Blog - Page 2 of 205 - Techbest - Top Tech Reviews In Australia

Australians Affected Severely by Ticket Frauds: New Year’s Eve Events Experience Average Loss of A$432 per Individual


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Financial losses from ticket scams impacting Australians during New Year’s Eve events

Brief Overview

  • Average loss per incident of ticket scams is A$432.
  • One in five Australians miss out on events due to ticket fraud.
  • Gen Z and Millennials are the most exposed, with 15% losing A$750 or higher.
  • Social media serves as a major hub for ticket scams.
  • Only 6% of scam victims managed to avoid losses through secure payment options.
  • Official ticketing sites are the safest option for purchasing tickets.
  • Refrain from bank transfers to unknown individuals; utilize payment methods that offer buyer security.

Australians Experience Financial Setbacks Due to Ticket Scams

With New Year’s Eve approaching, Australians are keenly buying tickets for concerts, festivals, and sports events. Nevertheless, recent findings from PayPal Australia highlight that many fans are becoming victims of ticket scams, incurring an average loss of A$432 per event.

Growing Danger of Ticket Scams

One in five Australians claims to have missed events because of counterfeit or undelivered tickets. Alarmingly, nearly 10% have been scammed multiple times, suggesting the use of sophisticated scam techniques.

Younger Demographics at Higher Risk

Interestingly, younger Australians face greater risks of high-value losses. Approximately 15% of Gen Z and Millennial victims have indicated losses of A$750 or above, contrasting with older Australians who do not report such significant losses.

The Attraction of Discounted Tickets

The appeal of lower-priced tickets continues to pose a major threat. About 18% of Gen Z individuals are willing to risk buying tickets at questionable prices.

Deficiencies in Consumer Protection

Only 6% of scammed consumers managed to avert financial loss by utilizing payment methods that incorporate buyer protection. The majority of victims opted for payment options lacking any recourse, such as direct bank transfers.

Social Media: A Scamming Hotspot

Social media platforms are saturated with deceptive activities; yet half of Australians still buy tickets through these outlets. Scammers frequently employ fake digital ticket images or pose as genuine sellers to mislead buyers.

Ensuring Safety Through Secure Payment Methods

Utilizing secure payment solutions like PayPal, which provides Buyer Protection, can assist consumers in obtaining refunds if their tickets fail to arrive.

Official Platforms: The Best Option

As the demand for New Year’s Eve events skyrockets, Australians are encouraged to stick to approved ticketing platforms. The secondary market carries greater risks, with scammers establishing fake websites that imitate official sellers.

Reporting Unusual Offers

Reporting suspicious ticket offers helps safeguard the community. Over half of Australians would report a dubious offer, contributing to the prevention of others falling prey to scams.

Conclusion

As New Year’s Eve approaches, Australians face the dual thrill of attending events and the risk associated with ticket scams. With substantial financial losses reported, particularly among younger Australians, it is crucial to emphasize the use of secure payment methods and reliance on official ticket platforms to mitigate the risk of fraud.

Q&A

Q: What is the average financial loss for Australians affected by ticket scams?

A: The average financial loss per ticket scam incident is A$432.

Q: Which age group is at the highest risk of ticket scams?

A: Gen Z and Millennials are at the highest risk, with 15% reporting losses of A$750 or more.

Q: How can Australians safeguard themselves from ticket scams?

A: Australians can safeguard themselves by using secure payment methods such as PayPal, sticking to official ticketing platforms, and avoiding bank transfers to unknown individuals.

Q: What role does social media play in ticket scams?

A: Social media is a significant breeding ground for fraudulent ticket activities, with scammers employing fake digital ticket imagery and impersonating legitimate sellers.

Q: How effective are payment methods with buyer protection in preventing financial losses?

A: Payment options with buyer protection are quite effective, as merely 6% of scammed buyers utilizing these methods reported financial loss.

Q: What should consumers do if they come across a suspicious ticket offer?

A: Consumers should report any suspicious ticket offers to assist in protecting the broader community from scams.

