Category: Australia Tech News

Quick Overview

• BMW Australia’s Melbourne headquarters now boasts 1,109 solar panels, increasing its solar energy output to 500kW by four times.
• The solar installation generates 600 megawatt-hours (MWh) every year, accounting for twice the EVs compared to last year.
• Currently, 44% of BMW Australia’s fleet comprises fully electric vehicles (BEVs), marking a 33% rise since December 2023.
• Sales of BMW BEVs soared by 163% year-on-year, resulting in over 7,000 registrations in 2024.
• MINI BEV registrations have almost doubled within the same period.
• The company has implemented eco-conscious policies, such as banning single-use plastics and minimizing emissions using plant-based materials.
• BMW dealerships throughout the country are integrating solar panels, water recycling, and EV charging systems.
• The BMW Group is focused on reducing CO2 emissions per vehicle by 40% by 2030 as part of its sustainability framework.

Solar Energy: Empowering BMW Australia’s Headquarters

BMW Group Australia has notably enhanced its sustainability initiatives by expanding its solar panel installation atop its Melbourne headquarters. The total number of panels rose from 200 to 1,109, resulting in a fourfold increase in solar power generation. This modernized system now generates 500kW of power, capable of producing 600 megawatt-hours (MWh) each year. The solar energy produced is adequate to completely power the company’s expanding fleet of electric vehicles (EVs) on-site.

Electric Vehicles Transform Fleet Composition

The shift towards electric mobility at BMW Australia has reached unprecedented levels, with 44% of its fleet now made up of fully electric vehicles (BEVs). This signifies a remarkable 33% increase since December 2023. The company’s dedication to EV integration reflects customer demand, with BEVs accounting for 29% of BMW’s overall sales. In just 2024, over 7,000 BMW BEVs have been registered, indicating a year-on-year increase of 163%.

MINI, a subsidiary of BMW Group, has also experienced a significant rise in EV adoption, with BEV registrations nearly doubling by November 2024. This shows a rising demand for sustainable transportation across BMW’s offerings.

Eco-Friendly Practices at Headquarters

In addition to renewable energy and EV integration, BMW Australia has implemented crucial measures to minimize waste and lower its carbon footprint. At its Melbourne headquarters, the company bistro has replaced single-use takeaway cups with reusable options. Furthermore, plant-based water bottles, which mitigate carbon emissions by 74%, along with glass alternatives for other beverages have been introduced.

These measures reflect BMW Group’s global initiative of “Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle,” showcasing the company’s pledge to sustainability at all operational levels.

Dealership Partners Embrace Sustainability

The sustainability initiatives of BMW Australia extend well beyond its headquarters, with dealer partners nationwide playing an integral role. Numerous dealerships are now equipped with rooftop solar arrays, water recycling technologies, and EV charging points to cater to customer demands and enhance operational energy efficiency. Additionally, general waste recycling programs have been widely embraced.

BMW’s Global Sustainability Objectives

BMW Group strives to lower CO2 emissions per vehicle by at least 40% over its entire lifecycle by the year 2030 relative to 2019 benchmarks. This ambitious plan encompasses emissions from production, the supply chain, and end-user usage. The advancements observed at BMW Australia underscore the company’s commitment to these international goals, highlighting efforts to forge a sustainable future for mobility.

Conclusion

BMW Group Australia has made significant strides in its sustainability mission by considerably amplifying its solar panel capacity, transitioning almost half of its fleet to electric vehicles, and embedding eco-friendly practices at both its headquarters and dealerships. These initiatives form part of BMW’s overarching global objective to decrease carbon emissions and foster renewable energy. With a remarkable increase in BEV sales and the implementation of sustainable practices, BMW Australia is setting a benchmark in the automotive sector.

FAQs: Answers to Your Questions

Q: What is the annual energy production of BMW Australia’s solar panels?

A: The upgraded solar panel system generates 600 megawatt-hours (MWh) each year, sufficient to completely power the company’s on-site EVs.

Q: What proportion of BMW Australia’s fleet consists of electric vehicles?

A: At present, 44% of BMW Australia’s fleet is made up of fully electric vehicles (BEVs), reflecting a 33% growth since December 2023.

Q: How have BEV sales for BMW and MINI performed in 2024?

A: BMW BEV registrations have surged by 163% year-on-year, exceeding 7,000 units. Meanwhile, MINI has nearly doubled its BEV registrations by November 2024.

