News Corp Risks US$9 Million Revenue Loss if It Withdraws from Google Ads
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission which is paid directly to our Australia-based writers, editors, and support staff. Thank you for your support!
News Corp Risks US$9 Million in Revenue if It Abandons Google Ads
Quick Overview
- News Corp predicts a US$9 million revenue decline if it moves away from Google’s advertising services.
- Google’s advertising exchange holds a commanding position, complicating transitions for publishers.
- The US Department of Justice claims Google has established a monopoly in the ad technology sector.
- Google counters that publishers now engage with various ad platforms beyond its offerings.
- A guilty verdict for Google could compel the company to divest parts of its advertising operations.
Revenue Vulnerability of News Corp Linked to Google Ads
During a testimony in the ongoing antitrust proceedings involving Google in the United States, former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser disclosed that the media conglomerate stands to incur a significant revenue shortfall of at least US$9 million (approximately AUD$13.5 million) should it halt the use of Google’s ad tools. This estimate originated from internal assessments conducted during a 2017 review of alternative advertising technology solutions.
Although expressing dissatisfaction with Google, publishers such as News Corp discovered that the interconnected design of Google’s publisher ad server and ad exchange hampered their ability to switch. Layser indicated that this setup rendered publishers feeling “held captive” by Google’s ecosystem due to potential revenue losses and their dependence on the company’s infrastructure.
Google’s Prevalent Influence in Ad Technology
Layser’s testimony accentuates Google’s significant influence within the advertising tech market. Internal documents from News Corp dating back to 2016 illustrate that the publisher generated US$83.3 million from advertising sales through instant ad tech tools, with over half of those transactions routed through Google’s ad exchange.
By the time Layser exited News Corp in 2022, around 70-80% of the organization’s ad transactions traversed Google’s ad exchange. This substantial dependence on Google’s framework highlights the hurdles publishers encounter when contemplating alternatives. Although moving away from Google could potentially broaden their ad revenue sources, the immediate risk of losing US$9 million from Google-specific advertising rendered such a shift financially daunting.
US Department of Justice’s Case Against Google
The ongoing antitrust trial, spearheaded by the US Department of Justice (DOJ), forms part of a larger legal initiative aimed at establishing that Google has monopolized essential segments of the ad tech industry. Prosecutors maintain that Google’s systems are structured to entrap publishers and advertisers within its ecosystem, thereby obstructing competing ad services from gaining a foothold.
Central to the prosecution’s argument are Google’s ad exchange and publisher ad server, which they assert are employed to undermine competition and preserve Google’s leading market status. The DOJ is pushing to compel Google to divest portions of its advertising technology empire, including Google Ad Manager, to encourage a more competitive market environment.
Google’s Argument: The Advertising Landscape Has Shifted
In its defense, Google contends that the advertising ecosystem has undergone substantial changes since the relevant time frame. The company asserts that contemporary publishers frequently utilize multiple platforms—averaging six, based on their data—for ad sales. Google further notes that there are over 80 advertising technology services available to publishers, arguing that the competitive environment is significantly more vibrant than what the DOJ posits.
Google’s legal representatives argue that the case relies on outdated data, maintaining that the current state of the industry offers a wealth of alternatives for publishers that extend beyond Google’s offerings.
Possible Outcomes for Google
Should the court decide against Google, the company might be required to divest several of its core ad tech assets, including the Google Ad Manager platform. Such a ruling would represent a substantial transformation in the digital advertising landscape, potentially paving the way for other ad tech providers to vie on a more equitable basis.
While the trial is still proceeding, its implications are set to establish a significant precedent regarding the oversight of major technology firms and their domination over digital marketplaces.
Conclusion
News Corp’s potential US$9 million revenue loss underscores the difficulties publishers face when attempting to extricate themselves from Google’s advertising technology framework. The ongoing antitrust trial has the potential to bring extensive ramifications for the advertising sector if Google is determined to have monopolized the market. As the legal proceedings continue, publishers, advertisers, and tech firms are attentively observing to ascertain how the future of ad technology will unfold.
Q: What makes News Corp reluctant to move away from Google Ads?
A:
News Corp estimates that transitioning away from Google’s advertising solutions would entail a significant revenue drop of at least US$9 million. The deep integration of Google’s ad exchange with its publisher ad server complicates the transition for publishers without risking substantial ad revenue loss.
Q: What percentage of News Corp’s advertising transactions utilize Google?
A:
By 2022, an estimated 70-80% of News Corp’s ad transactions were conducted through Google’s ad exchange, illustrating the company’s strong dependence on Google’s advertising technology resources.
Q: What are the allegations made by the US Department of Justice against Google?
A:
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) is alleging that Google has monopolized the digital advertising sector by leveraging its dominant positions in publisher ad services, advertiser networks, and ad exchanges to suppress competition and bind publishers within its ecosystem.
Q: What might occur if Google is declared guilty in the antitrust trial?
A:
If found guilty, the court may mandate Google to sell certain portions of its ad tech operations, including the Google Ad Manager, which could redefine the competitive dynamics within the digital advertising sector.
Q: How does Google reply to these charges?
A:
Google maintains that the advertising market has significantly evolved, with publishers now utilizing several platforms for ad sales. The company claims that the market is considerably more competitive than the DOJ suggests, with over 80 advertising technology services currently accessible.
Q: What potential effects could this trial have on the advertising sector?
A:
If the court rules against Google, it could generate additional opportunities for competing advertising technology firms to challenge Google’s supremacy. It may also result in stricter regulations governing technology giants in the digital advertising landscape.
