Blog - Page 17 of 191 - Techbest - Top Tech Reviews In Australia

Australian Authorities Conduct Raid on WiseTech Following Allegations of Founder’s Share Transactions

Vanessa May on October 29, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

WiseTech Under Scrutiny: Founder Accused of Share Transactions

Australian authorities probe WiseTech for share transactions

Brief Overview

  • Australian authorities have executed a search at WiseTech Global’s Sydney office regarding alleged share transactions.
  • Founder Richard White along with three staff members are currently being investigated.
  • Share prices have plummeted nearly 17% to reach a six-month low.
  • The investigation is a follow-up to Richard White’s contentious return as chairman.
  • Reports indicate that shares valued at over $200 million were sold during a blackout phase.

Authorities Conduct Search at WiseTech Global

Australia’s corporate watchdog, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), together with the Australian Federal Police, has carried out a search at WiseTech Global’s Sydney office. This operation forms part of an inquiry into suspected share trading actions by founder Richard White and three other staff members, prompting the company’s shares to plummet to a level not seen in over six months.

Effect on WiseTech Shares

Following the search, WiseTech’s stock experienced a severe decline, dropping nearly 17% to $73.69, marking its lowest value in over six months. This drastic fall illustrates the market’s response to the ongoing inquiry and the gravity of the allegations.

Allegation Details

The claims against Richard White and his colleagues concern improper trading of WiseTech shares from late 2024 until early 2025. Reports suggest that White may have disposed of shares worth over $200 million during a blackout period, neglecting to inform the market as mandated.

Context and Governance Issues

WiseTech has been under observation since February, when ASIC initiated preliminary investigations following a mass departure of executives and White’s unanticipated return as chairman. The company has encountered ongoing governance difficulties, contributing to a 40% decrease in share value this year.

Conclusion

The search at WiseTech Global highlights serious accusations against founder Richard White and others, with possible implications for the company’s governance and market position. As inquiries progress, WiseTech is under considerable pressure to tackle these challenges and re-establish shareholder trust.

FAQ

Q: Why was WiseTech Global searched?

A: The search is part of an investigation into supposed improper share transactions by founder Richard White and three employees.

Q: What has been the impact of the search on WiseTech’s stock price?

A: WiseTech’s shares have fallen nearly 17%, hitting their lowest level in over six months.

Q: What specific accusations have been made against Richard White?

A: Accusations include selling over $200 million worth of shares during a blackout period without notifying the market.

Q: What other challenges does WiseTech face?

A: WiseTech is addressing wider corporate governance issues and a 40% decline in share value this year.

Q: What has been Richard White’s recent involvement with WiseTech?

A: Richard White returned as chairman after a mass executive departure, raising further governance concerns.

F5 Notifications: Security Incident Influencing Government Worries to Impact Revenue

Nicholas Kinports on October 28, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

F5 Security Incident: Effects on Government Worries and Revenue

Quick Summary

  • F5 has adjusted its annual revenue forecast downwards after a security incident.
  • The incident involved hackers likely supported by a state, reportedly from China, breaching F5’s systems.
  • There were potential risks to US and UK government systems, leading to federal alerts.
  • Several BIG-IP clients were affected, requiring prompt system updates.
  • F5 expects short-term sales interruptions but has not seen an immediate impact on demand.
  • Annual revenue growth is expected to be between zero and four percent.

Details of the Security Incident

F5 has recently reported a security breach that has affected its anticipated yearly revenue, which is now below Wall Street forecasts. The breach comprised long-lasting access to the company’s systems, including the compromise of source code for a crucial cybersecurity product.

F5 indicates that breach alarming governments will affect revenue

Allegations of State-Sponsored Hacking

The breach has been linked to state-sponsored hackers, allegedly from China, according to sources familiar with the investigation. This has raised concerns among US officials, who have verified that federal government networks were potential targets, prompting urgent security warnings.

Effects on BIG-IP Users

The security event primarily impacted users of F5’s BIG-IP systems. CEO Francois Locoh-Donou noted that these clients had to swiftly upgrade to the latest software versions. A limited number of users experienced data exfiltration, although the information was reported to be non-sensitive.