Q: What sustainability measures are implemented at BMW Australia’s headquarters?

A: The headquarters has eliminated single-use plastics, introduced plant-based water bottles, and transitioned to glass alternatives for beverages to reduce waste and lower carbon emissions.

Q: Are BMW dealerships in Australia adopting eco-friendly practices?

A: Yes, dealerships are integrating rooftop solar, water recycling systems, EV charging facilities, and recycling initiatives for general waste to promote sustainability.

Q: What are the global sustainability targets of BMW Group?

A: BMW Group’s goal is to lower CO2 emissions per vehicle by 40% across its lifecycle by the year 2030 compared to 2019 levels.

Quick Overview

• A motel in Rockhampton has introduced a prohibition on EV charging, citing risks of fire.
• This decision is a reaction to an electrical malfunction linked to EV charging at a different property owned by the motel’s proprietor.
• Experts contend that the issues likely stem from outdated electrical systems instead of the EVs themselves.
• Data reveals that EVs have a much lower probability of fire compared to internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles.
• Other lodging options in Rockhampton do provide EV charging services, including Motel 98 and the Tesla Supercharger at Primewest.
• This ban underscores persistent misconceptions surrounding EV safety and its potential consequences on EV uptake in Australia.

Analyzing the Rationale: Why Prohibit EV Charging?

The Rocky Gardens Motor Inn, located in Rockhampton, Queensland, has drawn attention with a notice stating,
“Charging of Electric Vehicles is not allowed due to fire risk.” This choice was reportedly made following an incident
at another property owned by the motel’s proprietor, where an electrical circuit failed during EV charging. The impacted
property has been in operation for over 30 years, raising doubts about whether the real issue was the aging electrical system
rather than the EV itself.

The proprietor and manager have voiced negative views towards EVs, which might have swayed their decision. Even though EV chargers
generally consume power comparable to household appliances like microwaves, the owner remains steadfast in his view that EVs carry fire risks.

What Does the Evidence Indicate About EV Fire Risks?

Contrary to the motel’s assertions, evidence suggests that EVs are considerably less likely to ignite than internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles.
According to NRMA
and EV FireSafe, an Australian initiative supported by the Department of Defence, only six EV battery fires have been recorded in Australia
among over 180,000 EVs on the road. Worldwide, the likelihood of a passenger EV battery catching fire is 0.0012%, compared to 0.1% for ICE vehicles.

Most EVs sold in Australia are equipped with safety features designed to prevent overcharging. Fires are more likely to result from accidents
that physically damage the battery pack rather than through regular charging. Experts recommend utilizing certified chargers and steering clear of inexpensive, non-compliant alternatives to further reduce risks.

The Larger Problem: Misinformation and Its Effects

The Rocky Gardens Motor Inn’s decision to forbid EV charging raises alarms about the dissemination of misleading information. Posting a notice without
adequate context can perpetuate misunderstandings regarding EV safety. Guests who see the sign might wrongly link EVs to fire dangers, possibly discouraging them from considering EV ownership in the future.

The motel has not made this policy known on its website, leaving EV drivers uninformed until they arrive. Clarity in such policies is essential
for enabling EV owners to make educated choices regarding their lodging.

Available EV Charging Alternatives in Rockhampton

For those passing through Rockhampton with an EV, multiple alternative charging options exist:

• Motel 98: Provides charging facilities for guests. More details can be found on PlugShare.
• Stockland Shopping Centre: Features underground EV charging stations. Information is accessible on PlugShare.
• Tesla Supercharger at Primewest: Situated on the Bruce Highway, this station is available to non-Tesla vehicles as well. Visit PlugShare for further details.
• Other Locations: Rockhampton Council, the University of Queensland, and Rockhampton Hospital also provide EV charging facilities.

Conclusion

The Rocky Gardens Motor Inn’s decision to prohibit EV charging highlights a broader issue in addressing aging infrastructure
and countering misinformation regarding EV safety. While the fire risk tied to EVs is statistically insignificant, such policies
can erode public trust in EV adoption. Travelers with EVs have a variety of alternate charging options in Rockhampton, ensuring
they are not left stranded due to such prohibitions.

Q&A Section

Q: Why did the Rocky Gardens Motor Inn prohibit EV charging?

A:

This decision was based on an electrical problem that arose at another property owned by the motel’s proprietor. The incident, which involved
a circuit breaker, was connected to EV charging. However, experts recommend that the true issue may stem from outdated electrical infrastructure rather than the EV itself.

