LinkedIn Initiates Legal Proceedings Against Suspected Data Scrapers Utilizing Millions of Counterfeit Accounts
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
Quick Read
- LinkedIn has launched a legal suit against ProAPIs and Netswift for supposedly generating fake accounts for the purpose of data scraping.
- The firms are accused of utilizing millions of fraudulent accounts to gain access to restricted and confidential LinkedIn information.
- LinkedIn aims to prevent these companies from reaching its platform and demands the eradication of the scraped data.
- This lawsuit emphasizes LinkedIn’s continuous struggle against data scraping, including a prior case against HiQ Labs.
- The legal proceedings highlight the difficulties in safeguarding user data in today’s digital landscape.
Legal Proceedings Against Data Scrapers
LinkedIn, a subsidiary of Microsoft, has begun legal action against ProAPIs, a company based in Delaware, and Netswift, a Pakistani entity, for allegedly maintaining millions of fake accounts. These accounts are claimed to be used for extensive data scraping on the professional networking site.
Details of the Accusations
The lawsuit, submitted in the Northern District of California, asserts that ProAPIs and its affiliates operate a vast array of fake accounts. These accounts reportedly gather data from LinkedIn member profiles, company information, and user posts before being identified by LinkedIn’s security protocols.
LinkedIn claims that ProAPIs generated thousands of email accounts to create these fake identities using fictitious names and stock photos as profile images. Despite LinkedIn’s attempts to shut them down, the defendants allegedly continued to generate hundreds or thousands of new accounts each day.
Effects on LinkedIn’s Infrastructure
The data scraping activities have imposed an “unreasonable load” on LinkedIn’s servers, burdening resources disproportionally compared to genuine users. This has compelled LinkedIn to expand its server capacity, resulting in considerable time and financial expenditure to address the situation.
LinkedIn’s Requests and Legal Precedents
LinkedIn is pursuing a jury trial and a permanent injunction to stop the defendants from accessing its site. The platform demands that all collected data be eliminated, that customers who bought this data be informed, and that damages are compensated, which may include potential punitive damages.
LinkedIn’s user agreement categorically forbids scraping and the creation of fake accounts, stipulations which the defendants acknowledged. This case follows LinkedIn’s earlier legal triumph over HiQ Labs, a company that employed comparable scraping methods.
Summary
LinkedIn’s legal action against alleged data scrapers underscores the persistent struggle to maintain user privacy and data fidelity. By taking a stand against such actions, LinkedIn intends to protect its platform and users from unauthorized data harvesting.