David Leane

Patients anxious as ManageMyHealth data breach develops

David Leane on January 8, 2026

We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!

Brief Overview

ManageMyHealth data breach impacts as many as 129,500 patients.
Kazu ransomware group requests a ransom of US$60,000.
The company has obtained a High Court injunction to safeguard against data misuse.
The New Zealand government is conducting an inquiry into the incident.
In Australia, penalties for data breaches can soar up to $50 million.

Overview of the ManageMyHealth Data Breach

A major data breach involving ManageMyHealth, the trans-Tasman health information portal, has sparked concerns among numerous patients regarding the potential exposure of their sensitive information. The breach, linked to the Kazu ransomware group, has resulted in the compromise of 108 gigabytes of patient data.

Concerns escalate over healthcare data breach linked to ManageMyHealth incident

Details of the Ransomware Attack

The breach was identified on December 30, with Kazu allegedly having extracted a significant amount of patient data. In spite of the extensive data exposure, patients were only made aware of the situation when accessing the ManageMyHealth website or utilizing its mobile app, without receiving any direct notifications from the company.

Effect on Patients

With more than 1.85 million registered patients, ManageMyHealth has indicated that 6-7% of its users are impacted. This translates to around 111,000 to 129,500 individuals whose information could have been compromised.

Legal and Security Actions

The company has secured a High Court injunction to block third-party access to the compromised data. ManageMyHealth claims the breach has been controlled and asserts that its platform is now safe. The mobile application has been suspended, and users are cautioned against interacting with Kazu.

Investigation in Progress

Simeon Brown, New Zealand’s Health Minister, has announced an investigation into the breach to determine its causes and assess the sufficiency of the company’s data protection efforts. Despite its seriousness, New Zealand’s penalties for such breaches are relatively lower than Australia’s stringent fines.

Conclusion

The ManageMyHealth data breach highlights the urgent necessity for strong cyber security protocols, particularly within the healthcare sector. As the inquiry progresses, affected patients remain vigilant, while the company endeavors to provide assurances regarding the safety of their data.

Q: What is the scale of the data breach?

A: The breach involved 108 gigabytes of data, affecting around 111,000 to 129,500 patients.

Q: How did the breach happen?

A: It is reported that the hackers accessed the system using a legitimate user password, taking advantage of flawed access controls.

Q: What legal steps have been taken?

A: ManageMyHealth secured a High Court injunction to prevent any further access to the compromised data.

Q: What potential consequences does ManageMyHealth face?

A: In New Zealand, penalties are limited to NZ$10,000, while Australia can enforce fines up to $50 million for severe breaches.

Q: Has the situation been resolved?

A: ManageMyHealth claims the breach is contained and the platform is secure, though investigations are still ongoing.

Q: Is there a ransom being sought?

A: Yes, Kazu is requesting a ransom of US$60,000 for the compromised data.

Nvidia Alpamayo: Open-Source AI Framework Set to Compete with Tesla’s FSD

David Leane on January 7, 2026

Nvidia Alpamayo: Open-Source AI Engine Ready to Compete with Tesla’s FSD

Nvidia Alpamayo: AI Engine for Autonomous Vehicles

Quick Read

Nvidia unveils Alpamayo, an open-source AI framework for self-driving vehicles.
Alpamayo showcases human-like reasoning, posing a challenge to Tesla’s FSD lead.
The flagship version, Alpamayo 1, includes a 10-billion-parameter vision-language-action model.
Nvidia offers AlpaSim, a simulation platform for evaluating autonomous technologies.
This open-source model empowers various manufacturers to innovate in self-driving technology.

Eliminating the Black Box in Autonomous Driving

Nvidia’s Alpamayo seeks to tackle the persistent challenge of unpredictable situations in autonomous driving. The Alpamayo 1 model utilizes a 10-billion-parameter vision-language-action (VLA) model, implementing a chain-of-thought mechanism to navigate intricate driving circumstances. This method enables vehicles to assess possible dangers and determine the safest actions, transcending simple pattern recognition.

