ATA calls on the federal government to publish an official roster of triple zero “compliant” devices.

Brief Overview

• ATA calls on the government to make public a list of devices that can make dependable emergency calls.
• Presently, compliance is optional and may miss several devices with problems.
• Telecom providers are creating a private database for in-house purposes.
• Recent failures in devices tied to deaths are sparking public and governmental alarm.

The Demand for a Public Device Registry

The Australian Telecommunications Alliance (ATA) is urging the federal government to set up a public registry of mobile phones that can securely make emergency calls, referred to as “triple zero” calls. This demand comes after a deadly outage on the Optus network led to a parliamentary investigation.

The Justification for a Public Registry

The ATA contends that the existing device compliance framework is inadequate. The Telecommunications Labelling Notice is voluntary, requiring manufacturers to self-report compliance without obligatory public sharing. The suggested public registry would serve as a dependable reference for both consumers and regulators to confirm device compliance and safety.

Ongoing Initiatives by Telecoms

In response to persistent rejection from the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), telecommunications companies have begun to develop their own database. This internal system aims to monitor devices known to have emergency call issues, assisting telcos in fulfilling regulatory requirements. However, this database will not be accessible to the public.

Issues with Device Compliance

The challenge of testing for compliance is currently significant. With more than 40,000 different phone models in Australia, the existing systems only assess a small percentage. This implies that numerous devices that may have problems could escape regulatory oversight, particularly those entering through grey markets.

Government and Regulatory Reactions

The ACMA has tightened testing regulations for devices, especially concerning their ability to switch networks in emergencies. Nonetheless, public scrutiny and recent incidents have intensified demands for more thorough measures.

Recent Events and Public Anxiety

Recent news has connected defective handsets with several fatalities, raising public alarm. For example, certain older Samsung devices have been flagged as problematic, leading carriers to block these models if they are not updated or exchanged within a specified timeframe.

Conclusion

The ATA’s request for a public device registry underscores significant shortcomings in the current compliance framework. While telcos develop internal solutions, the urgency for a publicly available registry is highlighted by recent failures and deaths. The ongoing parliamentary inquiry and governmental actions will likely influence future regulatory directions.

Q: What is the necessity for a public register of compliant devices?

A: A public register would offer a trustworthy source of information for consumers and regulators, ensuring that devices can reliably make emergency calls and minimize the potential for failures.

Q: What are the existing issues with the voluntary compliance structure?

A: The voluntary structure depends on manufacturers self-reporting compliance, which may allow devices with problems to evade scrutiny, especially those entering from grey markets.

Q: How have recent failures affected public opinion?

A: Recent fatalities linked to device failures have heightened public concern and attention, leading governmental and regulatory bodies to rethink current practices.

Q: What measures are telecom companies taking to tackle these problems?

A: Telecom companies are establishing private databases to track non-compliant devices internally, although these will not be accessible to the public.

Q: What role does the ACMA have in ensuring device compliance?

A: The ACMA establishes technical standards and supervises the Telecommunications Labelling Notice, requiring manufacturers to declare device compliance, albeit currently on a voluntary basis.

Q: Are all problematic devices being adequately addressed by the current system?

A: No, only a limited number of devices are tested each year, leaving many problematic devices without resolution, particularly those from grey markets.

Q: What potential actions might the government undertake in the future?

A: The ongoing parliamentary inquiry and public demand may result in the creation of a public register and stricter compliance requirements.