Financial Outlook and Market Effects

F5 forecasts a full-year revenue growth between zero and four percent, falling short of the 4.8 percent growth expected by analysts. The revenue projection for the first quarter, estimated to be between US$730 million and US$780 million, also comes in below expectations due to potential disruptions, including a US government shutdown.

Conclusion

The recent security breach at F5 carries significant consequences, not just for the company but also for its customers and potentially affected governmental systems. Although immediate demand impacts have not been observed, the incident has raised concerns regarding systemic vulnerabilities and the necessity for improved cybersecurity protocols. The financial impacts are expected to be realized in the first half of the fiscal year, with aspirations for stabilization by the end of the year.

Questions & Answers

Q: What caused the security breach at F5?

A: The breach was allegedly initiated by state-supported hackers from China who accessed F5’s systems, including the source code for a vital cybersecurity service.

Q: How have clients been affected by the incident?

A: Users of F5’s BIG-IP systems were required to upgrade their software swiftly, and some encountered limited data exfiltration, although the data was not deemed sensitive.

Q: What impact will the breach have on F5’s financial situation?

A: F5 expects revenue growth between zero and four percent, which is lower than analysts’ predictions, with anticipated disruptions occurring in the first half of the fiscal year.

Q: What role do government systems play in this breach?

A: The breach triggered concerns due to the possible risks to US and UK government systems, resulting in federal alerts and swift measures.

Nothing Ear (3) Wireless Earbuds Review

Matthew Miller on October 28, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Nothing Ear (3) Wireless Earbuds Super Mic 45dB Hybrid Active Noise Cancelling Bluetooth Headphones Hi-Res 6 Mics, 12mm Dynamic Bass Boost, Dual Connect ANC Sport Ear Buds for iPhone Android, Black

ROSESELSA EARFREE-i5 TWS In-Ear Headphones Review

Matthew Miller on October 27, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

ROSESELSA EARFREE-i5 TWS In-Ear Headphones with Hybrid Active Noise Cancellation, LDAC HiFi Sound, Bluetooth 5.3, Game Mode, 48dB ANC, IPX5 Water Resistant, Electric Blue

ACCC Accuses Microsoft of Deceiving 2.7 Million Australians Regarding M365 Charges

Vanessa May on October 27, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Microsoft Under Legal Scrutiny for Deceptive 365 Charges

Quick Overview

  • ACCC claims Microsoft misled 2.7 million Australians concerning Microsoft 365 charges.
  • Claims involve unjustified fees for the AI tool Copilot.
  • Microsoft purportedly hid less expensive subscription alternatives.
  • Legal proceedings aim for fines, injunctions, and compensation for consumers.
  • Potential maximum penalty could amount to $50 million or triple the financial gain.

Context of the Claims

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has initiated legal action against Microsoft, accusing the technology company of misleading 2.7 million Australian customers regarding the expenses linked to its Microsoft 365 (M365) subscriptions. The issue revolves around the integration of Microsoft’s AI tool, Copilot, within subscription plans, which allegedly caused customers to think they were required to pay more.

ACCC claims Microsoft misled 2.7 million Australians concerning M365 charges

Specifics of the Claims

As stated by the ACCC, Microsoft allegedly told its customers that to maintain access to M365, they were obligated to incur extra costs for Copilot, despite having the option to continue without integrating the AI tool. Such information was reportedly conveyed through emails and blog posts, thus misleading customers regarding their subscription options.

Microsoft’s Reaction

A representative for Microsoft Australia expressed that the company is examining the ACCC’s allegations and highlighted its dedication to consumer trust, transparency, and compliance with legal and ethical norms. Microsoft claims it is ready to engage positively with the regulatory body.

Legal Consequences

The ACCC seeks to impose sanctions, request injunctions, and pursue consumer compensation. Although the specific penalties have yet to be revealed, Australian law allows for a maximum fine of $50 million per infraction, or three times the financial benefit obtained from the actions.