Bluetooth Sports Headphones Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Bluetooth Sports Headphones, Wireless Bluetooth 5.4 Headphones with 4 ENC Noise Cancelling Mic, 68 Hours Hi-Fi Stereo Deep Bass Wireless Earbuds, LED Display, IP7 Waterproof Earphones with Ear Hooks

BHP’s Enduring Network Concentration Ready for AI Incorporation


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

BHP: Pioneering with AI-Ready Infrastructure

Brief Overview

  • BHP is utilizing its strong network infrastructure for AI adoption.
  • Emphasis on low latency and high throughput applications is essential.
  • IT and OT networks are expected to merge.
  • Investments in resilience, observability, and security are crucial.
  • AI aims to improve decision-making in mining activities.

AI-Ready Infrastructure: A Long-Standing Commitment

BHP's strategic network focus readies it for AI adoption

BHP’s dedication to high-performance network infrastructure is setting the stage for the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into its operations. At Cisco Live in Melbourne, Michelle Fernando, superintendent of operation technology (OT) networks, showcased BHP’s preparedness for AI, emphasizing the company’s focus on low latency and high throughput applications in demanding mining conditions.

Integration of IT and OT Networks

Fernando mentioned that AI is likely to facilitate the merging of IT and OT networks, which have historically functioned separately. This integration will demand secure solutions and shared infrastructure, potentially utilizing technologies like SD-WAN. Such convergence is anticipated to optimize operations and bolster security at mining sites.

Improving Decision-Making with AI

AI’s function in mining operations expands to delivering timely information for enhanced decision-making. Fernando pointed out the significance of AI in predictive maintenance and safety applications, which empower operators to make informed choices that improve operational efficiency and safety protocols.

Focusing on Network Resilience and Observability

BHP is planning future investments emphasizing network resilience and observability. Fernando articulated a vision for self-healing networks capable of automatically identifying and addressing issues, adjusting to shifting conditions such as varying terrains and weather. Improved visibility and observability are vital for anticipating and alleviating possible network disturbances.

Conclusion

BHP is strategically equipped to integrate AI into its mining operations, owing to its strong network infrastructure. By centering on the convergence of IT and OT networks and investing in advanced technologies, BHP aspires to boost efficiency, security, and decision-making processes in its operations.

Q&A

Q: What makes BHP’s network infrastructure suitable for AI?

A: BHP’s emphasis on low latency and high throughput applications in tough environments has resulted in a network framework that is well-prepared for AI adoption.

Q: How might AI influence the merging of IT and OT networks?

A: AI is anticipated to drive the integration of historically separate IT and OT networks, necessitating secure solutions and shared infrastructure for more efficient operations.

Q: What advantages does AI offer for mining operations?

A: AI delivers timely insights for predictive maintenance and safety, enabling operators to make knowledgeable decisions that enhance operational efficiency and safety protocols.

Q: What are BHP’s future investment goals for its network?

A: BHP intends to invest in network resilience and observability, aiming to create self-healing networks that can autonomously detect and rectify problems in changing conditions.

Q: How does BHP plan to improve network observability?

A: BHP seeks to enhance network visibility to foresee and mitigate potential interruptions, ensuring continuous and efficient mining operations.

Q: What technologies could be applied at BHP’s mining sites?

A: Technologies such as SD-WAN may be implemented to assist in converging IT and OT networks, improving security and operational efficiency.

EU to Require USB-C Chargers for Power Bricks and Monitors by 2028


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Brief Overview

  • By December 2028, the EU will mandate USB-C ports on power supplies.
  • Devices up to 240W, including monitors and routers, will be impacted.
  • This regulation aims to diminish electronic waste and energy usage.
  • Australian markets are anticipated to adopt these norms automatically.
  • Projected annual savings of around A$163 million by 2035.

Standardising the Power Adapter

For many years, peripheral devices have relied on proprietary barrel connectors and fixed cables. The risk of electronic waste escalates when these cables fail, making devices non-functional. The new EU regulation mandates the use of USB-C standards, alongside replaceable cables. This facilitates easy cable replacement in case of damage, accommodating devices up to 240W, ranging from routers to gaming displays.

Building on a Successful Basis

The shift to USB-C commenced with the Radio Equipment Directive. By late 2024, devices such as smartphones, tablets, and cameras will incorporate USB-C for charging. Laptops are expected to follow by April 2026. By 2028, wall chargers will also comply, ensuring a seamless transition, particularly in Australia, where companies like Apple and Samsung are already phasing out chargers with their products.