“The moment for physical AI akin to ChatGPT is upon us — when machines begin to comprehend, reason, and interact in the real world.” Jensen Huang, Founder and CEO, NVIDIA.

The Impact of Reasoning on Driving

Alpamayo’s reasoning-centered methodology guarantees that autonomous vehicles can articulate their choices, delivering the transparency that regulators and safety-oriented drivers have been seeking. This framework can analyze its surroundings and focus on safety, presenting a rational strategy in unforeseen circumstances.

“The model tackles issues in a systematic manner, considers all potential outcomes, and selects the safest path.” Ali Kani, Vice President of Automotive, NVIDIA.

A Significant Challenge to Tesla’s Dominance

By releasing Alpamayo as an open-source project, Nvidia enables other automotive manufacturers to keep pace with Tesla’s software advancements. Brands such as Jaguar Land Rover, Lucid, and Volvo can now leverage and adapt the AI model for their vehicles, equalizing the competition in the development of autonomous technology.

Simulation and Data Support

Nvidia’s AlpaSim delivers an expansive simulation environment, allowing developers to assess autonomous systems within a digital replica of the real world. This tool, along with a broad dataset, permits firms to build tailored autonomous systems without the necessity of establishing costly in-house AI research labs.

Global Consequences for the Automotive Sector

The open-source aspect of Alpamayo indicates that high-level autonomy is no longer exclusive to a select few companies. With appropriate technology, any manufacturer can adopt advanced autonomous capabilities, making safety advancements more widely available and shifting the emphasis towards the computing capabilities of vehicle hardware.

The Future of Autonomous Technology

Nvidia Alpamayo represents a step towards AI that can reason and act with the judgment characteristic of humans. If successful, this open-source model could foster a broad ecosystem to rival Tesla’s data edge, providing consumers with increased options and progressing the advancement towards fully autonomous vehicles.

Summary

Nvidia’s launch of Alpamayo at CES 2026 marks a pivotal development in the realm of autonomous vehicle technology. By delivering an open-source AI model with reasoning abilities reminiscent of human thinking, Nvidia endeavors to democratize self-driving technology and challenge Tesla’s existing supremacy. The accompanying AlpaSim simulation platform and extensive dataset equip manufacturers with the tools necessary to craft personalized autonomous systems, potentially revolutionizing the global automotive landscape.

Q: What is Nvidia Alpamayo?

A: Nvidia Alpamayo is an open-source AI model intended to incorporate human-like reasoning into self-driving cars, confronting Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software.

Q: In what way is Alpamayo distinct from other autonomous vehicle technologies?

A: In contrast to conventional AI systems, Alpamayo employs a reasoning-driven approach, enabling vehicles to analyze complex scenarios and reach educated decisions, enhancing both transparency and safety.

Q: What does AlpaSim entail?

A: AlpaSim is Nvidia’s simulation framework that allows developers to evaluate autonomous systems within a digital twin of the actual environment, supported by a comprehensive dataset.

Q: What effect does Nvidia’s open-source model have on the automotive sector?

A: By making Alpamayo open source, Nvidia provides all manufacturers with the opportunity to access and adapt the AI model, enhancing competition and encouraging widespread utilization of advanced autonomous functions.

Q: What are the global effects of Alpamayo’s release?

A: Alpamayo’s open-source nature might democratize self-driving technology, dismantling obstacles and ensuring that safety advancements are reachable by all manufacturers, altering perceptions of vehicle hardware.

Three Executives Associated with Spyware Removed from US Sanctions List

David Leane on January 2, 2026

US Removes Intellexa Spyware Executives from Sanctions List

Quick Overview

Sanctions removed from three leaders associated with the Intellexa spyware group.
The US Treasury Department partially overturns prior sanctions set by Biden’s administration.
Intellexa’s Predator spyware implicated in global surveillance scandals.
Executives proved their separation from Intellexa to aid in their delisting.