Q: Are EVs more susceptible to fires than petrol or diesel vehicles?

A:

No, data indicates that EVs are considerably less prone to catch fire compared to internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. Globally,
the chance of an EV battery fire is 0.0012%, while for ICE vehicles it is 0.1%.

Q: What charging solutions are provided in Rockhampton?

A:

EV owners can charge at locations such as Motel 98, Stockland Shopping Centre, the Tesla Supercharger at Primewest, and additional sites
operated by local councils, universities, and hospitals.

Q: Is it safe to charge an EV at older properties?

A:

Charging an EV at older establishments can be safe if the electrical infrastructure is properly maintained. However, aging wiring and inadequate power capacity
may pose hazards. It is recommended to use certified chargers and speak with property owners about the suitability of their infrastructure.

Q: How can misinformation concerning EVs be addressed?

A:

Education and transparency are essential. Providing accurate information about EV safety and clarifying misconceptions can enhance public trust.
Businesses should also convey policies clearly to avoid confusion and support informed decision-making.

Brief Overview

• Western Power transitions from project-oriented to product-centric IT operations.
• Launched “evergreen” product teams aligned with distinct business objectives.
• New funding framework utilizes “investment cases” for expedited decision processes.
• Vendor collaborations are evolving to incorporate specialists into internal teams.
• Technology is crucial for adapting to a dual-sided energy market and decarbonisation goals.

Transitioning to Product-Centric Operations

Western Power has re-engineered its IT operational framework to more effectively align with business priorities, making the shift from a project-centric to a product-centric approach. Tracy Deveugle-Frink, Head of Digital Products at Western Power, stated that this transition allows IT teams to cultivate deeper “business intimacy” and enhance collaboration. The change commenced with the formation of “evergreen” product teams that cater to various organizational functions, including asset management, customer services, corporate functions, and operational needs.

These product teams collaborate closely with their respective business units, guaranteeing mutual responsibility and shared ownership of results. “We are both jointly accountable, because the business can’t execute without us, and we can’t execute without the business,” Deveugle-Frink remarked.

Forging Strategic Vendor Collaborations

Western Power’s IT revamp also encompasses its vendor relationships. Once dependent on fixed-price outsourcing, the company now emphasizes “capability augmentation.” This approach integrates external experts, like developers or change managers, into the internal product team structure. The subsequent phase will focus on scaling this model to acquire complete service capabilities instead of individual roles.

This integration promotes seamless collaboration and ensures that external partners align with Western Power’s corporate objectives.

Innovative Funding Approaches for Agile Teams

One challenge Western Power encountered was reconciling funding models with the rapid pace of its agile product teams. The answer? A versatile “investment case” framework. This strategy allows teams to propose technology initiatives by clearly outlining funding requirements, anticipated results, and measurable success indicators. The finance and technology departments now collaborate closely to guarantee timely funding and tangible outcomes.

Through this framework, Western Power has simplified the resource allocation process for critical projects, facilitating quicker execution and enhanced accountability.

Navigating a Changing Energy Environment

Western Power functions within a dynamic energy marketplace, where the emergence of dual-sided energy systems has added new layers of complexity to grid management. The organization has heavily relied on technology to tackle these challenges, deploying advanced systems to monitor and maintain grid safety.

Moreover, regulatory pressures and decarbonisation objectives have intensified the necessity for innovative technological solutions. “Managing grids has become significantly more complex, and the technology required to oversee their safety has escalated tremendously,” remarked Deveugle-Frink.

Conclusion

Western Power’s IT transformation highlights the significance of aligning technology with business goals. By embracing a product-centric model, developing vendor partnerships, and implementing agile funding structures, the organization is better prepared to handle the intricacies of the contemporary energy market. As Western Power progresses on its journey, its forward-thinking approach offers a framework for other utilities aspiring to integrate IT more strategically within their operations.

Q&A: Frequently Asked Questions About Western Power’s IT Initiative

Q: What does the “evergreen” product team model entail?

A:

The “evergreen” product team model consists of dedicated technologist teams concentrating on specific business domains, such as asset management or operations. These teams consistently work to achieve outcomes, promoting deep collaboration and collective accountability with the business sectors they support.

Q: How is the “investment case” funding model structured?

A:

The “investment case” funding model empowers teams to pitch technology initiatives by presenting a comprehensive plan delineating funding needs, desired impacts, and performance metrics. This structure enables quicker decision-making and better alignment with organizational objectives.