Environmental and Financial Effects

The European Commission predicts a 3% decrease in energy usage from chargers by 2035, resulting in significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. New energy efficiency criteria will ensure that chargers utilize less power when not in use. Financially, this is anticipated to yield savings of about €100 million yearly for consumers, which is roughly A$163 million.

Ending the Proprietary Cable Chaos

With the USB-PD standard, devices and chargers will interact to guarantee the appropriate voltage and current, safeguarding against device damage while facilitating rapid charging. A new “Common Charger” insignia will assist consumers in easily identifying compliant products, providing straightforward information about power output.

Innovation versus Standardisation

Some detractors contend that enforcing USB-C could hinder innovation in future charging technologies. Nevertheless, proponents argue that the standard is flexible, noting the recent enhancement in USB-C’s power capacity from 100W to 240W.

“Establishing common chargers for our smartphones, laptops, and other everyday devices is a wise strategy that prioritizes consumers while minimizing energy waste and emissions.”Dan Jørgensen, Commissioner for Energy and Housing, European Commission.

Implications for Australian Consumers

Australian consumers will gain advantages from EU regulations arising from worldwide standardisation efforts. By 2029, most new devices are expected to feature USB-C power inputs. This simplifies cable organisation and enables investment in high-quality, reusable chargers across different devices.

Bracing for a USB-C Future

The transition to a universal charging ecosystem is unavoidable. Manufacturers have a deadline to adapt, and detachable cables will improve product durability. In Australia, this shift is already evident in new devices at JB Hi-Fi and Harvey Norman. As the 2028 deadline nears, GaN technology is anticipated to become the norm for efficient chargers.

EU mandates USB-C chargers for power bricks and monitors by 2028

For additional information, visit the EU’s common charging solution page.

Conclusion

The EU’s requirement for USB-C ports on power supplies by 2028 seeks to standardise charging protocols, lessen electronic waste, and enhance energy efficiency. With global consequences, the Australian market is set to follow, resulting in environmental advantages and substantial financial savings for consumers.

Q: Which devices will the USB-C regulation impact?

A: The regulation applies to devices with power ratings up to 240W, including internet routers, computer displays, and smart home devices.

Q: What is the reason for standardising USB-C?

A: USB-C is being standardised in order to decrease electronic waste, enhance charging efficiency, and ensure a smooth user experience across devices.

Q: How does this affect consumers in Australia?

A: Although Australia lacks similar domestic laws, the global landscape of tech manufacturing means Australian consumers will reap the benefits of these standardisations.

Q: What are the environmental advantages of the mandate?

A: The mandate is anticipated to lower energy usage and greenhouse gas output, with a foreseen 3% reduction in charger energy consumption by 2035.

Q: Will USB-C inhibit innovation in charging technologies?

A: Critics worry it might, but supporters argue that USB-C’s adaptable and evolving nature permits future innovations and enhancements.

US Legislators Call for Openness Regarding Licensing Assessments for Nvidia H200 Chip Transactions with China


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Quick Read

  • US legislators call for transparency regarding Nvidia H200 chip transactions with China.
  • Trump permits Nvidia H200 chip transactions with China with a 25% tariff.
  • Possible reversal of Biden’s prohibition on sales of advanced AI chips to China.
  • Worries about China’s tech and military progress.
  • Nvidia aims to deliver H200 chips to China by mid-February.

US Legislators Call for Transparency on Nvidia H200 Chip Transactions with China

US legislators call for transparency regarding Nvidia H200 chip transactions with China

Trump’s Updated Policy on Nvidia H200 Chip Transactions

In a major policy change, President Donald Trump has declared the approval for the sale of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, contingent upon a 25% government fee. This decision stands in stark contrast to the former Biden administration’s prohibition on advanced AI chip sales to China, driven by national security issues.

Legislators Demand Transparency

Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Gregory Meeks have urged the US Commerce Department to disclose specifics of the licensing reviews related to these transactions. They stressed the necessity for transparency, requesting that all license applications be made public and that approved licenses be communicated within 48 hours of their approval.

