Multipoint Connection, Ambient Sound, IPX4 Rating, Spotify Tap, Quick Charge, 22 HR Battery, iOS & Android – Black

Jabra Elite 3 Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Jabra Elite 3 in Ear Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds – Noise Isolating True Wireless Buds with 4 Built-in Microphones for Clear Calls, Rich Bass, Customizable Sound, and Mono Mode – Lilac

“Victoria Presents Private EV Hillclimb Gathering This Sunday at Rob Roy!”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Victoria Set to Host Exclusive EV Hillclimb Event This Sunday at Rob Roy!

This weekend, electric vehicle (EV) aficionados and motorsport lovers have something special in store as Victoria’s historic Rob Roy Hillclimb prepares for a unique EV event. The Rob Roy All Electric Hillclimb & EV Carshow is scheduled for Sunday, 27th October 2024, from 10 am to 3 pm at 375 Clintons Road, Smiths Gully, VIC. This thrilling event will showcase electric vehicles from prominent manufacturers such as Tesla, MG, BYD, KIA, Polestar, along with custom EV conversions, all vying for position in an exhilarating hillclimb atmosphere.

Quick Overview

  • Date and Time: Sunday, 27th October 2024, 10 am to 3 pm.
  • Venue: Rob Roy Hillclimb, Smiths Gully, Victoria (49 km from Melbourne CBD).
  • Showcased Brands: Tesla, MG, BYD, KIA, Polestar, and custom EV conversions.
  • Entry Fee: A$150 for both timed and non-timed participation.
  • Spectator Advantage: Experience the performance of state-of-the-art electric vehicles in a demanding motorsport environment.
  • Fundraising: Proceeds from the event will aid sustainability efforts at Rob Roy.
  • Improvements: The Rob Roy track underwent significant enhancements in 2023, elevating the racing experience.

What is the Rob Roy Hillclimb?

Rob Roy Hillclimb is a motorsport venue located in Smiths Gully, Victoria, roughly 49 kilometers from Melbourne’s central business district. This location holds substantial historical significance in the Australian motorsport landscape, having been constructed in the 1930s by local pioneers. Some of Australia’s most iconic drivers, including triple F1 champion Jack Brabham, Norm Beechey, and Bob Jane, have raced at Rob Roy.

Following a devastating bushfire in the 1960s, the track was left abandoned. However, revival efforts by the MG Car Club Victoria in the 1990s took place after the closure of another local hillclimb venue, Templestowe. Over the years, the track has benefited from numerous upgrades, most recently in 2022, when government funding facilitated the resurfacing of the track and enhancements to spectator facilities.

Why Host an All-Electric Hillclimb?

This EV-exclusive hillclimb event marks a significant advancement for electric motorsport in Australia. While other nations have already embraced EVs across various motorsport formats, Australia has been slower to follow suit, mainly due to its smaller population and fewer EVs in circulation.

Nevertheless, with a rise in popularity of high-performance electric vehicles like the Tesla Model 3 Performance and the MG4 X-Power, this event presents an excellent chance for EV owners to explore the full potential of their vehicles in a safe, regulated setting. The Rob Roy track’s relatively short distance (about 0.7 km) makes it a perfect location for an EV event, allowing for competitive runs without interruptions from slower traffic.

What to Anticipate at the EV Hillclimb

The event is set to deliver spirited competition, with classes structured based on vehicle specifications such as weight, power, and motor type. This arrangement ensures that all competitors are up against similarly configured vehicles, creating a level playing field. Once all vehicle entries are finalized, the organizers will determine specific classes to foster a fair and competitive environment.

How to Participate in the Event

Participation fees are A$150, applicable for both timed and non-timed events. If you prefer a more relaxed experience, you can sign up for the “Come and Try” category, where your run will not be timed. However, for those seeking a competitive edge, the timed event offers official results.

Requirements to Compete

  • Membership in a Motorsport Australia (MA) affiliated club, such as the Tesla Owners Club or MG Car Club.
  • A helmet that complies with MA regulations.
  • A Motorsport Australia Speed License.
  • Protective clothing covering from wrist to ankle, made of cotton or wool for fire safety.
  • A securely mounted 2kg fire extinguisher readily available to the driver (according to MA rules).
  • Race numbers (issued on the day).
  • Your vehicle must undergo a safety scrutineering check (e.g., working brakes, tires in good condition).
  • Modern vehicles must be in stock condition unless they have a logbook.
  • Classic EV restorations must have road registration.
  • Unregistered EVs are evaluated case-by-case, though uncertified home-built EVs are generally not accepted.