Q: How are vendor relationships changing at Western Power?

A:

Western Power has moved away from conventional fixed-price outsourcing towards a capability augmentation strategy. External specialists are now incorporated into internal teams, ensuring alignment with corporate objectives and enhancing collaboration. Future plans include scaling this model to acquire comprehensive service capabilities.

Q: What obstacles is Western Power addressing with its updated IT approach?

A:

Western Power is addressing challenges such as the intricacies of a dual-sided energy market, stricter regulations, and decarbonisation targets. Its IT strategy utilizes advanced technologies to monitor grid safety and support these overarching goals.

Q: How long did it take to put the product-centric IT model into action?

A:

The initial rollout of the product-centric IT model, known as the “MVP” (minimum viable product), took roughly 18 months. Since then, the model has undergone refinements and expansions.

Quick Overview: Important Points

• Australia is enacting regulations that mandate tech leaders such as Meta and Google to compensate for news content distributed on their platforms.
• This regulation targets platforms with annual revenue generated in Australia exceeding $250 million.
• Non-compliance may result in substantial fines for companies.
• Tech firms can mitigate these penalties through voluntary commercial agreements with news publishers.
• Australia seeks to establish a global benchmark for Big Tech regulation and bolster local journalism.
• Meta and Google have voiced opposition to the proposal, highlighting potential threats to the viability of their platforms.
• News organizations like News Corp are poised to gain significantly from these new regulations.

Australia Clamps Down on Tech Giants

Taking a major step to reinforce local journalism, Australia is adopting regulations that require tech giants such as Meta and Google to provide compensation to media businesses for news content available on their platforms. This initiative seeks to rectify the disparity in revenue distribution between digital platforms and news organizations.

Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services Stephen Jones revealed that the regulations would foster a “financial incentive for agreement-making” between tech companies and news publishers. Platforms with revenue sourced from Australia exceeding $250 million yearly will need to comply to avoid hefty fines.

Tech Firms Resist

The proposed regulations have drawn backlash from tech companies. Meta contended that the majority of users do not engage with their platforms mainly for news and that news publishers willingly share content due to the benefits of increased exposure. Google similarly raised concerns, arguing the regulations could threaten the sustainability of existing commercial relationships with publishers.

Nevertheless, the Australian government remains resolute in its objective to regulate Big Tech and assure appropriate remuneration for local media entities.

A History of Tensions Between Big Tech and Australia

Australia has taken the lead in regulating tech giants. In 2021, the nation established laws requiring Google and Meta to reimburse media companies for news links that drive traffic and generate revenue. In response, Meta temporarily blocked news articles on its platforms but later formed agreements with multiple Australian publishers, including News Corp and the ABC.

However, Meta has now declared it will not extend these agreements beyond 2024 and has globally decreased its emphasis on news and political content promotion. Such actions have also occurred in Canada and various other nations, underscoring rising tensions between governments and tech entities.

Effects on Australian Media and Beyond

Australian news organizations, such as Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, are anticipated to gain considerable advantages from the new regulations. News Corp Australia executive chairman Michael Miller has already indicated a desire to negotiate commercial agreements with platforms like Meta and TikTok.

These regulations are not solely about financial gain; they also set a worldwide standard for how countries can hold tech giants accountable. Australia’s methodology may encourage other nations to implement similar actions, creating a ripple effect throughout the digital economy.

Conclusion

Australia’s new regulations signify a decisive action to tackle the power disparity between Big Tech and local media. By mandating that platforms like Meta and Google pay news publishers, the government intends to sustain Australian journalism while establishing a global benchmark for digital platform regulation. While tech giants have expressed their concerns, this move has generally been embraced by media organizations as a triumph for equitable revenue distribution.

Questions & Answers: Clarifying Your Queries

Q: Which companies will be impacted by these new regulations?

A:

The regulations affect significant social media platforms and search engines with Australian revenues over $250 million a year. This includes companies like Meta (Facebook, Instagram, Threads) and Google. However, platforms like X (formerly Twitter) are not encompassed by these regulations.

Q: How will compliance be tracked?

A:

Tech companies may offset the fees through voluntary commercial agreements with Australian news publishers. Non-compliance could lead to considerable financial penalties.

Q: What has been the reaction from tech giant?

A:

Meta and Google have criticized the proposal, arguing that it may affect the viability and sustainability of their platforms. Meta has also indicated that news links presently constitute a minimal share of users’ feeds.

