Techbest – Top Tech Reviews In Australia
The best in Australian gadgets and technology
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
2022 Wireless Earbuds, Tribit Qualcomm QCC3040 Bluetooth 5.2, 4 Mics CVC 8.0 Call Noise Reduction 50H Playtime Clear Calls Volume Control True Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds Headphones, FlyBuds C1 Black
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
JBL Wave Flex True Wireless Stereo Earbuds, Beige
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
JBL Wave Flex True Wireless Stereo Earbuds, White
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
In an unexpected turn of events, Waymo—the self-driving vehicle sector of Alphabet (the parent company of Google)—has broadened its alliance with Uber. The companies have revealed that Uber will take charge of Waymo’s driverless car services exclusively in Austin, Texas, and Atlanta, Georgia. This move prompts discussions about the trajectory of autonomous vehicle technology, its economic implications, and the possible friction between Uber and its human drivers.
Waymo has been instrumental in the self-driving car sector since its inception in 2009 as part of Google. The company has made substantial investments in autonomous vehicle technology, currently operational in Phoenix, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. Nonetheless, the recent verdict to allow Uber to manage operations in Austin and Atlanta exclusively has raised some eyebrows.
With this agreement, Uber will handle the daily operations of Waymo’s autonomous vehicles in these two new cities. Considering the significant potential of driverless ride-hailing services, especially in populous urban areas, this decision implies that Waymo might be forgoing a considerable revenue avenue—thus the expression “giving away the golden goose.”
With a collective populace of about 1.48 million, Austin and Atlanta present highly lucrative markets for autonomous vehicles. Both cities boast tech-savvy inhabitants and rapidly developing infrastructure, making them prime candidates for deploying autonomous vehicle technology.
However, what distinguishes this expansion from Waymo’s other territories is that Uber will be the sole operator. This situation leads to inquiries about why Waymo would relinquish direct oversight of such promising new markets. The rationale may be rooted in the economics of scaling and managing autonomous vehicle services.
Waymo has consistently encountered hurdles when it comes to extending its services beyond its original testing grounds. The technology that powers autonomous vehicles is intricate; it relies on a blend of lidar, radar, cameras, and computational power to operate safely. Moreover, the vehicles must navigate using highly precise HD maps, necessitating extensive scanning of every new area.
Additionally, the Jaguar I-Pace, which Waymo utilizes, carries a hefty cost of around USD $70,000 before incorporating the bespoke hardware essential for autonomous operation. The overall expenses tied to the development and upkeep of these vehicles, coupled with the necessary network infrastructure, complicate achieving the economies of scale required to reduce ride prices for users.
In cities like Austin and Atlanta, where the demand for ride-hailing is notable, Waymo may determine that transferring operations to Uber allows for cost-sharing while still retaining a foothold in these vital markets.
While Uber has previously attempted to create its own autonomous vehicle technology, it has not fared as well as companies like Waymo. By collaborating with Waymo, Uber acquires access to advanced technology without the substantial investment in research and development. However, this also places Uber in a precarious situation regarding its human drivers.
If autonomous vehicles begin to take on a greater share of rides, Uber’s human drivers might find themselves sidelined. The reduced necessity to pay drivers could lower costs for Uber in the long term, yet it might also incite backlash from drivers who depend on the platform for their income. Some drivers have already expressed concerns about Uber’s foray into autonomous vehicles, fearing job insecurity.
As Uber and Waymo currently appear to benefit from each other’s capabilities, the long-term scenario may not be as favorable. Should Uber continue to broaden its autonomous vehicle usage, it could eventually find itself directly competing with Waymo, as both firms strive for supremacy in the driverless ride-hailing sphere.
This collaboration might also give rise to heightened competitive friction between the two entities. Waymo’s technological edge is significant, but Uber’s extensive ride-hailing platform provides unmatched access to customers. Ultimately, one company may seek to acquire the other, or the relationship could become strained, resulting in a split or possible bankruptcy for one of the players.