Charging Facilities for EV Participants

While the Rob Roy Hillclimb website currently lists nearby petrol stations, it’s vital to emphasize that charging infrastructure is essential for EV participants. Here are some nearby charging alternatives to consider if you plan to enter the event:


Conclusion

The Rob Roy All Electric Hillclimb & EV Carshow represents a distinctive opportunity to observe or take part in one of Australia’s inaugural dedicated EV hillclimb events. Featuring a combination of high-performance electric vehicles, a historic racing venue, and a commitment to sustainability, this occasion signifies an important milestone for electric motorsport in Australia. Whether you are a competitor or a spectator, this is an event you won’t want to miss!

Q: What is the Rob Roy Hillclimb event?

A: The Rob Roy Hillclimb is a motorsport event taking place at the historic Rob Roy track in Smiths Gully, Victoria. The 2024 event focuses solely on electric vehicles, offering a timed hillclimb competition and an EV car show.

Q: How much does it cost to participate in the EV hillclimb?

A: The participation fee is A$150 for both timed and non-timed events. If you are seeking a more casual experience, you can choose the “Come and Try” category, where your run will not be timed.

Q: What types of EVs will be involved in the event?

A: The event invites a diverse array of electric vehicles, featuring models from Tesla, MG, BYD, KIA, Polestar, and custom EV conversions. Participants will be grouped into classes based on specifications such as weight and power.

Q: What do I need to compete in the event?

A: To take part, you must be a member of a Motorsport Australia (MA) affiliated club, hold an MA Speed License, wear compliant safety gear (helmet, non-flammable clothing), and ensure your vehicle meets safety standards following a scrutineering check.

Q: What is the length of the Rob Roy track?

A: The Rob Roy track spans approximately 0.7 km, featuring several challenging corners. It is a short yet engaging course, perfect for assessing the capabilities of electric vehicles in a managed setting.

Q: Is there charging infrastructure available near the event?

A: Yes, while the Rob Roy Hillclimb website lists nearby petrol stations, we have outlined various charging options in the area to cater to EV participants.

Q: What are the perks for spectators?

A: Spectators will have the chance to see some of the latest and most innovative electric vehicles tackle the historic and demanding Rob Roy track. Additionally, proceeds from the event will support sustainability efforts at the venue.

Victoria Hosts Exclusive Electric Vehicle Hillclimb Event at Rob Roy 2024

Russian Government Boosts iPhone Acquisitions Despite Continuous Security Concerns


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Russian Government Boosts iPhone Acquisitions Amid Continued Security Concerns

Quick Read:

  • The Russian government has quadrupled its iPhone acquisitions from January to September 2023 compared to the same timeframe in 2022.
  • Security apprehensions have resulted in restrictions on certain officials from utilizing Apple products for official duties.
  • The Federal Security Service (FSB) charged the US with conducting espionage through iPhones, which Apple has refuted.
  • In spite of security issues, the demand for Apple’s iPhone 16 continues to surge in Russia, fueled by grey market imports.
  • The digital ministry in Russia has prohibited the use of iPhones for work-related communication.

Surge in iPhone Acquisitions Amid Security Alerts

Notwithstanding persistent security concerns linked to iPhones, the Russian government has markedly increased its acquisitions of Apple devices in 2023. As reported by *Vedomosti*, the number of iPhones purchased by the Russian government from January to September 2023 was fourfold that of the same period in the previous year.

This rise in acquisitions occurs despite official alerts and prohibitions regarding iPhone use among certain government officials. For example, the FSB raised concerns in June 2023 regarding a supposed American espionage initiative that allegedly compromised numerous iPhones through advanced surveillance software. Apple has denied these allegations, but apprehensions remain.

Official Restrictions and Espionage Fears

The Russian government has implemented significant measures to restrict iPhone usage among its officials, particularly for those engaged in sensitive responsibilities like preparations for the upcoming 2024 presidential election. The *Kommersant* newspaper previously indicated that the Kremlin advised officials to steer clear of iPhones due to concerns regarding potential surveillance from Western intelligence agencies.

To further corroborate these concerns, Russia’s digital ministry has prohibited its personnel from utilizing iPhones and iPads for work-related interactions, including emails and official applications. Yet, despite these impediments, the interest in iPhones among government entities appears unaffected.

Grey Market Imports Sustaining iPhone Demand

Remarkably, the demand for iPhones in Russia continues unhindered even after Apple suspended official exports to the nation due to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Russian consumers, encompassing government agencies, can still acquire Apple products via grey or parallel imports. This practice, legalized in Russia to circumvent traditional trade barriers, permits companies to import goods without the brand owner’s approval.

This mechanism has allowed the availability of iPhones, including the latest iPhone 16, in the Russian market, albeit at inflated prices. The total contracts involving iPhones in Russia during the first three quarters of this year reached 6.9 million roubles (approximately AUD 112,000), rising from 1.6 million roubles (around AUD 26,000) during the same period in 2022.