Conclusion

The ACCC has charged Microsoft with misleading Australian customers about Microsoft 365 subscription costs by bundling Copilot and allegedly not revealing less expensive options. The legal action aims to tackle these purportedly deceptive practices and safeguard consumer rights.

Q: What allegations are made against Microsoft?

A: The ACCC claims Microsoft misled consumers into paying unjust charges for the AI tool Copilot within their M365 subscriptions.

Q: How did Microsoft allegedly deceive customers?

A: Microsoft purportedly informed customers they had to pay additional fees to keep using M365 with Copilot, without disclosing a more affordable, non-Copilot choice.

Q: What has Microsoft articulated in response to these claims?

A: Microsoft has indicated it is currently reviewing the allegations and is dedicated to collaborating with the ACCC to ensure its practices align with legal and ethical expectations.

Q: What potential penalties could Microsoft encounter if proven guilty?

A: Microsoft may face fines up to $50 million for each breach or triple the financial advantage gained from the actions, as per Australian legislation.

Q: Why is this case important for Australian consumers?

A: This case underscores the necessity for transparency in subscription services and may impact forthcoming practices in the technology sector regarding consumer rights in Australia.

TOZO O2 Lightweight Wireless Earbuds Review

Matthew Miller on October 27, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

TOZO O2 Lightweight Wireless Earbuds with Multi-Angle Adjustment, True Wireless Bluetooth 5.3 Headphones with Open Ear Design for Long-Lasting Comfort, Crystal-Clear Calls for Driving, Meeting

Jemena Improves Month-End Efficiency with Innovative Finance Automation System

Nicholas Kinports on October 27, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Revolution in Finance Automation at Jemena

Quick Overview

  • With BlackLine, Jemena automates its month-end financial processes, cutting over 24 hours from manual work.
  • There are 10 use cases in place, with an additional 25 under development.
  • The automation emphasizes journal entries that are complex and labor-intensive.
  • Jemena partners with Deloitte and BlackLine to advance automation efforts.
  • Finance teams are motivated to explore more automation possibilities.

Revolution in Finance Automation at Jemena

Jemena enhances finance automation for month-end operations

Optimizing Month-End Operations

Jemena, the owner of the electricity network assets, has made significant progress in modernizing its financial operations. By leveraging BlackLine’s software, Jemena has achieved the automation of crucial month-end finance workflows, greatly enhancing efficiency and reducing manual workload by more than 24 hours. This development signifies a crucial transition toward adopting technology for managing intricate and time-consuming tasks.

Widening Automation Applications

After effectively implementing 10 initial automation use cases, Jemena is now working on launching an additional 25 use cases. This growth aims to further optimize the management of complex journal entries, minimizing human error and freeing essential time for finance teams to concentrate on strategic pursuits.

BlackLine’s Contribution to Finance Automation

Since 2015, Jemena has been utilizing BlackLine, primarily for account reconciliations to ensure the integrity of reporting. The recent extension to cover month-end journals signifies a strategic refinement of their current system, enabling automatic data matching from different sources and effective classification of work-in-progress (WIP) items.

Partnership with Deloitte and BlackLine

This initiative is a joint venture with Deloitte and BlackLine, aiming to discover and apply additional automation possibilities across Jemena’s financial operations. The incorporation of these modern technologies represents a proactive stance towards financial management.

Conclusion

Jemena’s move to automate month-end finance operations showcases the increasing trend of utilizing technology for operational efficiency. By collaborating with industry frontrunners like Deloitte and BlackLine, Jemena is setting benchmarks for innovation in financial management within the energy sector.

Q: What is the primary aim of Jemena’s finance automation?

A:

The main objective is to boost efficiency by minimizing manual processing time, particularly for intricate journal entries, thereby enabling finance teams to redirect efforts towards more strategic initiatives.

Q: In what ways has BlackLine’s software been employed by Jemena?

A:

Originally utilized for account reconciliations and ensuring reporting accuracy, BlackLine’s software is now being extended to automate month-end financial processes, including managing complex journal entries.

Q: What are the anticipated results of the expanded automation initiative?

A:

By broadening the range of automation use cases, Jemena aims to further decrease manual workloads, improve data precision, and motivate finance teams to pursue additional automation possibilities.