Waymo’s foray into Austin and Atlanta alongside Uber signifies a major transition in the autonomous vehicle sector. By allowing Uber to take exclusive control of its driverless car services in these two locations, Waymo could be attempting to alleviate the steep costs associated with scaling its operations. Nevertheless, this choice also brings up worries regarding the future of Uber’s human drivers and potential long-term rivalries between the two firms.
Waymo probably partnered with Uber to divide the hefty costs of scaling its autonomous vehicle services. By capitalizing on Uber’s existing framework and customer reach, Waymo can concentrate on tech innovation while Uber manages operations in these new locales.
This partnership may spark tensions between Uber and its human drivers. As autonomous vehicles start handling more rides, the availability of rides for human drivers could diminish, potentially affecting their earnings. Some drivers have already raised alarms about this development.
Austin and Atlanta are fast-growing tech hubs with a joint population of about 1.48 million individuals. These cities offer lucrative prospects for ride-hailing ventures, making them prime targets for autonomous vehicle expansion.
The Jaguar I-Pace utilized by Waymo costs approximately USD $70,000 before any added hardware is integrated. Apart from vehicle expenses, there are costs linked to network infrastructure, HD mapping, and ongoing software development, all of which render scaling operations expensive.
Uber has endeavored to create autonomous vehicle technology previously but encountered both technical and financial challenges. By aligning with Waymo, Uber can tap into state-of-the-art technology without the significant commitment to research and development.
Indeed, there exists the possibility of sustained competitive tension. While the collaboration is mutually beneficial at present, both Uber and Waymo could find themselves vying for control in the driverless ride-hailing market as the technology gains broader acceptance.
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
Donner Wireless Earbuds Noise Cancelling, Bluetooth 5.2 Earphones with ENC for Clear Calls, 12mm Drivers & Balanced Armature, App for Custom EQ, 32H Playtime, Fast Charging – Dobuds ONE, Blue
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
Australia is adopting a tough approach against misinformation, proposing fines of up to **5% of global revenue** for social media platforms that do not mitigate the dissemination of falsehoods. This initiative aligns Australia with various nations advocating for heightened accountability from global tech giants, including Facebook (Meta), X (formerly Twitter), and others.
The legislation intends to address content that jeopardizes **election integrity**, impacts **public health**, or threatens **critical infrastructure**. This comes amid increasing worries that tech platforms, many based outside Australia, exploit their international reach to circumvent local laws and regulations.
The proposed law requires social media companies to establish **codes of conduct** aimed at managing misinformation and disinformation. These codes will need to receive approval from the **Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)**. If a platform fails to devise an acceptable code, ACMA has the authority to impose its own standards. Non-compliant platforms could incur fines reaching **5% of their global turnover**.
The bill focuses on a wide array of harmful false information, including:
While many have endorsed the legislation, it has also raised alarms regarding **free speech**. Opponents contend that the bill may bestow excessive control to the government and tech firms over what is considered acceptable discourse. Opposition representative James Paterson has expressed worries, asserting that **Australians’ political views** should remain free from censorship by either the government or foreign platforms.
Minister for Communications **Michelle Rowland** has responded to these apprehensions, clarifying that the bill won’t empower ACMA to compel the removal of individual posts or accounts. Rather, it is designed to focus on overarching platform policies. Additionally, the legislation includes **exemptions** for professional news organizations, artistic works, religious content, and user-created material, aside from government-sanctioned content.
Australia’s efforts to regulate social media are mirrored across the globe. Nations are intensifying their actions against the proliferation of **false information** online, particularly concerning **elections**, **pandemics**, and **national security**.
In Europe, the **Digital Services Act** is poised to impose fines on tech companies that do not reduce misinformation, while the **US** debates how to address the dissemination of disinformation on platforms like X and Facebook.
Social media companies, especially **Meta** and **X**, are at the forefront of this regulatory challenge. Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, has voiced apprehensions regarding the financial ramifications of such legislation. Previously, Meta indicated it might prevent access to professional news content in Australia over a separate regulation mandating payment to media organizations.