Apple’s Rejection of Espionage Claims

Apple has categorically dismissed any links to the alleged espionage activities cited by Russia’s FSB. The company asserts that its devices remain secure and that it has not collaborated with any government for purposes of compromising privacy. Nonetheless, the persistent worries among Russian officials indicate that fears of espionage continue to be a pressing concern.

Regardless of these issues, Russia persists in adopting Apple’s technology, with consumer interest remaining strong. This contradiction underscores the intricate relationship between technology, security, and politics in today’s international scenario.

Conclusion

In conclusion, even with ongoing security issues and prohibitions against using iPhones for official duties, the Russian government has significantly raised its acquisitions of iPhones in 2023. This increase coincides with allegations of espionage involving iPhones by the United States, a claim strongly denied by Apple. Meanwhile, the high demand for the newest iPhone models continues in Russia, supported by grey market imports, even as Apple ceases official exports to the nation amid geopolitical tensions.

Q&A: Addressing Key Queries

Q: What has driven the Russian government’s increased iPhone purchases despite security concerns?

A:

The rise in iPhone purchases likely stems from ongoing demand within government sectors and a scarcity of viable alternatives offering comparable functionality and user experience. Despite security issues, the popularity of iPhones can be attributed to their advanced features and dependability.

Q: What are parallel imports, and how do they influence iPhone availability in Russia?

A:

Parallel imports refer to products imported into a country without the brand owner’s consent, thus bypassing official channels. Russia has legalized this practice to ensure continued access to foreign goods like iPhones after Apple suspended direct exports. Consequently, Russian consumers can still acquire new Apple devices, although often at elevated prices.

Q: Has Apple addressed the espionage allegations made by the Russian government?

A:

Yes, Apple has firmly denied any involvement in espionage activities. The company maintains that its devices are secure and asserts it has not collaborated with any government to compromise user privacy. Nevertheless, the Russian government remains cautious regarding the use of Apple products for sensitive tasks.

Q: How does the prohibition on iPhones for government workers impact their usage in Russia?

A:

The prohibition mainly affects the use of iPhones and iPads for official communications and work tasks. Government officials are barred from utilizing these devices for work-related emails and applications, but the ban does not necessarily encompass personal use, which might clarify the continued growth in iPhone acquisitions.

Q: What are the primary security fears related to iPhones in Russia?

A:

The primary concern is the vulnerability of iPhones to espionage by foreign intelligence agencies, particularly those from Western nations. The Russian government worries that advanced surveillance software could be exploited to access sensitive information stored on these devices.

Q: Why do iPhones remain popular in Russia despite these fears?

A:

iPhones are celebrated for their intuitive interface, advanced functionalities, and reliability. Many users, including government officials, may struggle to transition to alternative devices lacking similar performance. Additionally, the status associated with Apple products likely plays a role in their ongoing allure.

Q: How has the conflict between Russia and Ukraine affected iPhone availability in Russia?

A:

The conflict prompted Apple to cease official exports to Russia, yet consumers have found ways to procure iPhones. Grey market imports have filled this void, allowing Russians to continue buying new iPhones, albeit typically at significantly higher prices as a result of the unofficial channels.

This article offers an in-depth analysis of the situation, formatted for the Australian audience and optimised for search engines. It features a “Quick Read” segment for easy takeaways, a detailed discussion of the issue, and a Q&A section that tackles common inquiries from readers.

Jabra Elite 4 Active Wireless Earbuds Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Jabra Elite 4 Active in-Ear Bluetooth Earbuds – True Wireless Ear Buds with Secure Active Fit, 4 Built-in Microphones, Active Noise Cancellation and Adjustable HearThrough Technology – Mint

Endeavour Energy Initiates Procurement Transformation through SAP Ariba Implementation


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Endeavour Energy Initiates Significant Procurement Revamp with SAP Ariba

Endeavour Energy, a prominent utility provider in Australia, has launched an extensive revamp of its procurement operations under the banner “Zodiac”. This shift is intended to enhance visibility and efficiency across the company’s spending at all levels. The core element of this advancement is the implementation of SAP Ariba, a cloud-based procurement solution that will support contract management, sourcing, and supplier lifecycle management.

Quick Overview:

  • Endeavour Energy begins a procurement overhaul project, codenamed Zodiac.
  • SAP Ariba will be utilized to improve contract management, sourcing, and supplier lifecycle management.
  • The Zodiac initiative aims to enhance demand planning and comprehension of enterprise-wide spending.
  • Western Sydney’s rapid development, including the forthcoming airport, necessitates improved procurement practices.
  • Endeavour Energy has previously adopted SAP S/4HANA and SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP).
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) will contribute to optimizing procurement efficiency.
  • Endeavour Energy has created its own internal AI chatbot, inspired by ChatGPT, to aid in procurement and other functions.