US Relaxes Sanctions on Intellexa Leaders

Executives affiliated with Intellexa spyware have been removed from the US sanctions list

Context of Sanctions

The US administration, led by President Joe Biden, had previously imposed sanctions on seven individuals connected to the Intellexa group. This was part of a wider effort to address the spread of surveillance technologies to authoritarian governments.

Intellexa and Its Worldwide Influence

Led by former Israeli intelligence officer Tal Dilian, Intellexa has found itself at the center of controversies concerning its “Predator” spyware, including alleged spying on journalists and political opponents in Greece, as well as reported attempts by the Vietnamese government to breach the accounts of US Congress members.

Sanctions Overturned

The US Treasury Department’s recent move to lift sanctions on three executives—Sara Hamou, Andrea Gambazzi, and Merom Harpaz—signals a change in approach. A US official indicated that this was part of a standard administrative procedure following requests for a review, with the individuals taking steps to distance themselves from the consortium.

Continued Issues

Even with some individuals removed from the sanctions list, Intellexa and its founder Tal Dilian continue to be under investigation for their roles in enabling surveillance practices. The consortium remains a central topic in debates regarding the ethics and ramifications of commercial spyware.

Conclusion

The relaxation of sanctions on executives associated with Intellexa showcases the complexities surrounding the regulation of the global spyware sector. While some individuals have managed to show their disassociation from contentious practices, broader ethical dilemmas related to such technologies remain unresolved.

Q: Why were sanctions first applied to Intellexa leaders?

A: Sanctions were established due to Intellexa’s part in promoting the spread of spyware technology to authoritarian regimes and accusations of misuse in surveillance efforts.

Q: What prompted the removal of sanctions on the three executives?

A: The executives took actions to extricate themselves from the Intellexa group, leading the US government to reevaluate the sanctions as part of an administrative initiative.

Q: What significance does Intellexa’s “Predator” spyware have in these controversies?

A: “Predator” spyware is tied to numerous surveillance scandals, including the tracking of journalists and political officials in Greece, alongside attempts to hack US Congress members.

Q: Are all Intellexa leaders currently free of sanctions?

A: No, Tal Dilian, the head of Intellexa, is still on the sanctions list, indicating ongoing concerns about his involvement in the group’s activities.

Q: How has Intellexa responded to these charges?

A: Representatives of Intellexa have not issued statements regarding the lifting of sanctions, and Tal Dilian has denied involvement in specific claims, including those concerning Greece.

Origin Energy allocates $210M in Kraken’s separation from Octopus Energy.

David Leane on December 30, 2025

Origin Energy allocates $210 million towards Kraken’s separation from Octopus Energy.
Kraken, with a valuation of $12.91 billion, will establish itself as a standalone entity.
Kraken’s AI-driven platform manages more than 70 million customer accounts globally.
This demerger opens doors for a possible Kraken IPO in the next two years.
Origin Energy holds a 22.7% share in Kraken after the deal.
Origin relinquishes exclusivity on Kraken’s services in Australia in exchange for further equity.

Kraken’s Autonomy: A New Era

In a notable development in the energy landscape, Octopus Energy from Britain has revealed the separation of its technology division, Kraken, into an independent firm, valued at an impressive US$8.65 billion (AU$12.91 billion). This action follows a fruitful funding initiative led by D1 Capital Partners.

Origin Energy invests in Kraken's separation from Octopus Energy

Kraken’s Contribution to the Energy Industry

Kraken delivers state-of-the-art energy software solutions to prominent utilities and energy firms internationally, including EDF, National Grid US, Tokyo Gas, and Australia’s own Origin Energy. Its AI-empowered operating system is currently responsible for overseeing over 70 million customer accounts, underlining its extensive influence in the energy sector.

Financial Support and Expansion Opportunities

Current and new investors, including Origin Energy, are poised to acquire around US$1 billion in Kraken’s shares, with Origin dedicating US$140 million (AU$210 million). This funding represents a crucial advancement toward Kraken’s separation from Octopus Energy, which will still hold a 13.7% interest.