On the other hand, **X**, acquired by billionaire **Elon Musk** in 2022, has significantly decreased its content moderation efforts, raising concerns that the platform could turn into a haven for unchecked misinformation.
The **Australian Communications and Media Authority** (ACMA) has embraced the proposed legislation, which would formalize its **regulatory role** in combating misinformation and disinformation across digital avenues. ACMA is anticipated to be a pivotal figure in enforcing the new regulations, ensuring that tech firms fulfill their responsibilities and curtail the propagation of harmful content.
Australia’s recent legislation is intended to tackle the escalating issue of misinformation on social media platforms, imposing significant fines to enforce adherence. The bill assigns tech companies the duty to establish appropriate codes of conduct while empowering ACMA to regulate non-compliant platforms. Despite receiving support, the legislation has raised alarms over free speech and political censorship concerns. By taking this action, Australia joins a worldwide movement of countries seeking to rein in tech giants and uphold the safety and integrity of online environments.
The legislation aims to tackle the spread of misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms, particularly content that threatens election integrity, public health, or critical infrastructure.
Social media companies could face fines of up to 5% of their global revenue if they fail to comply with the legislation.
ACMA will approve codes of conduct from social media platforms and enforce its own standards if platforms fail to do so. It will also play a regulatory role in ensuring compliance.
While the legislation does not force the removal of individual posts or accounts, concerns have been raised about the potential for political censorship. The bill includes exemptions for professional news, artistic, and religious content.
Meta has previously expressed concerns about the financial impact of such regulations and has threatened to block news content. X, under Elon Musk, has reduced its content moderation, which could make it more vulnerable to the new rules.
Yes. Australia’s efforts are part of a broader global push to hold tech giants accountable for the spread of misinformation. Other countries, like those in the EU, are also introducing similar regulations.
The timeline for the legislation has not been specifically mentioned, but it is expected to become a significant issue ahead of Australia’s upcoming federal election.
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
The Australian government has declared a comprehensive federal inquiry into the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) in its public sector activities. This action stems from rising apprehensions about the swift incorporation of AI technologies without sufficient governance structures to manage their application. The inquiry, launched by the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit (JCPAA), seeks to closely examine how AI is being adopted in government departments and whether current regulations and policies effectively protect its use.
The JCPAA is responsible for ensuring accountability among Commonwealth agencies, voicing concerns regarding the potential hazards linked to AI application in government functions. The committee notes that although the use of AI in the public sector is increasing, there seems to be a deficit of governance frameworks aimed at appropriately regulating and overseeing this integration. The inquiry will investigate if the present legislative, regulatory, and policy frameworks are “fit for purpose” in dealing with AI technologies.
Establishing governance frameworks, particularly concerning AI, is vital to ensuring adherence to ethical standards, privacy regulations, and cybersecurity measures. The inquiry will assess whether current structures are capable of managing the complexities of AI, such as machine learning, automation, and data analysis, which are progressively being utilized by government agencies to enhance service delivery and decision-making processes.
A primary concern highlighted by the JCPAA is the possible misuse of AI technologies. This misuse could manifest in various forms, from unintended biases present in automated decision-making to privacy breaches arising from negligent data management. The inquiry will delve into the dangers posed by AI systems and whether sufficient oversight mechanisms exist to evaluate AI-generated or AI-assisted results.
As AI becomes increasingly integral to public sector operations, it is essential to ensure that these technologies maintain transparency, equity, and accountability. The inquiry is expected to investigate the testing and validation processes of AI systems to prevent mistakes and misjudgments that could significantly affect Australian citizens.
Another focal point of the inquiry is the internal ability of public sector agencies to effectively embrace and employ AI technologies. While AI offers significant prospects for enhancing efficiency and fostering innovation, the successful integration of these systems necessitates a well-trained workforce capable of managing, interpreting, and effectively utilizing AI outcomes. The inquiry will review the current capacity of government departments in regards to AI management, assessing the availability of adequate training initiatives and resources aimed at upskilling public sector staff.