Reasons Behind Endeavour Energy’s Procurement Transformation

Endeavour Energy aims to modernise its procurement operations. The Zodiac initiative, spearheaded by procurement and supply chain manager Nicole Croak, seeks to refine contract management, sourcing, and supplier lifecycle management through SAP Ariba. Croak emphasized this crucial transition during the recent SAP NOW conference, highlighting how the utility company’s revamped procurement strategy is vital for ongoing growth and operational efficiency.

The primary service region for Endeavour Energy encompasses Western Sydney, which is witnessing rapid growth due to significant infrastructure ventures, such as the new Western Sydney International Airport. To accommodate this expansion, the company must effectively manage the supply of essential infrastructure components, such as poles and wires.

Improving Demand Planning for Growth Zones

The swift growth of Western Sydney is a focal concern for Endeavour Energy’s future planning. Croak detailed how the utility has already seen considerable efficiency improvements in demand planning over the past three years, although further progress is still needed. Currently, the company relies on data from its works management systems to back major projects, but the new Zodiac initiative will enhance these methods further within SAP’s framework.

“We need to understand what we’re purchasing, when it’s required, and from whom we’re sourcing it,” Croak stated, stressing the significance of refining procurement procedures to address the needs of its rapidly expanding service territories, including regions of southern Sydney and the south coast.

Utilizing SAP Solutions for Comprehensive Management

Endeavour Energy has already made substantial progress in digital transformation by deploying SAP S/4HANA between 2018 and 2021. This enterprise resource planning (ERP) system consolidates asset management, works management, finance, HR, payroll, procurement, warehousing, and distribution. The introduction of SAP Ariba will work to complement this by further simplifying procurement.

In addition, the company has embraced SAP’s Business Technology Platform (BTP), which provides data and analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), application development, automation, and integration capabilities. These technologies aim to establish a more unified system that connects Endeavour Energy’s diverse business functions.

Artificial Intelligence: The Upcoming Frontier in Procurement

Endeavour Energy is also delving into the potential of AI to boost procurement efficiency. Croak mentioned that the firm recently conducted an internal workshop focused on AI applications in procurement and spend management. The workshop generated several promising use cases that could revolutionize procurement decision-making.

One noteworthy advancement is the development of Endeavour Energy’s own internal AI chatbot, inspired by ChatGPT. This tool has been trained on company policies, procedures, and operational guidelines to assist both office and field employees with their inquiries. Croak is optimistic about the future potential of AI in procurement, envisioning a system capable of performing preliminary risk assessments and assessing supplier performance.

Conclusion

Endeavour Energy is embracing a digital transformation in procurement through the Zodiac initiative, aiming to modernise the management of spending, suppliers, and contracts. By leveraging SAP Ariba and the SAP Business Technology Platform, the utility plans to enhance its demand planning and procurement processes, particularly in rapidly growing areas like Western Sydney. The company’s investigation into AI, including an in-house chatbot, holds potential to further improve procurement efficiency and decision-making.

Q: What does the Zodiac initiative entail, and why is it necessary for Endeavour Energy?

A: The Zodiac initiative represents Endeavour Energy’s project for transforming procurement. Its goal is to enhance visibility into enterprise-wide spending and streamline processes such as contract management, sourcing, and supplier lifecycle management. Given the rapid growth in regions such as Western Sydney, the company must effectively manage and meet escalating infrastructure demands.

Q: How is SAP Ariba integrated into Endeavour Energy’s procurement strategy?

A: SAP Ariba is a cloud-based procurement solution that will play a key role in Endeavour Energy’s Zodiac initiative. It will help the utility in managing contracts, sourcing, and supplier relationships. By adopting SAP Ariba, the company aims to boost efficiency, minimize manual tasks, and enhance the overall procurement lifecycle.

Q: What significance does artificial intelligence hold in Endeavour Energy’s procurement overhaul?

A: Artificial intelligence is being investigated as a strategy to enhance procurement efficiency and decision-making. Endeavour Energy already has an AI-driven internal chatbot to support employees with inquiries regarding policies and procedures. The company is exploring ways AI can further facilitate procurement processes, including conducting risk analyses and assessing supplier performance.

Q: How has Endeavour Energy’s prior implementation of SAP solutions aided in preparing for this transformation?

A: From 2018 to 2021, Endeavour Energy implemented the SAP S/4HANA ERP system, incorporating crucial business functions like asset management, finance, and procurement. The company has also embraced SAP’s Business Technology Platform (BTP), which provides tools for data analytics, AI, and automation. These prior implementations have created a solid foundation for the Zodiac initiative, establishing a digital base for procurement enhancements.