IPO Possibilities Ahead

The demerger has triggered conversations regarding a potential Initial Public Offering (IPO) for Kraken within the next two years, as indicated by The Financial Times. While Reuters could not substantiate this, the possibility of a Kraken IPO introduces an intriguing aspect to its future.

Strategic Decisions by Origin Energy

Origin Energy, utilizing Kraken to enhance its retail operations, will sustain a 22.7% stake in Kraken after the deal closes. Furthermore, Origin has decided to forfeit exclusivity on Kraken’s services in Australia, procuring an additional 1.5% equity stake in exchange. This strategic alteration may foster increased competition and improve service offerings across Australia’s energy landscape.

Conclusion

Kraken’s transition to an independent organization signifies a considerable transformation in the energy sector, with notable investments and strategic adjustments setting the stage for potential growth and development. Origin Energy’s proactive stance demonstrates its dedication to embracing innovative technology to transform its business framework and potentially reshape the Australian energy scene.

Q: What is Kraken’s primary function in the energy sector?

A: Kraken offers AI-powered energy software solutions to leading utilities and energy organizations globally, overseeing over 70 million customer accounts.

Q: How much is Kraken valued at following the spinout?

A: Kraken’s valuation stands at US$8.65 billion (AU$12.91 billion) after the separation.

Q: What role does Origin Energy play in Kraken’s future?

A: Origin Energy has invested US$140 million (AU$210 million) in Kraken, retains a 22.7% stake, and has waived exclusivity for additional equity.

Q: Is there an IPO planned for Kraken?

A: There are indications of a potential IPO for Kraken within the coming two years, although this has not been officially verified.

Q: How does the demerger affect Octopus Energy?

A: Post-demerger, Octopus Energy will keep a 13.7% share in Kraken and will secure an extra US$320 million investment into its operations.

Q: What impact might this have on the Australian energy market?

A: By waiving exclusivity, Origin Energy may promote heightened competition and innovation in the Australian energy sector as more companies gain access to Kraken’s technology.

US Denies Authorization for Fresh Designs from DJI and Other Overseas Drones

David Leane on December 28, 2025

Brief Overview

The US FCC has denied approvals for new drone designs from Chinese firms like DJI and Autel.
This action is part of the US’s larger initiative to address national security threats linked to international drones.
The ruling does not impact drones that have previously received FCC approval.
DJI, a significant competitor in the US drone sector, has voiced its dissatisfaction regarding the ruling.
The US government refers to potential dangers such as unauthorized surveillance and data theft as key issues.
This decision is in line with the US’s goal to foster local drone manufacturing.

US Strengthens Drone Approval Process Amid Security Issues

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States has added prominent Chinese drone manufacturers DJI and Autel to its “Covered List”. This inclusion effectively prohibits these firms from gaining approval to market new drone models or parts in the US, citing national security concerns.

US prevents approvals for new models of DJI and other foreign drones

Tensions Rise with Chinese Technology

This ruling signals a notable increase in tensions between Washington and Chinese tech companies. The FCC’s measures are part of a wider effort to limit imports of Chinese technology, following the US Commerce Department’s announcement regarding impending regulations on Chinese drone imports.

Effects on Current Drones

The FCC has specified that its ruling will not impact the import, sale, or operation of drones that have already been approved. Consumers who possess drones from these manufacturers may continue to operate them legally, indicating that the ruling primarily affects forthcoming sales and new product introductions.

Response from DJI

DJI, which commands a significant portion of the US commercial drone landscape, has expressed its regret over the FCC’s decision. The company pointed out that the executive branch has not provided specific information supporting the ruling. While not specifically called out, DJI perceives this as an obstacle to launching new drone models in the US.

National Security Issues in the US

The security assessment that prompted this decision brought to light various risks, such as unauthorized surveillance and vulnerabilities regarding sensitive data. The US government seeks to lessen its dependence on foreign drones, in line with President Donald Trump’s earlier executive order aimed at boosting domestic drone production.