Cultivating an AI-competent workforce is crucial for ensuring responsible usage of AI systems to their full extent. In the absence of proper education, there exists a risk that agencies could misuse or misinterpret AI-produced data, resulting in suboptimal decisions and potentially harming the public.
The JCPAA has extended an invitation for public submissions to gather broader perspectives on the government’s AI utilization. The committee will analyze submissions that were originally amassed as part of a past inquiry into Commonwealth financial reports for 2022-23. These contributions, in conjunction with new insights, will guide the inquiry’s direction and enhance the understanding of AI application in public sector entities.
Interested individuals and organizations can present their feedback until October 25, 2023. The outcomes of the inquiry are likely to carry significant implications for the future rollout and governance of AI across Australian government agencies.
The Australian government is under increasing inspection regarding its artificial intelligence usage, with a federal inquiry initiated to explore the frameworks and risks tied to AI adoption in public sector activities. Led by the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit, the inquiry will address governance issues, potential misuse risks, oversight mechanisms, and the internal capabilities of governmental departments to manage AI responsibly. Public contributions are welcome until October 25, 2023, allowing individuals and organizations to voice their opinions on the future of AI in governance.
The inquiry seeks to analyze the current, planned, and future applications of AI by public sector bodies and determine if existing legislative, regulatory, and policy frameworks adequately oversee and monitor these applications. It will also investigate misuse risks and evaluate the public sector’s internal capacities to effectively manage AI technologies.
The inquiry is being conducted by the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit (JCPAA), which holds the responsibility of ensuring accountability among Commonwealth agencies.
Key risks include the possibility of biased AI-generated outcomes, privacy infringements stemming from inadequate data handling, and a lack of clarity in AI-driven processes. Concerns also exist regarding insufficient oversight, which may lead to misuse or errors in AI outputs.
Public submissions will remain open until October 25, 2023. These contributions will influence the inquiry’s findings and deepen the understanding of AI’s current applications in government operations.
Once the inquiry assesses submissions and compiles its findings, it is likely to publish a report with recommendations on how the government should advance with AI adoption and governance. These insights may lead to policy reforms or development of new regulatory frameworks overseeing AI’s use in the public sector.
AI has the potential to greatly influence government services, encompassing areas from healthcare to social services. Ensuring that AI is employed ethically and responsibly in governmental operations is crucial to safeguarding citizens’ rights, privacy, and access to equitable outcomes. The inquiry aims to secure that AI technologies serve all Australians while minimizing any associated risks.
Governance of AI is vital to guarantee that AI systems are utilized transparently, accountably, and fairly. Without proper governance, there is a danger that AI technologies may lead to unintended outcomes, such as biased decisions, privacy breaches, and cybersecurity risks.
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
JBL Vibe Beam Black
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
The realm of cybersecurity is swiftly transforming, and Qantas is rising to the occasion by launching a thorough array of cybersecurity initiatives for the fiscal year 2024-2025. The airline is integrating secure-by-design principles throughout its entire organization and enhancing critical cyber capabilities through automation, ensuring strength in an increasingly digital environment.
Qantas’ 2024 sustainability report showcases a significant growth in its cybersecurity activities relative to prior years. While earlier reports emphasized cyber safety culture, awareness, and employee training, the latest findings indicate a transition towards improvements in processes, technology, and governance. These modifications arise in response to increasing complexity in cybersecurity threats, particularly within the aviation sector.
The airline is not only running phishing simulations and providing tailored cybersecurity training to its workforce, but it is now addressing broader and more complex issues. This includes refining governance processes to handle third- and fourth-party cyber risks—an essential aspect for safeguarding the company’s supply chain. These initiatives are part of Qantas’ ongoing strategy to ensure its cybersecurity framework is sufficiently strong to mitigate risks from both direct suppliers (third parties) and their suppliers (fourth parties).