Concerns Regarding National Security

The legislators conveyed their concerns about the military capabilities of the exported chips and their implications for US economic and national security. Warren has previously insisted on Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang testifying before Congress, underlining the dangers of furthering China’s technological and military supremacy.

Potential Repercussions for the Chip Industry

This new allowance for sales may have significant implications for the global chip market, potentially influencing the demand for chips produced in China. Nvidia is set to begin shipping the H200 chips to China by mid-February, catering to initial orders from existing inventory.

Conclusion

The recent approval to sell Nvidia’s H200 chips to China has ignited calls for transparency from US legislators. With possible ramifications for national security and a departure from prior administration policies, this situation represents a pivotal topic of conversation in the technology sector.

Q&A Session

Q: What does the H200 chip entail?

A: The H200 chip ranks as Nvidia’s second most powerful AI chip, recognized for its sophisticated functionality in artificial intelligence tasks.

Q: What raises concerns among US lawmakers regarding the sales?

A: Legislators worry that the chips could bolster China’s technological and military strengths, endangering US national security.

Q: How is this decision distinct from previous policies?

A: This marks a departure from the Biden administration’s ban on advanced AI chip sales to China, indicating a shift in policy under Trump.

Q: When is the expected commencement of shipments?

A: Nvidia intends to initiate shipments of the H200 chips to China ahead of the Lunar New Year holiday in mid-February.

Q: What could be the effect on the chip industry?

A: The sale of these chips to China could shift demand patterns within the global chip industry, potentially influencing the market for chips made in China.

Sony Pulse 3D Wireless Headset Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Sony Pulse Explore Wireless Earbuds (White) /PS5

US Denies Authorization for Fresh Designs from DJI and Other Overseas Drones


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Brief Overview

  • The US FCC has denied approvals for new drone designs from Chinese firms like DJI and Autel.
  • This action is part of the US’s larger initiative to address national security threats linked to international drones.
  • The ruling does not impact drones that have previously received FCC approval.
  • DJI, a significant competitor in the US drone sector, has voiced its dissatisfaction regarding the ruling.
  • The US government refers to potential dangers such as unauthorized surveillance and data theft as key issues.
  • This decision is in line with the US’s goal to foster local drone manufacturing.

US Strengthens Drone Approval Process Amid Security Issues

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States has added prominent Chinese drone manufacturers DJI and Autel to its “Covered List”. This inclusion effectively prohibits these firms from gaining approval to market new drone models or parts in the US, citing national security concerns.

US prevents approvals for new models of DJI and other foreign drones

Tensions Rise with Chinese Technology

This ruling signals a notable increase in tensions between Washington and Chinese tech companies. The FCC’s measures are part of a wider effort to limit imports of Chinese technology, following the US Commerce Department’s announcement regarding impending regulations on Chinese drone imports.

Effects on Current Drones

The FCC has specified that its ruling will not impact the import, sale, or operation of drones that have already been approved. Consumers who possess drones from these manufacturers may continue to operate them legally, indicating that the ruling primarily affects forthcoming sales and new product introductions.

Response from DJI

DJI, which commands a significant portion of the US commercial drone landscape, has expressed its regret over the FCC’s decision. The company pointed out that the executive branch has not provided specific information supporting the ruling. While not specifically called out, DJI perceives this as an obstacle to launching new drone models in the US.

National Security Issues in the US

The security assessment that prompted this decision brought to light various risks, such as unauthorized surveillance and vulnerabilities regarding sensitive data. The US government seeks to lessen its dependence on foreign drones, in line with President Donald Trump’s earlier executive order aimed at boosting domestic drone production.

Political Responses and Industry Consequences

US officials, including Sebastian Gorka from the National Security Council, have emphasized the significance of US-made drones for national security. The ruling has also garnered support from lawmakers concerned about the counterintelligence threats posed by foreign drones.

Conclusion

The US FCC’s determination to block new drone model approvals from Chinese firms such as DJI highlights escalating worries regarding national security threats. Although existing drones remain unaffected, the ban prevents the rollout of new models, aligning with broader US objectives to enhance security and support local manufacturing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which companies are impacted by the FCC’s ruling?