Q: How does this transformation align with Endeavour Energy’s future growth objectives?

A: The transformation closely aligns with Endeavour Energy’s ambitions to support the rapid expansion of Western Sydney, especially with the new Western Sydney International Airport on the horizon. By refining procurement efficiency and demand planning, the utility will be more prepared to address the heightened infrastructure requirements in these flourishing areas.

Alt Image Tag: Endeavour Energy to deploy SAP Ariba, kicks off procurement transformation

“How Beyond Bank Improved Its Call Centre and Broadened Digital Functions”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Beyond Bank Revamps Call Centre Using Cloud and AI Technologies

Beyond Bank has markedly improved its call centre functions and digital reach, achieving a 92% boost in customer satisfaction. By embracing cutting-edge cloud solutions and artificial intelligence (AI), the bank has optimized workflows, shortened call durations, and enhanced the overall experience for customers.

At a Glance:

  • Customer satisfaction surged by 92% through digital advancements at Beyond Bank.
  • Utilized the Genesys Cloud platform, shortening call handling durations by 30 seconds.
  • Agent training duration was cut by 50%.
  • AI-driven predictive call routing decreased handling time by 13%.
  • Chatbot integration now manages 50% more customer interactions than prior systems.
  • Callback functionality allows customers to significantly lower their perceived waiting times.
  • Plans to enhance chatbot functionalities for secure self-service transactions are in development.

Transitioning to Genesys Cloud Platform

To upgrade operations and accommodate growing customer demands, Beyond Bank migrated from its outdated on-premise call centre system to the Genesys Cloud platform. As noted by Brent Alexander, the national manager of the bank’s call centre, the earlier system was not in sync with the institution’s customer-focused objectives. Transitioning to the cloud has not only boosted functionality but also led to considerable cost savings.

Beyond Bank enhances call centre with Genesys Cloud and AI

Cost-Efficient and Scalable Solution

The Genesys Cloud platform facilitates regular feature updates, which played a crucial role in Beyond Bank’s selection process. The capacity to introduce new features effortlessly with a simple button click, while avoiding extensive hardware or resource enhancements, rendered it a financially feasible alternative for the bank. Beyond Bank has been utilizing Genesys Cloud for six years and has recently renewed its contract until 2029.

Enhanced Customer Verification and Callback Features

A further key enhancement arose from the integration of the Genesys Cloud platform with Beyond Bank’s Dynamics CRM. This synchronization permits customers to partially finish the verification process using their phone passcode prior to engaging with an agent, leading to a reduction in handling time of around 40 seconds.

The rollout of a callback option has also enriched the customer experience. This function alerts customers regarding estimated wait durations and provides an automatic callback to maintain their position in the queue. Alexander remarked that customer comments concerning wait times “practically vanished overnight” following the implementation of this feature.

AI Technologies and Chatbot Integration

Beyond Bank has also adopted AI, especially in the form of chatbots and predictive call routing, to further enhance efficiency and customer satisfaction. The predictive routing technology evaluates available agents to identify the most suitable person for each call, leading to an average reduction in handling time of 13%.

The bank’s AI-enabled chatbot, designed in partnership with QPC Australia, has resulted in a 50% rise in the volume of customer inquiries managed through chat. Originally programmed to identify 17 distinct customer intents, the chatbot is operational 24/7, allowing customers to receive assistance anytime. The bank is dedicated to ensuring that the chatbot maintains the high-quality service standard set by its human agents.

Plans for Chatbot Enhancement

At present, the chatbot primarily addresses general inquiries, but Beyond Bank intends to broaden its capabilities to facilitate secure, self-service transactions. By developing the necessary integration layers, the bank seeks to enable customers to execute transactions via the web chat channel anytime, from the comfort of their homes.

Conclusion

Beyond Bank’s shift to a cloud-based call centre framework and the implementation of AI-driven solutions have resulted in remarkable upgrades in customer satisfaction, call processing durations, and operational productivity. The integration of callback features, predictive routing, and a round-the-clock chatbot has empowered the bank to better serve its customers, while forthcoming enhancements promise to introduce even more self-service conveniences.

Q&A

Q: Which platform did Beyond Bank adopt to improve its call centre operations?

A: Beyond Bank switched from a traditional on-premises system to the Genesys Cloud platform, which offers improved functionality, cost reductions, and ongoing feature enhancements.

Q: What has been the impact on customer satisfaction since the changes?

A: Customer satisfaction has increased by 92%, attributed to improvements like decreased call handling times and the addition of callback options.

Q: How does AI contribute to the enhancements at Beyond Bank’s call centre?