Q: What will be the ramifications for Australian media companies?

A:

Australian media institutions, like News Corp and ABC, are expected to see substantial benefits from increased revenue due to these agreements. This is viewed as progress in endorsing local journalism.

Q: Could this lead other nations to implement similar legislation?

A:

Indeed, Australia’s forward-thinking approach may motivate other countries to enact analogous regulations, thus establishing a standard for holding tech giants responsible on a global scale.

Q: What are the next steps?

A:

The Australian government will move forward with the implementation of the new laws and oversee compliance. Discussions between tech platforms and media organizations are expected to escalate as the regulations come into force.

Brief Overview

• Over 99% of international data is transmitted through submarine cables, which are fundamental to global communication and economies.
• The United Nations’ International Telecommunication Union (ITU) has established a new committee to bolster cable resilience.
• In 2023, 200 cable outages were documented due to natural disasters, accidents, and suspected sabotage.
• Impaired cables can cut off entire areas, as demonstrated by Tonga’s internet blackout lasting a month in 2022.
• This new advisory committee comprises 40 specialists from the telecommunications, governmental, and private domains.
• A subsequent summit is planned in Nigeria for February to further these initiatives.

Importance of Submarine Cables

Submarine cables serve as the hidden foundation of the internet, facilitating everything from emails and streaming services to international financial exchanges. Carrying more than 99% of global data, they represent critical infrastructure for authorities, enterprises, and individuals across the globe. Any disruption to this network can have extensive consequences for both economies and communities.

Risks Facing Submarine Cables

Submarine cables encounter numerous threats, including natural disasters such as tsunamis, human errors like fishing or anchoring incidents, and intentional sabotage. In November, two cables were damaged in the Baltic Sea, emphasizing the fragility of these networks. ITU statistics show that around 80% of cable interruptions stem from accidents or natural events, while the remaining cases raise alarms about potential security risks.

The UN’s Newly Formed Advisory Committee

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a specialized agency of the UN, has initiated the International Advisory Body for Submarine Cable Resilience. This team consists of 40 international specialists from both public and private sectors and aims to enhance the resilience of submarine cables through better design, installation, and maintenance practices. Additionally, the committee will work to speed up the repair process by simplifying permits and protocols.

Handling Interruptions and Future Conferences

While the ITU does not probe into sabotage, the establishment of this advisory committee highlights the critical nature of addressing various disruptions. By ensuring quicker repairs and enhancing resilience, the group aspires to alleviate the effects of incidents on global communication. The upcoming discussions will be held at a conference in Nigeria in February, where experts will hone strategies to protect this essential infrastructure.

Consequences for Remote Areas

The repercussions of cable damage are particularly detrimental for isolated regions. A notable instance is Tonga, which faced a full internet blackout for a month in 2022 following a tsunami that affected a key submarine cable. For these areas, rapid service restoration is not merely a technical requirement but crucial for economic and social stability.

Conclusion

The UN’s efforts to safeguard submarine cables represent a vital advancement in strengthening the global communication framework. As threats to this essential infrastructure grow, the new advisory committee aims to enhance resilience, accelerate repairs, and protect economies and societies across the globe. The forthcoming summit in Nigeria will further reinforce international collaboration to tackle these challenges.

Q&A: Insights into Submarine Cable Protection

Q: What makes submarine cables so essential?

A:

Submarine cables transmit over 99% of global internet traffic, making them crucial for contemporary communication, business activities, and governmental operations.

Q: What are the causes of submarine cable damage?

A:

Damage often arises from natural disasters (such as earthquakes, tsunamis), human actions (including fishing, anchoring), or intentional sabotage.

Q: How does the ITU’s new advisory committee assist?

A:

This committee prioritizes enhancing cable resilience, hastening repair processes, and promoting international collaboration to effectively deal with interruptions.

Q: What occurs when a cable is damaged?

A:

Generally, internet traffic is redirected through alternate cables. However, remote areas might experience extended outages, as illustrated by Tonga’s month-long internet disruption in 2022.

Q: Can this initiative prevent sabotage?

A:

While the ITU does not investigate sabotage, bolstering cable resilience and repair mechanisms may reduce the impact of such instances.

Q: What is the timeline for these activities?

A:

Preliminary discussions have commenced, and a follow-up conference in Nigeria is set for February to propel the initiative forward.