Political Responses and Industry Consequences

US officials, including Sebastian Gorka from the National Security Council, have emphasized the significance of US-made drones for national security. The ruling has also garnered support from lawmakers concerned about the counterintelligence threats posed by foreign drones.

Conclusion

The US FCC’s determination to block new drone model approvals from Chinese firms such as DJI highlights escalating worries regarding national security threats. Although existing drones remain unaffected, the ban prevents the rollout of new models, aligning with broader US objectives to enhance security and support local manufacturing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which companies are impacted by the FCC’s ruling?

A: The ruling impacts Chinese drone makers like DJI and Autel, among others, barring them from receiving approvals for new drone models in the US.

Q: Does this ruling influence drones already available?

A: No, the FCC’s ruling does not affect drones that have already been green-lit for sale and use in the US.

Q: What prompted the US to take this step?

A: The US cites national security reasons, including risks of unauthorized surveillance and data theft, for tightening restrictions on foreign drone imports.

Q: What is DJI’s reaction to the FCC’s ruling?

A: DJI conveyed disappointment, mentioning that the US government has not disclosed specific information to justify the decision. The firm believes it impacts their capacity to launch new models in the US.

Q: Are there any exemptions to the ban on new drone models?

A: The Pentagon might make future decisions that could allow certain drones to be exempt from these limitations if determined to not present security risks.

Q: How does this ruling relate to broader US initiatives?

A: This ruling corresponds with US strategies to encourage domestic production and reduce reliance on foreign technology, especially from China.

Goodman Group Finalizes Huge $14 Billion Data Centre Deal

David Leane on December 27, 2025

Goodman Group’s Growth in Europe

Quick Overview

Goodman Group collaborates with Canada Pension Plan Investment Board for a $14 billion data centre expansion throughout Europe.
The collaboration seeks to bolster the AI infrastructure landscape in Europe.
Goodman is transitioning from logistics to become a key player in AI infrastructure.
The primary focus is on Frankfurt, Amsterdam, and Paris, involving a $3.9 billion investment.
The projects are designed to provide 435 megawatts of primary power and 282MW of IT capacity.
Construction is anticipated to start by June 30, 2026.

Goodman Group’s Growth in Europe

Goodman Group, based in Sydney, has unveiled a major project in collaboration with the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) to establish data centres throughout Europe. This $14 billion agreement signifies a crucial advancement for Goodman, enhancing its footprint in the swiftly developing AI infrastructure sector.

Goodman Group finalizes $14 billion data centre deal

Growing Demand for Data Centres

Interest in data centres has dramatically increased this year, fueled by major tech companies and AI hyperscalers planning significant infrastructure investments. Goodman’s alliance with CPPIB aligns with its strategic initiative to grow its data centre operations, catering to the rising need for adaptable AI infrastructure.

Strategic Alliance with CPPIB

This collaboration signifies CPPIB’s inaugural entry into the European data centre arena, commencing with a $3.9 billion investment. The partnership emphasizes project development in central cities like Frankfurt, Amsterdam, and Paris, targeting a collective capacity of 435 megawatts of primary power and 282MW of IT load.

Timeline and Execution of the Project

Goodman Group intends to initiate construction by June 30, 2026. The ventures are engineered for swift market entry, with secured power connections, planning approvals, and advanced site infrastructures already established.

Conclusion

The $14 billion arrangement between Goodman Group and CPPIB signifies a noteworthy milestone in expanding AI infrastructure throughout Europe. With a forward-thinking strategy and significant investment, Goodman is poised to emerge as a considerable entity in the global data centre industry.

Common Questions

Q: What is the primary goal of Goodman’s partnership with CPPIB?

A: The goal of the partnership is to enhance Goodman’s influence in the European data centre arena, prioritizing AI infrastructure development.

Q: Which cities are prioritized in the project’s initial phase?

A: The initial emphasis is on constructing data centres in Frankfurt, Amsterdam, and Paris.

Q: What amount of power will the new data centres generate?