A: Beyond Bank has leveraged AI for predictive call routing, which reduces handling periods by 13%, and for a chatbot that now manages 50% more customer inquiries than previously.

Q: What are the future aspirations for Beyond Bank’s chatbot?

A: Beyond Bank aims to expand its chatbot’s capabilities to include secure, self-service transactions, enabling customers to conduct transactions via web chat at any time.

Q: How has the integration of the Genesys Cloud platform with Dynamics CRM benefited the bank?

A: The integration has optimized the customer verification procedure, decreasing call handling times by 40 seconds and overall enhancing the customer experience.

Q: What effect has the callback feature had on customer wait times?

A: The callback feature allows customers to receive a call back while maintaining their queue position, which has sharply decreased complaints regarding wait times.

Q: In what ways has the cloud platform enhanced Beyond Bank’s operational efficiency?

A: The Genesys Cloud platform has minimized hardware maintenance needs, halved training durations for agents, and enabled effortless deployment of new features, thus making the bank’s operations more efficient.

FBI Detains Alabama Individual for Compromising SEC’s Bitcoin Account


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

FBI Detains Alabama Individual for Breaching SEC’s Bitcoin Account

Quick Overview

  • Eric Council Jr., a 25-year-old resident of Alabama, was taken into custody for infiltrating the SEC’s X (previously Twitter) account.
  • The breach involved a SIM swap, resulting in a deceptive announcement that triggered a significant rise in Bitcoin prices.
  • Council allegedly collaborated with accomplices to access the SEC’s X account.
  • The incident caused a temporary surge of $1000 in Bitcoin’s price.
  • Council faces charges of conspiracy to commit aggravated identity theft and access device fraud.
  • This occurrence has raised alarm regarding the security of X (previously Twitter) under Elon Musk’s leadership.

Arrest of Alabama Individual Tied to SEC X Account Breach

An individual from Alabama, Eric Council Jr., has been apprehended by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for executing a plan that involved breaching the official X (formerly Twitter) account of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The hacking incident occurred earlier this year and reportedly sought to influence Bitcoin pricing by disseminating false information. The 25-year-old has been charged by US prosecutors with conspiracy related to aggravated identity theft and access device fraud.

This arrest has triggered renewed worries about the security of X, particularly following its acquisition by Elon Musk in October 2022. Below, we summarize the critical elements of the case and its broader effects on cryptocurrency markets and cybersecurity on social media platforms.

The Breach: Overview of Events

In January, the breach resulted in a fake announcement being made on the SEC’s official X account, misleadingly claiming the agency had approved Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). This inaccurate information led to a brief surge of $1000 AUD ($1493 USD) in Bitcoin prices. The post was swiftly taken down, and the SEC formally rejected the information.

According to the US Attorney’s office for the District of Columbia, Council was allegedly involved in a SIM swapping breach, a method that enables hackers to seize control of a target’s mobile phone by transferring the SIM card to a different phone. The hackers identified a target, known as “C.L.,” who had access to the SEC’s X account. Council was guided by his accomplices on executing the SIM swap, ultimately enabling them to take over the account and disseminate false information.

Manipulation of Bitcoin Prices

The fraudulent announcement on the SEC’s X account had a direct effect on Bitcoin’s price. As previously mentioned, the cryptocurrency experienced a significant $1000 USD ($1493 AUD) increase shortly after the fake ETF approval news was publicized. Although the spike was fleeting, it underscored the volatility of cryptocurrency markets and their vulnerability to misinformation.

Notably, the day following the breach, the SEC officially approved Bitcoin ETFs, further integrating the cryptocurrency into mainstream investment portfolios. While these ETFs are viewed as beneficial for the legitimacy of Bitcoin, the breach highlighted the inherent risks associated with digital currencies and the platforms that share market-related information.

Issues Surrounding X’s Security

This incident has led to increased scrutiny over the security of X, especially in light of its acquisition by billionaire Elon Musk in late 2022. Under Musk’s stewardship, X has seen major transformations, including layoffs impacting its moderation and security teams, raising questions about whether the platform is sufficiently secure.

The breach of the SEC’s X account is not an isolated case; numerous prominent accounts, including those of celebrities and corporations, have experienced compromises in the past. This recent breach exemplifies the continuous security obstacles that platforms like X encounter, particularly in safeguarding sensitive accounts belonging to governmental bodies and financial regulators.

What is the Fate of Eric Council Jr.?

After the breach, Council received payments in Bitcoin for his involvement in the SIM swap. Prosecutors allege that he later journeyed to Birmingham, Alabama, to return the iPhone used during the hack. Additionally, Council reportedly made online searches for terms such as “what are indicators that the FBI is pursuing you” and sought guidance on deleting accounts from encrypted messaging services like Telegram.