Q: Who are the primary collaborators in this initiative?

A:

This project is a collaborative effort with Deloitte and BlackLine, both of which are instrumental in pinpointing and executing automation solutions for Jemena’s financial operations.

Q: What technologies are being utilized in Jemena’s automation process?

A:

Jemena employs BlackLine’s software to automate financial processes, supported by data integration and matching functions to efficiently manage journal entries and reconciliations.

US Judges Caution That AI Application Leads to Mistakes in Judicial Decisions

David Leane on October 27, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

AI in the Courts: Issues and Solutions

Brief Overview

  • Federal judges in the US admit to inaccuracies in judgments due to the application of AI.
  • AI solutions such as ChatGPT and Perplexity were utilized without adequate supervision.
  • Judges have established new policies regarding AI and review protocols.
  • The judiciary is encouraged to enforce stricter AI regulations to safeguard the rights of litigants.
  • The legal profession is under examination over inappropriate AI use in legal proceedings.

AI in Legal Rulings: A Complicated Issue

The incorporation of artificial intelligence in the legal system is a divisive subject, particularly after two US federal judges acknowledged that AI resources led to mistakes in recent judgments. This admission has ignited a discussion about AI’s position in legal proceedings and the urgency for rigorous oversight.

Judges Recognize Mistakes

US District Judges Henry Wingate and Julien Xavier Neals have come forward to confront the mistakes in their latest court orders, which were partially composed using AI technologies. Judge Neals disclosed that an intern utilized OpenAI’s ChatGPT without permission, resulting in a flawed ruling in a securities lawsuit. Likewise, Judge Wingate pointed out the involvement of Perplexity by a law clerk, which caused a lack of oversight.

Establishing New Protocols

In light of these occurrences, both judges have moved to avert future mistakes. Judge Neals has rolled out a documented AI policy and improved the review procedures in his chambers. These initiatives are intended to ensure that AI tools are employed thoughtfully and that every decision receives a comprehensive human review prior to its release.

Demand for Enhanced AI Regulations

US Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley has called for the judiciary to adopt more rigorous AI regulations. He stressed that the judiciary must guarantee that AI deployment does not violate the rights of litigants or undermine equitable treatment under the law. Grassley’s appeal underscores the rising apprehension regarding AI’s involvement in the legal domain.

Legal Sector Under Examination

The legal sector is facing increasing scrutiny regarding its AI practices. Judges across the nation have penalized attorneys in multiple instances for not adequately vetting AI-generated content. This reality emphasizes the critical need for legal practitioners to apply due diligence when integrating AI into their professional activities.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence possesses the capacity to transform the judiciary by optimizing processes and augmenting decision-making. Nevertheless, recent occurrences illuminate the dangers linked with its improper application. The judiciary must find a balance between the advantages of AI and the requirement for effective oversight and comprehensive policies to protect legal rights.

Q&A: Responding to Inquiries

Q: What measures have the judges taken to rectify AI-related mistakes?

A: Judges Neals and Wingate have instituted new AI regulations and improved their review processes to guarantee appropriate oversight and avoid future errors.

Q: What is the reason for the demand for stronger AI regulations in the judiciary?

A: Stricter AI regulations are essential to ensure that the use of AI does not infringe upon legal rights or compromise fair treatment, as revealed by recent inaccuracies in court rulings.

Q: What has been the legal community’s reaction to AI misuse?

A: The legal community is under heightened scrutiny, with judges administering penalties to lawyers who neglect to validate AI-generated outcomes, emphasizing the necessity for prudent AI practice.

Q: What are the possible advantages of AI in the judicial system?

A: AI can streamline judicial procedures, enhance efficiency, and improve decision-making. Nonetheless, these advantages need to be weighed against meticulous oversight to prevent mistakes.

Nokia Essential True Wireless Earphones (E3511) Review

Matthew Miller on October 26, 2025


We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Nokia Essential True Wireless Earphones (E3511), Fully Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth, Noise Cancellation, External Sound Capture / 25 Hours of Music Playback, Instant Connection, Hands-Free Calling