A: The projects will provide 435 megawatts of primary power along with 282MW of IT load.

Q: When is the expected start date for construction?

A: Construction is projected to begin by June 30, 2026.

Q: How does this partnership align with Goodman’s strategic vision?

A: This initiative showcases Goodman’s shift from a logistics-focused company to a holistic AI infrastructure provider.

Telstra’s Unauthorized Utilization of ConnectID Revealed

David Leane on December 26, 2025

Quick Read

Telstra received an official reprimand for utilizing ConnectID prior to receiving regulatory consent.
A total of 18,388 prepaid SIM cards were activated through ConnectID from late 2024 to early 2025.
ACMA now authorizes the application of ConnectID for verifying prepaid identities.
No harm to consumers stemmed from Telstra’s early deployment of ConnectID.
ACMA intends to conduct a thorough review of rules regarding prepaid identity verification by 2026.

Overview of Telstra’s ConnectID Usage

Telstra was given a formal reprimand after it became known that the telecommunications company utilized ConnectID, a privacy-focused identity verification service, to validate prepaid customers before it had been officially approved. This took place while meeting its know your customer (KYC) requirements, involving 18,388 prepaid SIMs activated from late 2024 to mid-February 2025.

Telstra's early use of ConnectID revealed

What Does ConnectID Entail?

ConnectID is an identity verification service offered by Australian Payments Plus, utilizing identity checks conducted by financial institutions. While accredited under the Digital ID Act, it was not explicitly cleared for prepaid identity checks at the time of Telstra’s usage. Currently, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has officially granted its use to telecommunications companies.

Response from ACMA and Changes in Regulation

Even though Telstra’s early use of ConnectID raised concerns, ACMA affirmed that there was no resultant consumer harm. Telstra has since received the necessary authorization valid until the new regulations took effect. Following the inquiry, ACMA has proposed modifications to the regulations and conducted a public consultation that garnered widespread support.

Consequences for the Telecommunications Sector

The public consultation has initiated a wider discussion regarding ACMA’s ruling on prepaid identity verification, which encompasses not only identity verification regulations but also other facets of providing prepaid services. ACMA aims to perform a “comprehensive review and update” of this ruling, prioritizing it for 2026.

Conclusion

Telstra’s premature adoption of ConnectID brings to light the difficulties and intricacies of adhering to regulatory standards within the telecommunications industry. While there was no reported consumer harm, the event has prompted regulatory updates and an impending examination of prepaid service regulations. This scenario highlights the necessity of keeping up with regulatory modifications and the advantages of utilizing reliable identity services to bolster data security.

Q: What is ConnectID’s function?

A: ConnectID aims to simplify identity verification procedures by using identity checks performed by banks, thereby lessening the requirement for organizations to manage sensitive identity documents.

Q: Why was Telstra given a formal reprimand?

A: Telstra received a formal reprimand due to its use of ConnectID for prepaid identity verification without having received regulatory approval.

Q: Has ACMA now endorsed the use of ConnectID?

A: Yes, ACMA has now formally approved the use of ConnectID by telecommunications companies for prepaid identity verification.

Q: What actions is ACMA pursuing following this incident?

A: ACMA is revising and updating the prepaid regulations, with a significant overhaul scheduled as a priority for 2026.

Q: Was there any consumer detriment due to Telstra’s use of ConnectID?

A: No consumer detriment was reported as a consequence of Telstra’s early usage of ConnectID.

Q: Why do organizations prefer services like ConnectID?

A: Organizations favor using ConnectID as it helps eliminate the necessity to store copies of identity documents, which are frequently targeted by cyber threats.

Twitch Improves Visibility for Australian and New Zealand Streamers, Ignites Debate Over Promotion of OnlyFans Softcore Material

David Leane on December 23, 2025

Quick Read

Twitch unveils a specific directory for streamers from Australia and New Zealand.
This effort seeks to enhance local visibility and assist regional creators.
Debate emerges regarding the promotion of NSFW content in the directory.
Questions are raised about the absence of filters for adult material.