Council has been charged with conspiracy to commit aggravated identity theft and access device fraud. Currently, there has been no statement from Council’s legal representatives, and the SEC has refrained from commenting on the arrest.

The Consequences

The SEC’s prompt action in removing the false post and renouncing the information certainly helped in reducing the fallout. However, this event is likely to leave lasting effects on public perception regarding cryptocurrency markets and the SEC’s capacity to uphold order within an ever-evolving financial environment.

Moreover, this case serves as a stark reminder that, although the world of cryptocurrency is becoming increasingly mainstream, it remains fraught with risks. Whether arising from market manipulation, cyber intrusions, or misinformation, the dangers posed by digital currencies are ever-present.

Overview

Eric Council Jr. from Alabama was detained for his involvement in a scheme to hack the SEC’s X account with the intent of manipulating Bitcoin prices. This incident, which occurred in January, resulted in a temporary rise in Bitcoin’s worth following a fraudulent claim posted on X regarding the SEC’s approval of Bitcoin ETFs. This breach has heightened concerns over X’s security, particularly since Elon Musk assumed control of the platform. Council has been charged with conspiracy to commit aggravated identity theft and access device fraud.

Q&A

Q: What exactly is a SIM swap, and how was it utilized in this breach?

A:

A SIM swap is a method employed by hackers to shift control over a victim’s mobile number to a new device by changing out the SIM card. In this situation, the hackers utilized the SIM swap to access a victim’s phone, allowing them to seize control of the SEC’s X account and post misleading information.

Q: How did the breach affect Bitcoin prices?

A:

The false announcement on the SEC’s X account suggested that Bitcoin ETFs had been approved, leading to a temporary surge of $1000 USD ($1493 AUD) in Bitcoin’s price. This price rise occurred due to the perceived credibility of the ETF approval.

Q: Why has this event sparked concerns about X’s security?

A:

The breach has highlighted the_security protocols at X, especially since the platform has undergone major changes under Elon Musk’s leadership. With reports of layoffs impacting moderation and security teams, concerns have arisen regarding X’s ability to safeguard prominent accounts from cyber threats.

Q: What allegations does Eric Council Jr. face?

A:

Council faces charges of conspiracy to commit aggravated identity theft and access device fraud. These allegations stem from his role in the SIM swapping breach that compromised the SEC’s X account.

Q: What is the importance of Bitcoin ETFs?

A:

Bitcoin ETFs provide investors with a means to engage with Bitcoin through the stock market without making direct purchases of the cryptocurrency. The acceptance of Bitcoin ETFs is perceived as a move toward legitimizing Bitcoin as a recognized financial asset.

Q: How did the SEC respond to the breach?

A:

The SEC swiftly removed the false post and issued a statement to disavow the misleading information. Their quick response helped to reduce the adverse effects caused by the breach.

Q: What measures can be implemented to enhance the security of social media accounts?

A:

To bolster security, users managing high-profile accounts should activate two-factor authentication (2FA), use robust passwords, and consistently update their security configurations. Furthermore, platforms like X need to invest in advanced security solutions to thwart similar breaches in the future.

“EU AI Act Examination Reveals Compliance Difficulties for Major Tech”


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

EU AI Act: Major Tech Companies Confront Compliance Obstacles

The recent EU AI Act is exerting pressure on some of the leading artificial intelligence frameworks globally, exposing significant vulnerabilities in areas like cybersecurity and biased outputs. As the regulations of the Act begin to take effect, a novel instrument created by LatticeFlow AI is highlighting where firms like Meta, OpenAI, and others may be lacking.

Quick Read

  • The EU AI Act enforces rigorous compliance requirements for AI systems, with emphasis on cybersecurity and bias.
  • LatticeFlow AI’s LLM Checker evaluates AI systems from entities such as OpenAI, Meta, and Alibaba.
  • Non-compliance could lead to fines reaching €35 million or 7% of global revenue.
  • AI from OpenAI, Meta, and Alibaba display shortcomings in critical domains like biased output and cybersecurity.
  • Anthropic’s Claude 3 Opus rates highest on compliance, whereas other models perform less favorably.
  • Complete compliance enforcement measures are scheduled to be in place by 2025.

Overview of the EU AI Act

With artificial intelligence (AI) progressively becoming part of daily life, the European Union has proactively introduced the EU AI Act. This legislation aims to impose strict regulations on artificial intelligence systems, particularly those identified as “general-purpose” AIs (GPAI), which encompasses tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

The AI Act is slated to be fully operational over the next two years, with requirements to ensure that AI systems are competent, secure, and devoid of bias. Companies that do not meet these regulations could face substantial fines of up to €35 million (A$56.6 million) or 7% of their global annual revenue.