A: The ruling impacts Chinese drone makers like DJI and Autel, among others, barring them from receiving approvals for new drone models in the US.

Q: Does this ruling influence drones already available?

A: No, the FCC’s ruling does not affect drones that have already been green-lit for sale and use in the US.

Q: What prompted the US to take this step?

A: The US cites national security reasons, including risks of unauthorized surveillance and data theft, for tightening restrictions on foreign drone imports.

Q: What is DJI’s reaction to the FCC’s ruling?

A: DJI conveyed disappointment, mentioning that the US government has not disclosed specific information to justify the decision. The firm believes it impacts their capacity to launch new models in the US.

Q: Are there any exemptions to the ban on new drone models?

A: The Pentagon might make future decisions that could allow certain drones to be exempt from these limitations if determined to not present security risks.

Q: How does this ruling relate to broader US initiatives?

A: This ruling corresponds with US strategies to encourage domestic production and reduce reliance on foreign technology, especially from China.

AKG N5 Hybrid TWS Headphone, White Review


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

AKG N5 Hybrid TWS Headphone, White

New York Requires Mental Health Alerts on Social Media Sites


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Mental Health Disclosures on Social Media in New York

New York Implements Mental Health Disclosures on Social Media Platforms

Quick Overview

  • New York requires mental health disclosures on platforms that include infinite scroll, auto-play, and algorithm-driven feeds.
  • This law seeks to safeguard young individuals from the potential mental health repercussions of social media.
  • The state’s attorney general can impose fines of up to US$5000 per infraction.
  • Australia has recently instituted a social media prohibition for minors under 16.
  • Analogous regulations are in effect in California and Minnesota.
  • Social media corporations such as TikTok, Snap, Meta, and Alphabet have not issued statements.
Legislation for mental health warnings in New York social media

New York’s Legislative Measures

In a pivotal initiative to protect the mental health of young users, New York Governor Kathy Hochul has introduced a new statute mandating social media platforms to display mental health warnings. This legislation focuses on platforms that incorporate features such as infinite scrolling, auto-play, and algorithmic feeds, which are believed to promote excessive usage and carry potential mental health consequences.

Comparison with Other Health Warnings

Governor Hochul drew parallels between these warnings and those present on tobacco products or plastic packaging, which convey risks like cancer or suffocation, respectively. The objective is to enhance awareness and lessen the adverse effects of social media usage, especially among younger demographics.

Legal Aspects and Enforcement

The law is relevant to actions taking place within New York, though it does not apply to users accessing platforms from outside the state. The state’s attorney general is authorized to pursue legal action against platforms that fail to comply, with civil fines of up to US$5000 for each infringement.

Worldwide Context and Industry Reaction

This initiative in New York is part of a wider movement of legislative attempts to address the impact of social media on youth. Australia has recently enacted a ban on social media for individuals under 16, with similar laws already in place in California and Minnesota. While major tech firms like TikTok, Snap, Meta, and Alphabet have yet to react, global apprehension regarding social media’s influence on mental health is steadily increasing.

Summary

New York’s legislation requires mental health disclosures on social media platforms featuring addictive elements to protect younger users. With the possibility of substantial penalties, this law signifies a rising awareness of the necessity to confront the mental health effects of social media on younger generations.

Q&A Section

Q: Which features on social media platforms does the New York statute address?

A: The statute addresses platforms that have infinite scrolling, auto-play, and algorithm-driven feeds.

Q: What is the fine for breaking this new law in New York?

A: Breaches can lead to civil fines of up to US$5000 for each case.

Q: How does this law correspond to actions in other regions?

A: California and Minnesota have similar laws, and Australia has recently prohibited social media for minors under 16.

Q: Has the technology sector reacted to this legislation?

A: Leading companies like TikTok, Snap, Meta, and Alphabet have not yet provided feedback on the legislation.

Q: Who holds the power to implement this law?

A: The New York State Attorney General has the authority to enforce the law and impose penalties for violations.

Q: Why are these warnings likened to those for tobacco or plastic packaging?

A: The analogy is drawn to emphasize the necessity of communicating possible risks to protect users, similar to how other items warn about health and safety hazards.