Qantas is wholeheartedly adopting the “secure-by-design” methodology, which has become fundamental to cybersecurity strategies across numerous industries. Similar to the National Australia Bank (NAB), Qantas is concentrating on embedding secure-by-design practices within its operations. Secure-by-design means that security is integrated into the design and development stages of software and systems, rather than being incorporated later. This strategy minimizes vulnerabilities and enhances the overall security architecture from the outset.
In FY25, Qantas intends to continue evolving secure-by-design practices and further assimilate them throughout the organization. This proactive strategy is crucial for establishing a resilient infrastructure capable of enduring both internal and external threats.
Qantas is also looking ahead by automating critical cybersecurity capabilities. Automation within cybersecurity aids in streamlining processes such as threat detection, incident response, and vulnerability management, enabling the airline to react to threats more quickly and effectively. The airline is harnessing new technologies, including generative AI, to further enhance these capabilities.
Generative AI can aid in recognizing patterns in cyber threats that traditional methods might miss. This enables quicker remediation of vulnerabilities and stronger defenses against emerging threats. By automating essential facets of its cybersecurity operations, Qantas seeks to bolster its overall resilience and stay proactive in the ever-evolving cyber threat landscape.
Cybersecurity is not solely an internal concern for Qantas; it is a collective industry challenge. To tackle this, Qantas is joining forces with other aviation sector players and the Australian federal government to enhance cyber resilience throughout the industry. This partnership is crucial, as the aviation sector is a primary target for cyberattacks due to its dependence on complex systems and sensitive customer information.
Through close collaboration with industry peers and governmental entities, Qantas aims to establish a consolidated defense against possible cyber threats, ensuring the safety and security of its operations and customer data.
Qantas has gained important insights from a recent privacy issue that arose in May 2023. Due to a technological update, the Qantas app briefly malfunctioned, showing data from other customers. The airline took immediate action, voluntarily reporting the issue to the Australian privacy regulator and informing affected clients. This incident underscored the need for more robust privacy and data security measures.
Qantas has since utilized the lessons learned from this event to enhance its technology and privacy frameworks. More broadly, the organization is also examining high-profile cyber incidents that have impacted other Australian and international firms, applying these insights to further strengthen its cybersecurity measures.
Qantas is making significant strides to enhance its cybersecurity framework, focusing on integrating secure-by-design practices across the organization. The airline’s broadened initiatives in automating key cybersecurity functions, improving third- and fourth-party risk management, and collaborating with industry peers and government entities reflect a proactive stance on cyber resilience. Additionally, the airline is leveraging new technologies such as generative AI to stay ahead of potential threats while learning from past incidents to uphold the highest standards of data privacy and security.
Secure-by-design is a cybersecurity approach in which security features are integrated during the design and development phases of software and systems. Qantas is adopting this method to ensure security is rooted in its operations, thereby reducing vulnerabilities and enhancing overall resilience to cyber threats.
Third- and fourth-party cyber risks arise from external suppliers and their suppliers, potentially impacting Qantas’ supply chain. By strengthening governance in these areas, Qantas aims to reduce the risks of cyber incidents that could indirectly affect its operations through these supply chains.
Automation and AI will assist Qantas in streamlining key cybersecurity operations such as threat detection and response. By employing generative AI, Qantas can recognize patterns in cyber threats more efficiently, which facilitates quicker and more effective reactions to potential risks.
After the privacy issue in May 2023, Qantas voluntarily reported the situation to the Australian privacy regulator and reached out to affected customers. The airline has since leveraged this experience to bolster its technology and privacy measures in order to avert future incidents.
Qantas is collaborating closely with aviation industry peers and the Australian government to enhance cybersecurity across the sector. Such collaboration is vital for establishing a united front against cyber threats, particularly in an industry characterized by complexity and interconnectivity.
During the 2024-2025 financial year, Qantas intends to continue strengthening secure-by-design practices, augmenting internal and external security testing, and further automating key cybersecurity processes. The airline will also investigate new technologies such as generative AI to strengthen its defenses.
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
OTL Nintendo Legend of Zelda TWS Wireless Earpods