Evaluating AI Models for Compliance

A new instrument crafted by Swiss startup LatticeFlow AI, in partnership with ETH Zurich and Bulgaria’s INSAIT, seeks to assist major tech firms in assessing their AI models’ adherence to the AI Act. The instrument, referred to as the “Large Language Model (LLM) Checker,” analyzes AI models across various criteria, including technical robustness, safety, cybersecurity resilience, and bias detection.

The LLM Checker awards a score between 0 and 1 in each category, providing insights into potential deficiencies. Scores over 0.75 signify a solid level of compliance; however, numerous leading models have garnered lower ratings in critical areas.

AI Act reveals compliance issues for technology firms

Shortcomings Among Major Tech Firms

While the LLM Checker indicates a generally optimistic performance for certain models, notable weaknesses have been pinpointed in essential areas. For example, OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 Turbo received a score of only 0.46 for discriminatory output, raising ongoing concerns about AI model bias. Alibaba Cloud’s “Qwen1.5 72B Chat” didn’t perform better, with a score of 0.37 in the same category.

Concerns regarding cybersecurity resilience are also present. Meta’s “Llama 2 13B Chat” scored a mere 0.42 for “prompt hijacking,” a cyber threat capable of coercing AI systems into revealing sensitive data. Similarly, French startup Mistral’s “8x7B Instruct” model scored low at 0.38.

Top Performers and Improvement Areas

Among the evaluated models, Anthropic’s “Claude 3 Opus” distinguished itself as the highest achiever, securing an impressive score of 0.89 overall. This serves as a strong indication that models can attain high compliance rates with appropriate attention and resources.

Nonetheless, the varied results underscore the difficulties that major tech players confront in aligning their models with the demanding standards of the AI Act. Companies that do not rectify these issues could face severe repercussions as the EU prepares for thorough enforcement of the Act by 2025.

Strategies for Full Compliance

As the timeline toward complete enforcement of the AI Act approaches, firms are encouraged to utilize tools like the LLM Checker to pinpoint and rectify gaps in their AI models. LatticeFlow CEO Petar Tsankov conveyed optimism for the future, noting that the findings offer firms a clear path to ensure compliance.

“The EU is still finalizing all compliance benchmarks, but we can already detect gaps in the models,” remarked Tsankov. “With enhanced focus on compliance optimization, we trust that model providers can be adequately equipped to satisfy regulatory demands.”

Conclusion

The EU AI Act is poised to reshape the compliance landscape for artificial intelligence, particularly concerning generative models such as ChatGPT. Initial assessments by LatticeFlow’s LLM Checker indicate that while certain AI models are performing commendably, others struggle significantly in critical areas like bias and cybersecurity. With the looming threat of substantial financial penalties, major tech firms must prioritize compliance to avoid contravening the newly implemented regulations.

Q: What is the EU AI Act?

A:

The EU AI Act is an extensive series of regulations designed to guarantee the safety, equity, and transparency of artificial intelligence systems. It places particular emphasis on general-purpose AI models, including those utilized for natural language processing (e.g., ChatGPT). The Act requires that AI systems fulfill specific standards related to cybersecurity, bias prevention, and technical robustness.

Q: What is the LLM Checker tool?

A:

The LLM Checker is a tool created by LatticeFlow AI in partnership with research institutions ETH Zurich and INSAIT. It assesses AI models across a variety of categories, such as safety, cybersecurity, and bias detection. The tool provides a score ranging from 0 to 1, assisting firms in identifying areas where their AI systems may not adhere to the EU AI Act.

Q: What consequences do companies face for non-compliance?

A:

Companies that neglect compliance with the EU AI Act may incur fines of up to €35 million (A$56.6 million) or 7% of their global annual turnover. Given the significant stakes, ensuring compliance is critical for any organization developing or employing AI models within Europe.

Q: What primary compliance challenges have been identified thus far?

A:

The LLM Checker has pinpointed numerous significant compliance challenges, including bias in AI models and susceptibility to cyber threats like “prompt hijacking.” For instance, OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 Turbo received a poor rating for discriminatory output, while Meta’s Llama 2 showed weaknesses in cybersecurity resilience.

Q: How can companies prepare for the AI Act?

A:

Organizations can leverage tools like the LLM Checker to evaluate their AI models and identify weaknesses in aspects such as bias and cybersecurity. By proactively addressing these concerns, businesses can ensure they comply with the standards outlined in the AI Act and avert notable fines.

Q: When will the EU AI Act be fully enforced?

A:

The EU AI Act will be implemented in phases, with full enforcement anticipated by 2025. Meanwhile, the EU is developing a code of practice for generative AI models, which will serve as a compliance benchmark.