Quick Overview: Essential Insights

• Tesla has commenced the rollout of its Full Self-Driving (FSD) Version 13.2 update in Australia, starting with its employees and a select group of customers.
• This update introduces major enhancements, transitioning from supervised to unsupervised FSD functionalities.
• Software version 2024.39.10 entails internal improvements following numerous revisions.
• This release is anticipated to facilitate a more authentic robotaxi experience.
• Australian right-hand-drive (RHD) vehicles are projected to receive this update by the first quarter of 2025.
• FSD V13 minimizes driver inputs, potentially enabling actions such as sleeping or using a mobile device during self-driving journeys.
• Tesla’s “We, Robot” event featured 50 autonomous Teslas operating safely, highlighting the maturity of the technology.

What’s New in Tesla’s FSD Version 13?

Tesla’s FSD Version 13.2 symbolizes a significant advancement in autonomous driving. This update, integrated into software version 2024.39.10, showcases a sophisticated system refined through extensive internal testing prior to customer access. The key feature? A shift from supervised to unsupervised self-driving capabilities. This indicates Tesla vehicles are progressing towards a future with minimal human interaction, where the car adeptly manages challenging driving situations independently.

The upgrade also covers enhancements in end-to-end highway driving capabilities. This function, previously made available to around 50,000 users in version 12.5.6.1, has since been optimized for smoother and more agile performance.

Unsupervised Driving: Progressing Towards Robotaxi Aspirations

One of the most thrilling elements of FSD V13 is the advancement towards “unsupervised” self-driving. Picture using your phone, watching a film, or even dozing off while your Tesla navigates the roads. This is the robotaxi reality that Tesla CEO Elon Musk has long envisioned. As human interventions decrease, the system’s dependability and sophistication are advancing rapidly.

Though this update marks a major achievement, it’s vital to recognize that regulatory endorsement for fully autonomous driving remains a challenge in numerous areas, including Australia.

When Will Australians Get Right-Hand-Drive Models?

Tesla owners in Australia are keenly awaiting the arrival of FSD V13 for right-hand-drive (RHD) vehicles. Presently, the rollout is centered on left-hand-drive models, yet Tesla fans remain optimistic for a release in Q1 2025 within Australia. This timeline is in accordance with Tesla’s overarching plan to extend FSD functionalities worldwide.

Australia’s distinctive driving scenarios—from busy urban streets to secluded outback routes—will provide a challenging environment for the new software’s adaptability.

Recent Updates: Tesla’s “We, Robot” Event

In October 2024, Tesla hosted its “We, Robot” event, effectively demonstrating the possibilities of autonomous driving. Fifty Teslas outfitted with the latest FSD software successfully transported event participants, illustrating the system’s dependability and resilience. This event emphasizes Tesla’s dedication to enhancing its autonomous technology before broad implementation.

Conclusion

Tesla’s FSD Version 13 software release is transformative for autonomous driving, bringing unsupervised functions nearer to realization. While the current rollout primarily targets left-hand-drive models, Australian Tesla owners are hopeful for this innovation to reach RHD models by early 2025. With diminished driver interventions and improved highway capabilities, FSD V13 is a crucial advancement towards a robotaxi future. Nonetheless, regulatory approvals and practical testing will be essential in deciding how quickly this technology achieves mainstream adoption.

Q: What is Tesla’s FSD Version 13?

A: Tesla’s FSD Version 13 is the latest version of its Full Self-Driving software, featuring unsupervised driving abilities and enhanced highway performance.

Q: When will FSD V13 be accessible for Australian RHD vehicles?

A: Tesla aims for a release in Q1 2025 for right-hand-drive (RHD) models in Australia.

Q: What improvements does FSD V13 offer over V12?

A: FSD V13 provides more seamless highway navigation, fewer driver interventions, and the prospect of unsupervised driving, making it a substantial improvement on V12.

Q: Are Tesla vehicles capable of driving without human oversight now?

A: While FSD V13 is a step closer to unsupervised driving, regulatory clearances and practical testing remain necessary for full autonomous operation.

Q: How does Tesla’s “We, Robot” event exhibit FSD’s reliability?

A: The event showcased 50 Teslas independently transporting attendees, demonstrating the maturity and strength of Tesla’s FSD technology.

Q: What challenges does Tesla’s FSD technology face in Australia?

A: Regulatory obstacles, practical testing in diverse Australian conditions, and modifying the technology for RHD vehicles are key challenges Tesla needs to tackle.