Twitch Unveils ANZ Directory

To improve the discovery of local talent, Twitch has launched a new directory tailored for Australian and New Zealand streamers. This initiative makes it easier to locate creators within the same time zone who reflect local culture.

Debate Over NSFW Content

However, the ANZ directory has sparked debate by displaying NSFW content without adequate warnings. The leading channel, velvet_7, listed under ‘Just Chatting’, faces criticism for endorsing material that verges on softcore pornography, with direct links to OnlyFans via their Linktree.

Twitch directory controversy with adult content

Community Reaction and Concerns

While the move to support regional creators is generally welcomed, numerous individuals express disappointment regarding its implementation. The visibility of adult content at the forefront of the directory is regarded as a distraction from the legitimate and diligent content creators that the directory intends to showcase.

Potential Effects on Local Creators

For many emerging streamers, visibility is a key aspect of their developmental journey. Twitch’s plan to give a platform to local creators is compromised by the inclusion of content that may not correspond with the desired family-friendly image, potentially influencing the perception and outreach of authentic creators.

Streamers from Australia and New Zealand on Twitch

Summary

Twitch’s recently launched ANZ directory represents a crucial advancement in enhancing the visibility of Australian and New Zealand streamers. Nonetheless, the ongoing promotion of NSFW content raises concerns regarding content moderation and the platform’s dedication to highlighting genuine talent from the area.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the aim of Twitch’s ANZ directory?

A:

The directory is designed to assist users in discovering and supporting Australian and New Zealand content creators, facilitating the process of finding streamers within the same time zone and cultural setting.

Q: What makes the directory controversial?

A:

The controversy arises from the showcasing of NSFW content without warnings, detracting from the intended emphasis on authentic local streamers.

Q: How can Twitch respond to the content issues?

A:

Twitch could enforce more stringent content filters and establish distinct sections for adult material to ensure that family-friendly content is prioritized.

Q: How might this affect local creators?

A:

While the directory provides increased visibility, the overshadowing adult content could dissuade potential audiences from engaging with the platform, impacting the outreach of genuine creators.

Preparing for Power Outages: Storm Resistance Approaches in North East Victoria

David Leane on December 22, 2025

Anticipated storms and heatwaves in North East Victoria are leading to preparations for possible power outages.
Ensuring all devices are charged and having a portable power station are essential actions to remain connected during outages.
The Bluetti Elite 100 V2 provides dependable backup power with a 1,024Wh capacity and a 1,800W output.
Maintain operational essential services such as internet and water through proper backup preparations.
Regular updates from the Bureau of Meteorology and a well-stocked emergency kit bolster storm preparedness.

Getting Ready for Extreme Weather in North East Victoria

The Bureau of Meteorology has issued an urgent alert for North East Victoria, predicting severe storms and heatwaves. Residents are encouraged to prepare for possible power interruptions, which are frequently caused by weather-related damage to infrastructure.

The Power Preparation Checklist Before the Storm

Before the storm arrives, ensure all your devices, including smartphones, tablets, wearables, and headphones, are charged. A charged phone is critical for receiving emergency notifications via the VicEmergency app and keeping in touch with family and friends.

Also, make sure to charge portable battery packs such as the Bluetti Elite 100 V2. Having a dedicated power station ensures you are not completely dependent on small pocket power banks during outages.

Battery backup for storm resilience in Victoria

The Advantages of a Portable Power Station

Unlike conventional generators, portable power stations like the Bluetti Elite 100 V2 operate silently and are suitable for indoor use. Thanks to LiFePO4 battery technology, it boasts over 4,000 charging cycles, ensuring durability.

The Elite 100 V2 has a capacity of 1,024Wh and an output of 1,800W, enough to keep vital items such as a refrigerator running for hours, which is critical during extended outages.

Maintaining Essential Services

During a power outage, the focus shifts to ensuring communication and essential services continue to function. A portable power station can keep your internet router operational, maintaining your NBN connection and preventing the use of mobile data.

