“Australian States Intensify Action Against DeepSeek with Expanding Prohibitions”
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
Brief Overview
- Queensland and Western Australia have prohibited DeepSeek on government devices.
- The prohibitions are in response to a federal directive expressing national security worries regarding the AI app created in China.
- DeepSeek usage has also been limited in New South Wales and South Australia.
- Other regions, including Tasmania, are currently examining their position.
- Concerns over DeepSeek’s origins and data management are major security issues.
- Large language AI models like ChatGPT remain unaffected by these prohibitions.
States in Australia Take Steps to Limit DeepSeek Due to Security Issues
Queensland and Western Australia Align with Federal Restrictions
Queensland and Western Australia have joined the ranks of Australian states banning DeepSeek, an AI application developed in China, from use on government devices. This move is in accordance with a directive from the federal government prohibiting public servants from using DeepSeek over national security concerns.
The Queensland government has officially banned the application on all government-supplied ICT services, which includes smartphones, laptops, tablets, and desktops. Agencies are tasked with uninstalling existing software and ensuring no future access through fleet management and internet filtering measures.
Western Australia’s Office of Digital Government has similarly instituted a cybersecurity directive to block DeepSeek from all government devices, in line with recommendations from the Department of Home Affairs.
New South Wales and South Australia Quick to Enforce the Ban
New South Wales has taken the lead as the first state to impose restrictions on DeepSeek, highlighting worries about emerging technologies and their potential risks. Following this, South Australia has also enacted measures to restrict access within government networks and has instructed public servants to remove the software from their devices.
What Concerns Do Australian Authorities Have About DeepSeek?
DeepSeek, particularly its AI assistant and DeepSeek-V3 model, has attracted global attention since its launch. However, its Chinese origins and data collection practices have raised alarms among Australian officials.
The primary concern revolves around the potential dangers linked to foreign-developed AI applications, such as data privacy issues, security weaknesses, and risks of foreign surveillance. These apprehensions have led both state and federal governments to adopt proactive measures.
Some Australian States Still Evaluating Their Position
While a number of states have promptly banned DeepSeek, others are in the process of reviewing their positions. Tasmania, for instance, has indicated it is analyzing security guidance prior to reaching a conclusive decision. Minister for Innovation, Science, and the Digital Economy Madeleine Ogilvie confirmed that any integration of AI software in Tasmania will adhere to a risk-based approach as detailed in its protective security policy framework.
Victoria, the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), and the Northern Territory have not yet released any formal bans on DeepSeek.
ChatGPT and Similar AI Models Not Impacted
Interestingly, the restrictions placed on DeepSeek do not apply to other large-language AI models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT. This indicates that Australian officials are specifically wary of DeepSeek’s data practices and its connections to China, rather than AI technology as a whole.
Conclusion
An increasing number of Australian states are banning DeepSeek from government devices due to national security issues. Queensland and Western Australia are the latest to implement these restrictions, following New South Wales and South Australia. The concerns regarding DeepSeek are centered on its origins in China and its data collection practices, which governments fear may present cybersecurity hazards. Meanwhile, states like Tasmania are still deciding on their approach, while AI models like ChatGPT remain unaffected.
Questions and Answers
Q: What is the reason for the DeepSeek bans in various Australian states?
A:
DeepSeek is banned due to worries about its Chinese origins and data collection policies that could potentially pose cybersecurity threats. Australian governments are implementing precautionary actions to safeguard sensitive data.
Q: Which states in Australia have implemented bans on DeepSeek?
A:
Queensland, Western Australia, New South Wales, and South Australia have enacted bans on DeepSeek across government devices, while a few states, like Tasmania, are still reviewing their positions.
Q: Is DeepSeek restricted for general public use within Australia?
A:
No, the current bans apply solely to government devices and networks. The public retains access to and can utilize DeepSeek.
Q: How do DeepSeek and ChatGPT differ?
A:
Both DeepSeek and ChatGPT are AI-driven language models, but DeepSeek has raised concerns because of its Chinese development and data collection practices. ChatGPT, created by OpenAI in the United States, isn’t subject to the same restrictions.
Q: Could other Australian states impose bans on DeepSeek in the future?
A:
It is a possibility. Some regions, including Tasmania, are carefully considering security concerns prior to making final decisions.
Q: Are businesses in Australia permitted to use DeepSeek?
A:
Yes, private companies and individuals are allowed to use DeepSeek unless further specific restrictions are enacted.
Q: How are Australian authorities enforcing the ban on DeepSeek?
A:
Governments are employing fleet management tools and internet filtering systems to block the access, installation, and use of DeepSeek on devices provided by the government.
Q: Might other AI applications face similar restrictions?
A:
That depends on security evaluations. Should an AI application be assessed as a risk to national security, it may encounter similar limitations in the future.