“The Elite 100 V2 transitions to battery power in just 10ms during an outage, which is half the 20ms response time of the AC180 — guaranteeing smoother protection for sensitive equipment.”James Wang, Marketing Manager, BLUETTI.

Preparing for Darkness

Practical recommendations from SES and AusNet include having a battery-operated flashlight ready, storing bottled water if dependent on an electric water pump, and knowing how to manually open garage doors or gates.

Resilience Involves More Than Just Equipment

Storm resilience includes possessing the right gear along with a robust plan. Frequent updates from the Bureau of Meteorology are crucial. Clean gutters, secure outdoor belongings, and prepare power stations for use.

Modern power stations can be recharged using solar panels, providing power independence even if the grid is down for several days.

Pricing and Availability in Australia

The Bluetti Elite 100 V2 is available in Australia, typically sold in packs with chargers or solar panels. It is generally priced at A$999 during promotional periods, a reduction from its recommended retail price of A$1,499, representing a long-term safeguard for home electronics.

Stay secure and ensure your equipment is prepared for any incoming storms.

This video from the Bureau of Meteorology delivers an important severe weather update and guidance on how to prepare for specific storms in south-east Australia.

For further information, visit https://www.bluettipower.com.au/

Conclusion

As severe weather approaches North East Victoria, readiness for potential blackouts is essential. Charging your devices and having a portable power station can sustain communication and keep vital services operational. The Bluetti Elite 100 V2 provides a dependable backup power solution, combined with practical measures to guarantee safety and connectivity during storms.

Q: What are the steps to prepare for a storm?

A: Charge all electronic devices, secure outdoor items, and assemble an emergency kit that includes a portable power station such as the Bluetti Elite 100 V2.

Q: What role does a portable power station play during a blackout?

A: It supplies backup power to keep crucial devices like smartphones and routers functional, thus maintaining communication and internet connectivity.

Q: Is it safe to use a portable power station indoors?

A: Yes, unlike conventional generators, portable power stations are silent and safe for indoor use.

Q: How can I recharge a power station during a prolonged outage?

A: Contemporary power stations can be charged with solar panels once the weather improves, ensuring continuous power supply.

Q: What’s the best way to stay informed during severe weather?

A: Utilize apps like VicEmergency and check the Bureau of Meteorology’s website for live updates and alerts.

UK Government Verifies Cyber Assault in October

David Leane on December 22, 2025

UK Government Cyber Attack: Analysis and Impact – TechBest

Quick Overview

The UK government’s systems were breached in October, as confirmed by a minister.
There is speculation about the Chinese group Storm 1849 being responsible.
It is possible that thousands of visa records were compromised.
The breach was swiftly managed, posing minimal risk to individuals.
Cybersecurity continues to be a primary focus for the UK government.

UK Government Cyber Attack: Incident Overview

A cyber attack on the UK government was officially acknowledged in October, raising alarms concerning national security. Chris Bryant, the minister for the British trade department, confirmed the breach but did not verify the alleged involvement of Chinese actors, as suggested by various reports.

UK government cyber security breach in October

Speculation Regarding Chinese Connection

The Sun has indicated that the Chinese-connected cyber group Storm 1849 may be the entity behind this incident. It is reported that this group forms part of a state-affiliated network targeting political figures and dissenters of the Chinese authority.

Prompt Response and Ongoing Inquiry

Minister Bryant reassured the public that the incident was contained rapidly, minimizing any potential risks to individuals. The UK government is actively pursuing a thorough investigation into the event to maintain system security.

Wider Context of Cybersecurity Threats

Recent cyber breaches involving prominent UK corporations, such as Jaguar Land Rover and Marks & Spencer, underscore an escalating threat environment. These occurrences highlight the necessity for strong cybersecurity measures across various sectors.

Conclusion

The October cyber breach targeting the UK government emphasizes persistent cybersecurity issues. Although the precise sources are still being investigated, this event highlights the critical need for vigilant security protocols.